Affinity artifacts versions 0.4.1-SNAPSHOT not appearing in Nexus
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
Guys,
It would appear that version 0.4.1-SNAPSHOT of your affinity artifacts are not appearing
in Nexus:
Would you please check to make sure your affinity-merge job is pushing them correctly?
I discovered this while trying to pull together the distribution directories for the Release Vehicles
in the integration project. It cannot resolve them from Nexus :(
Please correct this promptly so that we can include you in the Release Vehicles :)
Ed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Please publish Defense4All artifacts so they can be included in Simultaneous Release Vehicles
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
Resending to defense4-all as original was bounced because I wasn't subscribed.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ed On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Affinity artifacts versions 0.4.1-SNAPSHOT not appearing in Nexus
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
Resending to affinity-dev as the original was bounced because I wasn't subscribed.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ed On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ODL Integration Group weekly call
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi all,
Please do not forget the weekly call tomorrow.
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:Meetings
BR/Luis
From: Cisco WebEx [mailto:admin@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:06 PM To: Luis Gomez Subject: WebEx meeting scheduled: ODL Integration Group weekly call
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ODL Integration Group weekly call (till end of the year)
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
And here is the meeting series till the end of the year.
BR/Luis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Please update vtn-verify and vtn-merge to support Release Vehicles
Hideyuki Tai <h-tai@...>
Hi Ed,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Sorry for the inconvenience. We will look into vtn-verify job and vtn-merge job to support Release Vehicles, and also review the use of check style config. Thanks, Hideyuki Tai -----Original Message-----an issue around the use ofby pulling the check style config into its own maven project (seeopendaylight/commons/opendaylight : directories for each flavor in the integration project.this> [Help 1] would be very much appreciated,as it is blocking getting the Release Vehicles going :)_______________________________________________ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial commit of distributions directories (Base, Virtualization, Service Provider)
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
The initial commit of the distributions directories is here:
If another committer from integration could review it and submit it so it can be merged into master, that would help :)
Ed
P.S. Currently I've commented out of Virtualization vtn and defense4all due to some issues
that prevent their inclusion (their respective aliases have been informed, and the problems should be
easy for them to fix :) )
For the same reasons, defense4all is commented out of Service Provider (again, should be an easy fix).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Initial commit of distributions directories (Base, Virtualization, Service Provider)
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi Ed, I have already approved your commit. Just one curiosity, how is it that the code got merged without running jenkins verify and merge jobs? Are not these set yet?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Initial commit of distributions directories (Base, Virtualization, Service Provider)
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
I just tried the verify job and it failed, maybe this is expected and thats why it is not triggered during the commit.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Please update vtn-verify and vtn-merge to support Release Vehicles
Hideyuki Tai <h-tai@...>
Hi Ed,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The problem has been fixed by the patch pushed by Shigeru. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/1592/ Now, all files of VTN Project needed for building Virtulization Edition are deployed. Regards, Hideyuki Tai -----Original Message-----Vehicles, and also review the use of check style config.with thiswould be very much appreciated,_______________________________________________as it is blocking getting the Release Vehicles going :)_______________________________________________ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Initial commit of distributions directories (Base, Virtualization, Service Provider)
Hideyuki Tai <h-tai@...>
Hi Ed,
The issue on VTN Project has been fixed by the following patch. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/1592/
So could you delete the line to comment out vtn from distributions/virtualization/pom.xml?
I’ve already confirmed that building Virtual Edition with vtn is successful in my local server.
Regards, Hideyuki Tai
From: discuss-bounces@... [mailto:discuss-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Ed Warnicke (eaw)
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:22 PM To: integration-dev@... Cc: discuss@... Subject: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Initial commit of distributions directories (Base, Virtualization, Service Provider)
The initial commit of the distributions directories is here:
If another committer from integration could review it and submit it so it can be merged into master, that would help :)
Ed
P.S. Currently I've commented out of Virtualization vtn and defense4all due to some issues that prevent their inclusion (their respective aliases have been informed, and the problems should be easy for them to fix :) )
For the same reasons, defense4all is commented out of Service Provider (again, should be an easy fix).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Update release information
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi all,
I have been reading about the components and NB APIs available for Basic Edition and I updated our wiki with basic information:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:Release_Features
Please check it out and come back with comments.
BR/Luis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration meeting MoM
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi all, Please check MoM of yesterday meeting:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:Meetings
BR/Luis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
System Test for BGP/PCEP
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi BGP/PCEP people,
I am reading you project wiki and I have a question: do you know of any service or plugin that makes use of your libraries in this ODL first release? I am just trying to figure out how we can test your libraries from a system test point of view.
Thanks/Luis |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: TestON
Swaraj Vinjapuri
Check this at the Github. It is python based. I am trying to setup the environment. Regards, Swaraj From: carol.sanders@... To: swarajv@...; luis.gomez@... CC: integration-dev@... Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:56:14 -0700 Subject: RE: [integration-dev] TestON I would love to be able to demo results of some of our test way On Labs did graphically. It’s probably too much to implement for our current milestone dates but we could perhaps plan to integrate a graphical demonstration of the Test/Automation and CIT environment later.
