|
Re: Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
I think so, less work and stuff to maintain.
I think so, less work and stuff to maintain.
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14423
·
|
|
Re: Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
Luis, Can proceed with the removal of `mininet-ovs-{25,26}` images if they are no longer required?
Luis, Can proceed with the removal of `mininet-ovs-{25,26}` images if they are no longer required?
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14422
·
|
|
Re: Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
Hi Anil,
FYI I tried new Ubuntu 18.04 and created patch for CSIT to only use these 2 Ubuntu images:
ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - mininet-ovs-28 - x86_64 - 20210329-150700.140
ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - docker -
Hi Anil,
FYI I tried new Ubuntu 18.04 and created patch for CSIT to only use these 2 Ubuntu images:
ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - mininet-ovs-28 - x86_64 - 20210329-150700.140
ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - docker -
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14421
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
OK it took a little more than expected because the new version schema exposed a bug in the distribution code, but here
OK it took a little more than expected because the new version schema exposed a bug in the distribution code, but here
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14420
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Looks like the 'stable' branch on the GH black repo has been removed accidentally.
I'll added a workaround to unblock us for the time being.
Luis, Venkat: Can we get a quick review
Looks like the 'stable' branch on the GH black repo has been removed accidentally.
I'll added a workaround to unblock us for the time being.
Luis, Venkat: Can we get a quick review
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14419
·
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
The 'stable' branch has disappeared on of the upstream tox deps: https://github.com/psf/black/branches.
The 'stable' branch has disappeared on of the upstream tox deps: https://github.com/psf/black/branches.
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14418
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
There are tox failure with the upstream dependencies, and nothing todo with the Infra. I'll need to dig deeps and get back.
05:07:38 expected return code: 005:07:38 stdout: (none)05:07:38
There are tox failure with the upstream dependencies, and nothing todo with the Infra. I'll need to dig deeps and get back.
05:07:38 expected return code: 005:07:38 stdout: (none)05:07:38
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14417
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Also per TSC discussion, the Silicon distribution release version will be: 14.0.0, we will use minor version (2nd digit) for Service Releases and the patch version (3rd digit) for any last minute
Also per TSC discussion, the Silicon distribution release version will be: 14.0.0, we will use minor version (2nd digit) for Service Releases and the patch version (3rd digit) for any last minute
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14416
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Anil,
Can you please check what is going wrong with this job:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/builder-tox-verify-master/
I am unable to verify the change for adding the missing jobs to
Anil,
Can you please check what is going wrong with this job:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/builder-tox-verify-master/
I am unable to verify the change for adding the missing jobs to
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14415
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Sorry I meant 0.14.1
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14414
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
OK guys, I just realized we just released the wrong branch for the common distribution (master vs stable/silicon). Basically because distribution jobs were not updated when we branched off
OK guys, I just realized we just released the wrong branch for the common distribution (master vs stable/silicon). Basically because distribution jobs were not updated when we branched off
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14413
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
OK here is the Silicon release:
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/0.14.0/
We can proceed with the rest of the stuff
OK here is the Silicon release:
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/opendaylight/0.14.0/
We can proceed with the rest of the stuff
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14412
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Hello
Correct, I just released TransportPCE artifacts version 3.0.0 for Silicon.
Release job logs are available at this
Hello
Correct, I just released TransportPCE artifacts version 3.0.0 for Silicon.
Release job logs are available at this
|
By
Guillaume Lambert
·
#14411
·
|
|
[release][TSC] Magnesium EOL - purge jobs on releng/builder
Greetings all:
OpenDaylight Silicon is released which makes Magnesium support EOL official. The below CR removes all the Magnesium jobs from ODL releng/builder repo and
Greetings all:
OpenDaylight Silicon is released which makes Magnesium support EOL official. The below CR removes all the Magnesium jobs from ODL releng/builder repo and
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14410
·
|
|
Re: [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Thanks Anil. I believe that @LAMBERT Guillaume TGI/OLN is already working on the Transport PCE Silicon release. Also I believe that the release notes are being done automatically but
Thanks Anil. I believe that @LAMBERT Guillaume TGI/OLN is already working on the Transport PCE Silicon release. Also I believe that the release notes are being done automatically but
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#14409
·
|
|
[opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon release status
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Silicon version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/silicon' branch is unlocked and ready for development.
Pending activities required to
Hello All,
OpenDaylight Silicon version bump is complete and the staging repository has been promoted. The 'stable/silicon' branch is unlocked and ready for development.
Pending activities required to
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14408
·
|
|
Re: [release] [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
I've built new images with OVS 2.8 on Ubuntu18.04.
"ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - mininet-ovs-28 - x86_64 - 20210329-150700.140" (label: ubuntu1804-mininet-ovs-28-1c-4g)
Please review the change, needs to be
I've built new images with OVS 2.8 on Ubuntu18.04.
"ZZCI - Ubuntu 18.04 - mininet-ovs-28 - x86_64 - 20210329-150700.140" (label: ubuntu1804-mininet-ovs-28-1c-4g)
Please review the change, needs to be
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14407
·
|
|
Re: [release] [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
Well, I do not think ODL OpenStack projects are active anymore, so a single version OVS VM should be sufficient. Anyway, what are the labels for the new images?
BR/Luis
Well, I do not think ODL OpenStack projects are active anymore, so a single version OVS VM should be sufficient. Anyway, what are the labels for the new images?
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#14406
·
|
|
Re: [release] [integration-dev] Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
If I remember correctly as discussed in the integration team meetings, OVS version was dependent on the OpenStack dev version (Rocky, Queens) as tested with the CSIT jobs.
It's up to the $project to
If I remember correctly as discussed in the integration team meetings, OVS version was dependent on the OpenStack dev version (Rocky, Queens) as tested with the CSIT jobs.
It's up to the $project to
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14405
·
|
|
Re: Decommision Ubuntu 16.04 images on ODL Jenkins and update to Ubuntu 18.04 images on releng/builder repo.
These CR's should fix the build failures on Ubuntu 18.04, and installing broken dependencies with ovs 2.6.
These CR's should fix the build failures on Ubuntu 18.04, and installing broken dependencies with ovs 2.6.
|
By
Anil Belur
·
#14404
·
|