|
Query regarding creating custom dashboard on Bitergia
If the data is not yet collected in ES, I think we have to contact bitergia and ask how to do this. AFAIR it should be possible but we have to be careful not to override reserved indexes in ES.
If the data is not yet collected in ES, I think we have to contact bitergia and ask how to do this. AFAIR it should be possible but we have to be careful not to override reserved indexes in ES.
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13510
·
|
|
Query regarding creating custom dashboard on Bitergia
AFAIR, there were special credentials to create custom dashboards in bitergia, is this what we are looking for? if so Casey can provide those.
AFAIR, there were special credentials to create custom dashboards in bitergia, is this what we are looking for? if so Casey can provide those.
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13505
·
|
|
BGP performance regression
Hi bgpcep devs, FYI performance regression has been detected here: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/bgpcep/job/bgpcep-csit-1node-bgp-ingest-all-neon/ And logged in this bug: https://jira.o
Hi bgpcep devs, FYI performance regression has been detected here: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/bgpcep/job/bgpcep-csit-1node-bgp-ingest-all-neon/ And logged in this bug: https://jira.o
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13490
·
|
|
Sodium cluster regression
The blocker bug I was talking in the TSC call: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1906 BR/Luis
The blocker bug I was talking in the TSC call: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1906 BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13489
·
|
|
Regression detected in Neon
Hi OFP devs, FYI a regression has been detected recently in stable/neon branch, see details in this ticket: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/OPNFLWPLUG-1074 BR/Luis
Hi OFP devs, FYI a regression has been detected recently in stable/neon branch, see details in this ticket: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/OPNFLWPLUG-1074 BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13488
·
|
|
Integration call today
OK, nobody answered, I think we can cancel today’s meeting.
OK, nobody answered, I think we can cancel today’s meeting.
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13479
·
|
|
Integration call today
Hi int devs, Should we have integration call today? Jamo is still out but since we did not have call last week, maybe we should hold it or drop it if we do not have topics. Thoughts? BR/Luis
Hi int devs, Should we have integration call today? Jamo is still out but since we did not have call last week, maybe we should hold it or drop it if we do not have topics. Thoughts? BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13478
·
|
|
Regarding Opendaylight Internship : Yang Models Publish
Hi Anubhav, We have already selected the interns for the projects of this OpenDaylight internship. Thanks for the interest and remember we are opening new projects every ~6 months. BR/Luis
Hi Anubhav, We have already selected the interns for the projects of this OpenDaylight internship. Thanks for the interest and remember we are opening new projects every ~6 months. BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13464
·
|
|
[OpenDaylight][TSC][release] Fluorine SR3 status 13/06 - RC2 candidate sign off
OK, let me send mail to the SM projects. BTW I missed the last TSC call: was there any decision to create a Fluorine SR4 and if so by when?
OK, let me send mail to the SM projects. BTW I missed the last TSC call: was there any decision to create a Fluorine SR4 and if so by when?
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13454
·
|
|
help with running csit tests
Hi Emmett, Before going deep in your logs, have you made sure your controller runs all the features requires by the test, for example this test [1] uses odl-jolokia,odl-restconf, odl-clustering-test-a
Hi Emmett, Before going deep in your logs, have you made sure your controller runs all the features requires by the test, for example this test [1] uses odl-jolokia,odl-restconf, odl-clustering-test-a
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13453
·
|
|
[release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Fluorine SR3 status sign off
+1
By
Luis Gomez
· #13427
·
|
|
[OpenDaylight TSC] [OpenDaylight][TSC][release] Fluorine SR3 status 13/06 - RC2 candidate sign off
I am fine to release as it is, we can maybe add a comment in the release notes mentioning the BC 1.61 perf issue and the impact in karaf console SSH. BR/Luis
I am fine to release as it is, we can maybe add a comment in the release notes mentioning the BC 1.61 perf issue and the impact in karaf console SSH. BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13426
·
|
|
[OpenDaylight][TSC][release] Fluorine SR3 status 13/06 - RC2 candidate sign off
As I mentioned earlier, there has been some change in karaf fluorine so that now the first time you connect to the console via SSH (ssh -p 8101 karaf@...) can take more than 10 secs. This produc
As I mentioned earlier, there has been some change in karaf fluorine so that now the first time you connect to the console via SSH (ssh -p 8101 karaf@...) can take more than 10 secs. This produc
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13408
·
|
|
[OpenDaylight TSC] Robot FW version update
Just to be clear, it is not 3.2 we are asking, it is >=3.1. Robot 3.1.X is perfectly valid and compatible with both formats. BR/Luis
Just to be clear, it is not 3.2 we are asking, it is >=3.1. Robot 3.1.X is perfectly valid and compatible with both formats. BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13406
·
|
|
Robot FW version update
Hi everybody, We have found some problem with robot version update: 1) Starting robot 3.1, there is a new syntax for FOR loops: *** Test Cases *** Example FOR ${element} IN @{ELEMENTS} Start Element $
Hi everybody, We have found some problem with robot version update: 1) Starting robot 3.1, there is a new syntax for FOR loops: *** Test Cases *** Example FOR ${element} IN @{ELEMENTS} Start Element $
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13401
·
|
|
[release] [OpenDaylight][TSC] Fluorine SR3 status - candidate sign off
I think we have to wait for next AR build and then ask Anil to create the spreadsheet for the new build as usual: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-fluor
I think we have to wait for next AR build and then ask Anil to create the spreadsheet for the new build as usual: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-fluor
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13397
·
|
|
[release] [OpenDaylight][TSC] Fluorine SR3 status - candidate sign off
OK, just opened the ticket here: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1900
OK, just opened the ticket here: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1900
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13376
·
|
|
[release] [OpenDaylight][TSC] Fluorine SR3 status - candidate sign off
Around 50 and now we get less than 5 so we are talking about 1 magnitude perf regression. The test itself does: 1) Start a singleton registration flap on every controller instance with this RPC: /rest
Around 50 and now we get less than 5 so we are talking about 1 magnitude perf regression. The test itself does: 1) Start a singleton registration flap on every controller instance with this RPC: /rest
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13374
·
|
|
[OpenDaylight][TSC][release] Fluorine SR3 status - candidate sign off
Looks like Karaf issue is gone: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-perf-bulkomatic-only-fluorine/ Maybe it was a temporary infra problem.
Looks like Karaf issue is gone: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-perf-bulkomatic-only-fluorine/ Maybe it was a temporary infra problem.
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13373
·
|
|
[groupbasedpolicy-dev] [netconf-dev][GPB-dev][int-dev] Remove Ubuntu 14.04 images
AFAIR the reason for using ubuntu docker was to run netopeer devices. I am not sure the same will work with centos docker but we can always try.
AFAIR the reason for using ubuntu docker was to run netopeer devices. I am not sure the same will work with centos docker but we can always try.
|
By
Luis Gomez
· #13372
·
|