Date
1 - 4 of 4
Distribution-merge triggering on non-managed projects?
|
Robert Varga
Hello,
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/distribution-merge-fluorine/1944/ seems to have triggered by transportpce, which is not a managed project. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/distribution-merge-fluorine/depgraph-view/ seems to indicate we are building distribution for a lot of projects which do not have bearing on it... Is this something we want to do, or just a misconfiguration? Regads, Robert |
|
|
|
Sam Hague <shague@...>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:38 AM Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote: Hello, I think this is what we want. We want the unmanaged projects to be able to build against managed so they can know what they need to fix to be able to join the release. managed and unmanaged are different paths in the integration/distribution of which transportpce is not in the managed group. So I think that part is working as intended. As for the graph, that I don't fully understand. Luis is the expert here, but I think what I said above is right in that we have different configurations for managed an unmanaged. But it's possible something isn't totally right.
|
|
|
|
Robert Varga
On 20/07/18 15:26, Sam Hague wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:38 AM Robert Varga <nite@...Well, after digging a bit ... it is definitely not right to rebuild int/dist if a project is not added to it. I.e. it does not matter what transportpce does at this point, it is not part of int/dist, hence it in no way affects its contents, hence it makes zero sense to trigger on transportpce-merge. Of unmanaged projects only SXP is part of int/dist, as Luis noted. Regards, Robert |
|
|
|
Luis Gomez
Right, current merge job template triggers distribution build by the end of it as that was the way before we split projects. Going forward we will have to remove this step in the merge job template and add the MSI projects trigger in the distribution merge job itself. I will file a patch shortly for this.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
BR/Luis On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:30 AM, Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote: |
|
|