Very cool,
Carol
From: Swaraj Vinjapuri [mailto:swarajv@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10:52 AM To: Carol Sanders; Luis Gomez Cc: integration-dev@... Subject: RE: [integration-dev] TestON
Yes Luis, I was present at the TWS call as well. ON.LAB Preso was awesome.
the webx recording link is at Sep 30th meeting.
They claim that they have they Unit testing covering 70% code coverage and their
System/Integration testing taking it to 85%.
We should be able to look at what they have and leverage, given that it is an open sources code base.
I am trying to get the contact of folks in ON.LAB and reach out to them. Plan to get my environment setup to get their git code base.
Regards, Swaraj
> From: carol.sanders@... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: System Test for BGP/PCEP
Dana Kutenicsova -X (dkutenic - Pantheon Technologies SRO@Cisco) <dkutenic@...>
Hi Luis, there is no user of our code in ODL, to my knowledge. For BGP we can use http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/ (but note, that it doesn't implement BGP linkstate - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-03) which is core feature in our BGP implementation. As for PCEP, we need to discuss an idea, I'll get back to you next week (no later than on Wednesday). Regards, Dana From: Luis Gomez [luis.gomez@...]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:46 AM To: Robert Varga -X (rovarga - Pantheon Technologies SRO at Cisco); Dana Kutenicsova -X (dkutenic - Pantheon Technologies SRO at Cisco); Tony Tkacik -X (ttkacik - Pantheon Technologies SRO at Cisco); Jan Medved (jmedved) Cc: integration-dev@... Subject: System Test for BGP/PCEP Hi BGP/PCEP people,
I am reading you project wiki and I have a question: do you know of any service or plugin that makes use of your libraries in this ODL first release? I am just trying to figure out how we can test your libraries from a system test point of view.
Thanks/Luis |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Java and REST API docs
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi Ed or any other integration member with some understanding on the development infrastructure:
I saw that for controller project, every time they do a new build they generate a bunch of very useful information regarding Java APIs and NB REST APIs (see attached captures).
Is it possible to generate this useful information when we build our release vehicles? If not, is there a chance to have it available for the other projects (Affinity, Dove, VTN, etc..)? If not, is there a standard way to check the generated APIs without going and read the Java source code?
PS- API freeze Milestone is coming and I am just looking for an easy way to learn about the APIs.
Thanks/Luis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Java and REST API docs
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
There should be… we use the enunciate plugin to do it, and there's no reason other projects couldn't as well. Pulling it all
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
together in one place could be interesting. That said, we do have
That lists them out :)
Ed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Java and REST API docs
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi Ed,
The link is OK but has the same issue, so far only the controller project shows the right information from the build. Question: are the projects supposed to feed this page with their information after API freezes? If so I guess I can wait but it would be good to have something before. If you tell me how this enunciate plugin works, I can maybe ask the projects to include it.
Thanks/Luis
From: Ed Warnicke (eaw) [mailto:eaw@...]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:32 AM To: Luis Gomez Cc: integration-dev@... Subject: Re: Java and REST API docs
There should be… we use the enunciate plugin to do it, and there's no reason other projects couldn't as well. Pulling it all together in one place could be interesting. That said, we do have
That lists them out :)
Ed On Oct 4, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...> wrote:
Hi Ed or any other integration member with some understanding on the development infrastructure:
I saw that for controller project, every time they do a new build they generate a bunch of very useful information regarding Java APIs and NB REST APIs (see attached captures).
Is it possible to generate this useful information when we build our release vehicles? If not, is there a chance to have it available for the other projects (Affinity, Dove, VTN, etc..)? If not, is there a standard way to check the generated APIs without going and read the Java source code?
PS- API freeze Milestone is coming and I am just looking for an easy way to learn about the APIs.
Thanks/Luis
<NB_REST.JPG><API_docs.JPG>
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CSIT OSGi -> CIT Java
Luis Gomez <luis.gomez@...>
Hi all,
I have changed our deliverable and task name: CSIT OSGi -> CIT Java. This is because: 1) I think “Java” is more global than “OSGi” and we are actually helping projects (thanks Moiz) on writing all kind of Java tests (JUnit, PAX-EXAM, etc…). 2) “CIT” (or Continuous Integration Test) is because all these Java tests are executed in the projects whenever they build their code, however this is not the case for release integration. This week we learned (thanks Ed) there is no Java tests invoked when we build a release vehicle, therefore I do not see the point of calling the Java test a System Test “CSIT”.
The Continuous System Integration Test (CSIT) will be the one the release vehicles will pass using the new test framework and tools Carol and other collaborators are working on.
Does this make sense to you?
BR/Luis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|