|
Re: Patches proposed by jenkins
On 12/12/19 6:48 AM, Robert Varga wrote:
this would be a nice addition. Could it be this simple?
https://gerrit.linuxfoundation.org/infra/c/releng/global-jjb/+/62615
I
On 12/12/19 6:48 AM, Robert Varga wrote:
this would be a nice addition. Could it be this simple?
https://gerrit.linuxfoundation.org/infra/c/releng/global-jjb/+/62615
I
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13883
·
|
|
Re: Builder image content?
There's another option, since the sandbox also needs the ability to do
multi-node tests that means that the cloud credentials can be used to
craft a job to launch the newly defined instance as a
There's another option, since the sandbox also needs the ability to do
multi-node tests that means that the cloud credentials can be used to
craft a job to launch the newly defined instance as a
|
By
Andrew Grimberg
·
#13882
·
|
|
Re: Builder image content?
This will be difficult without LF's help. So as you have found, the builder profiles available in Jenkins are defined
This will be difficult without LF's help. So as you have found, the builder profiles available in Jenkins are defined
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#13881
·
|
|
Patches proposed by jenkins
Hey everyone,
there is a number of patches in Gerrit proposed by production jenkins:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/owner:jenkins-releng%2540opendaylight.org
and by sandbox
Hey everyone,
there is a number of patches in Gerrit proposed by production jenkins:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/owner:jenkins-releng%2540opendaylight.org
and by sandbox
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13880
·
|
|
Re: Builder image content?
Hey Thanh,
Yeah, that's what I assumed would be the answer, but these files are
produced for every
Hey Thanh,
Yeah, that's what I assumed would be the answer, but these files are
produced for every
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13879
·
|
|
Re: Builder image content?
Hi Robert,
Not a super convenient way but you can use the
Hi Robert,
Not a super convenient way but you can use the
|
By
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...>
·
#13878
·
|
|
Builder image content?
Hello,
is there a simple way to know what is the content of a built image?
I mean
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/builder/job/builder-packer-merge-centos-7-builder/78/
does tell me
Hello,
is there a simple way to know what is the content of a built image?
I mean
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/builder/job/builder-packer-merge-centos-7-builder/78/
does tell me
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13877
·
|
|
Re: patches pending for neon sr3 release
Hi Daniel,
I checked with the developer who had raised the Genius patch -https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/genius/+/82988. This is not a must fix.
Please go ahead with the Neon build
Hi Daniel,
I checked with the developer who had raised the Genius patch -https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/genius/+/82988. This is not a must fix.
Please go ahead with the Neon build
|
By
Hema Gopalakrishnan
·
#13876
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
Yeah:
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/9-relnote-issues-3704069.html
:
I think this is a bug in ES, which fails to account for UOE being
legally thrown from
Yeah:
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/9-relnote-issues-3704069.html
:
I think this is a bug in ES, which fails to account for UOE being
legally thrown from
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13875
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
BTW for the first issue (old version not working in Magnesium) I suspect it is JDK 11 problem.
You can can see the ERRORs in this log:
BTW for the first issue (old version not working in Magnesium) I suspect it is JDK 11 problem.
You can can see the ERRORs in this log:
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13874
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
The decanter situation is what I said in the other mail:
- Old decanter version 1.0.X: works well in neon and sodium but not in master so we have to skip magnesium and any future release for now.
-
The decanter situation is what I said in the other mail:
- Old decanter version 1.0.X: works well in neon and sodium but not in master so we have to skip magnesium and any future release for now.
-
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13873
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
Hmm... we do have the odlparent-6.0.3 lot coming up, which upgrades
karaf from 4.2.2 to 4.2.6, if that's any help.
How does latest decanter work on stable/neon? (that already
Hmm... we do have the odlparent-6.0.3 lot coming up, which upgrades
karaf from 4.2.2 to 4.2.6, if that's any help.
How does latest decanter work on stable/neon? (that already
|
By
Robert Varga
·
#13872
·
|
|
Re: patches pending for neon sr3 release
Thank you all. It seems that all patches from my list have been merged... but i see some still pending from searching...
this is the list from
Thank you all. It seems that all patches from my list have been merged... but i see some still pending from searching...
this is the list from
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13871
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
Sure, that works for me. I’ll look for a time slot
--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e: ddelarosa@...
m: +1 408 7728120
Sure, that works for me. I’ll look for a time slot
--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e: ddelarosa@...
m: +1 408 7728120
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13870
·
|
|
Re: patches pending for neon sr3 release
Genius patch is merged.
Thanks,
Hema
Genius patch is merged.
Thanks,
Hema
|
By
Hema Gopalakrishnan
·
#13869
·
|
|
JVM monitoring
While we investigate how to fix current issues including migrating to latest decanter version 2.X, we have following alternatives to keep on using the framework:
- Use original decanter 1.0.X: this
While we investigate how to fix current issues including migrating to latest decanter version 2.X, we have following alternatives to keep on using the framework:
- Use original decanter 1.0.X: this
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13868
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
I just realized I cannot attend the 9pm meeting tomorrow.
Daniel, do you want to try to carve some time out tomorrow earlier in
the day to discuss the release topics. Seems
I just realized I cannot attend the 9pm meeting tomorrow.
Daniel, do you want to try to carve some time out tomorrow earlier in
the day to discuss the release topics. Seems
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13867
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
I'd like to review the possibility of picking up a build for neon sr3 as well as the code freeze for service releases
thanks
--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e:
I'd like to review the possibility of picking up a build for neon sr3 as well as the code freeze for service releases
thanks
--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e:
|
By
Daniel de la Rosa
·
#13866
·
|
|
Re: topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
No agenda item but FYI it is very possible we will have to disable JVM monitoring by default in all jobs. Reason being is new decanter version we are using to fix issues in master is not stable in the
No agenda item but FYI it is very possible we will have to disable JVM monitoring by default in all jobs. Reason being is new decanter version we are using to fix issues in master is not stable in the
|
By
Luis Gomez
·
#13865
·
|
|
topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?
Please write back if you have any agenda item for the meeting
window we have tomorrow 9pm PST. If not much, we will cancel.
Thanks,
JamO
Please write back if you have any agenda item for the meeting
window we have tomorrow 9pm PST. If not much, we will cancel.
Thanks,
JamO
|
By
JamO Luhrsen
·
#13864
·
|