integration-dev@lists.opendaylight.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Hi, I have identified the following patches in the Integration repo after Hydrogen release. I kind of assume all of them apply to stable release but let me know in case you see any it should

By Luis Gomez · #943 ·

Re: Query regarding cbench

Hi Venkat, No really reason, it is only that throughput mode seems more aggressive than latency mode and thats why we wanted to start with the second, but please feel free to use both in your setup.

By Luis Gomez · #942 ·

Re: [controller-dev] opendaylight controller performance test problem

Also please check you are using the right settings for Cbench, specially enabling the reactive forwarding module in the OF

By Luis Gomez · #941 ·

Re: [controller-dev] opendaylight controller performance test problem

Hi, It's recommended you use a different vm for cbench and the controller. This is because both will put heavy load on the CPU. On 19 Apr 2014, at 10:13 pm, "huangxufu" <huangxufu@...> wrote:

By Christopher O'SHEA <christopher.o.shea@...> · #940 ·

Query regarding cbench

Hi Luis, I have executed some tests using cbench for the ODL (Virtualization Edition) for VTN. All the wiki pages regarding cbench in ODL suggest only the "latency" mode option (for cbench). Is

By Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech <venkatrangang@...> · #939 ·

Re: [controller-dev] opendaylight controller performance test problem

Hello Vaishali, Thanks for your suggestion, I will try using OpenFlowPlugin distribution to test performance again. Because i run ODL controller and cbench at the same VM. so I use cbench with

By huangxufu <huangxufu@...> · #937 ·

Re: [controller-dev] opendaylight controller performance test problem

By huangxufu <huangxufu@...> · #938 ·

Re: [controller-dev] opendaylight controller performance test problem

<including integration-dev@... mailer > As per attached email , Chris recently put together nightly performance test against OpenFlowPlugin distribution (not the base controller directly). It doesn't

By Vaishali Mithbaokar (vmithbao) <vmithbao@...> · #936 ·

Re: Netconf using LINC switch

Hi Deepak, Thanks for jumping here. OpenDaylight (ODL) is interested to test netconf SB plugin like testing for ofplugin by retrieving the relevant information through RESTAPI. In the end, it is

By Madhusudhan Kandadai <madhusudhan.opendaylight@...> · #935 ·

Re: [controller-dev] SP edition broken

Hi Devin, The printout is good, but for me it scrolls out of sight before I can notice it, because there are too many logs & exceptions scrolling by. The printout is easy to overlook. I +1 the

By Jan Medved (jmedved) <jmedved@...> · #934 ·

Automation CBench test at Ericsson lab

Hey All, I have quickly put together a nightly test using Cbench against the OF Plugin edition Artifact. The output from Cbench, mem, CPU and controller log is found on the Test tool server

By Christopher O'SHEA <christopher.o.shea@...> · #933 ·

Re: [controller-dev] SP edition broken

OK Devin, I have opened the enhancement #772 in controller bugzilla so we can start discussion. Also I made a note that in the meantime we need either a small fix increasing the the default -Xmx

By Luis Gomez · #932 ·

Re: [controller-dev] SP edition broken

Luis – we do print out a warning now if you don’t specify the –Xmx setting. The best practice is that customers should set their –Xmx setting to the value correct for their environment. This

By Devin Avery <davery@...> · #931 ·

Re: [controller-dev] SP edition broken

I’m thinking that a controller in most cases is the primary application running on a host/VM … perhaps it should take 2/3 of Memory by default? 3/4 even...

By Greg Hall <ghall@...> · #930 ·

Re: [controller-dev] SP edition broken

Hi Devin, thanks for jumping here. Yes we need a fix for this asap, people normally download the editions to test this or that feature and it is very difficult to figure out you need an extra

By Luis Gomez · #929 ·

Re: [controller-dev] SP edition broken

Hi Jan - The memory had always been 1/4th of the OS if you didn’t specify it on the command line. We set the minimum memory to be 1 G if it is undefined (as well as print out a warning). Perhaps

By Devin Avery <davery@...> · #928 ·

Jenkins Integration wiki

Hi team, I finally managed to write the Jenkins integration wiki for remote Labs, please check the bottom link on this

By Luis Gomez · #927 ·

Re: [controller-dev] SP edition broken

Thanks Greg! I wanted to respond to the same effect - I run the SP edition with 2 Gig with no issues. The SP Edition’s memory requirements are larger than the base edition. The heap configuration

By Jan Medved (jmedved) <jmedved@...> · #926 ·

Re: SP edition broken

OK, problem turned out to be (thanks Greg) lack of Java memory, so now we need to run SP edition with -Xmx1500m otherwise it does not work at LF (or my local env). Please let me know if I should open

By Luis Gomez · #925 ·

Re: SP edition broken

More information: the problem has been detected by our system test around 9:00AM (UTC). Here is the link to download SP edition for quick

By Luis Gomez · #924 ·

13741 - 13760 of 14683

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms