|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 01:27, JamO Luhrsen < jluhrsen@...> wrote:
I think it's time to get SFC out of our managed projects list.
It really
only remained all this time because of netvirt's dependency on it.
However, I don't know if we want to try to do this for Sodium, do
we?
Or is it already decoupled from netvirt?
JamO
On 9/12/19 3:39 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
Hi
SFC team,
During
the TSC meeting today we discussed this issue as well as SFC
in general. We decided to remove the SFC dependency and SFC
tests from the NetVirt project. However, I would like to ask
a broader question. Given that most of you are not full time
on the project, do you folks want to remove SFC from being a
managed project from Sodium? In that case you can turn it
into a self managed project - and can be included if you
desire using the lightweight self managed process.
Alternatively as a self managed project you can also remove
it from Sodium altogether. You do not have to do the SRs if
you are a self managed project, but if support is unlikely
to happen, then it will be cleaner to not have SFC in the
release in the first place.
In
either case, in case you want to move SFC to self managed,
we will need to move fast as the release is already due.
Please let us know right away.
Thanks,
Abhijit
Hello sfc team,
We have this failure in
netvirt SFC csit for quite sometime now.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621
Can anyone look into this?
If there is no active
involvement, please let us know whether we should
disable these suites.
Thanks,
Faseela
Hi Faseela,
As discussed
we have the below JIRA on SFC that needs to be
addressed by SFC team.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621:
SFC:Not able to download and store image in
compute from opnfv
Please kindly
redirect to the concerned team.
Thanks,
Srinivas
+91-9243478719
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13699): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13699
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34120756/535209
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [jluhrsen@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13705): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13705
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34120756/1869318
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [zxiiro@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
|
|
On 13/09/2019 00:39, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: Hi SFC team, [+ direct emails to Jaime and David] During the TSC meeting today we discussed this issue as well as SFC in
general. We decided to remove the SFC dependency and SFC tests from the
NetVirt project. However, I would like to ask a broader question. Given
that most of you are not full time on the project, do you folks want to
remove SFC from being a managed project from Sodium? In that case you
can turn it into a self managed project - and can be included if you
desire using the lightweight self managed process. Alternatively as a
self managed project you can also remove it from Sodium altogether. You
do not have to do the SRs if you are a self managed project, but if
support is unlikely to happen, then it will be cleaner to not have SFC
in the release in the first place. I find the timing of this highly irregular. There is no pressing need to remove SFC at this point in time -- in fact we have a ready-to-ship release and we are almost two weeks late doing that. Furthermore doing so will expend engineering resources -- something that we are sorely in need of. In either case, in case you want to move SFC to self managed, we will
need to move fast as the release is already due. Please let us know
right away. I find 'right away' without directly addressing committers highly aggressive -- we usually give people *at least* two full business days to get back to us. And when we did, it was under direst of circumstances. I am not finding any justification for this move in Sodium. If it were to be done, it should have been done at Final Checkpoint. That ship has sailed when we selected the release candidate build, which does include SFC. It is a fair ask for Magnesium, though. Regards, Robert
|
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:27:28PM -0700, JamO Luhrsen wrote: I think it's time to get SFC out of our managed projects list. It really
only remained all this time because of netvirt's dependency on it.
However, I don't know if we want to try to do this for Sodium, do we?
Or is it already decoupled from netvirt?
JamO
On 9/12/19 3:39 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote:
Hi SFC team,
During the TSC meeting today we discussed this issue as well as SFC in
general. We decided to remove the SFC dependency and SFC tests from the
NetVirt project. However, I would like to ask a broader question. Given
that most of you are not full time on the project, do you folks want to
remove SFC from being a managed project from Sodium? In that case you
can turn it into a self managed project - and can be included if you
desire using the lightweight self managed process. Alternatively as a
self managed project you can also remove it from Sodium altogether. You
do not have to do the SRs if you are a self managed project, but if
support is unlikely to happen, then it will be cleaner to not have SFC
in the release in the first place.
In either case, in case you want to move SFC to self managed, we will
need to move fast as the release is already due. Please let us know
right away.
Thanks,
Abhijit
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:52 AM Faseela K <faseela.k@...
<mailto:faseela.k@...>> wrote:
Hello sfc team,
We have this failure in netvirt SFC csit for quite sometime now.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621
<https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=061fbc6c-5a966763-061ffcf7-0cc47ad93e1a-e498b8411736c274&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fjira.opendaylight.org%2Fbrowse%2FNETVIRT-1621>
Can anyone look into this?
If there is no active involvement, please let us know whether we should disable these suites.
Thanks,
Faseela
*From:*srinivas.rachakonda@...
<mailto:srinivas.rachakonda@...><srinivas.rachakonda@...
<mailto:srinivas.rachakonda@...>>
*Sent:*Wednesday, September 11, 2019 3:05 PM
*To:*Faseela K <faseela.k@... <mailto:faseela.k@...>>
*Cc:*Jaya Priyadarshini <jaya.priyadarshini@...
<mailto:jaya.priyadarshini@...>>; Abhishek Nagori <abhishek.nagori@...
<mailto:abhishek.nagori@...>>
*Subject:*[CSIT] SFC Jira NETVIRT-1621
Hi Faseela,
As discussed we have the below JIRA on SFC that needs to be addressed by SFC team.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621
<https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=061fbc6c-5a966763-061ffcf7-0cc47ad93e1a-e498b8411736c274&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fjira.opendaylight.org%2Fbrowse%2FNETVIRT-1621>:
SFC:Not able to download and store image in compute from opnfv
Please kindly redirect to the concerned team.
Thanks,
Srinivas
+91-9243478719
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13699): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13699
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34120756/535209
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [jluhrsen@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13705): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13705
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34120756/1963840
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [skitt@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
Stephen Kitt
Principal Software Engineer, OpenShift Multi Cluster Networking
Red Hat
|
|
|
I think it's time to get SFC out of our managed projects list.
It really
only remained all this time because of netvirt's dependency on it.
However, I don't know if we want to try to do this for Sodium, do
we?
Or is it already decoupled from netvirt?
JamO
On 9/12/19 3:39 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi
SFC team,
During
the TSC meeting today we discussed this issue as well as SFC
in general. We decided to remove the SFC dependency and SFC
tests from the NetVirt project. However, I would like to ask
a broader question. Given that most of you are not full time
on the project, do you folks want to remove SFC from being a
managed project from Sodium? In that case you can turn it
into a self managed project - and can be included if you
desire using the lightweight self managed process.
Alternatively as a self managed project you can also remove
it from Sodium altogether. You do not have to do the SRs if
you are a self managed project, but if support is unlikely
to happen, then it will be cleaner to not have SFC in the
release in the first place.
In
either case, in case you want to move SFC to self managed,
we will need to move fast as the release is already due.
Please let us know right away.
Thanks,
Abhijit
Hello sfc team,
We have this failure in
netvirt SFC csit for quite sometime now.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621
Can anyone look into this?
If there is no active
involvement, please let us know whether we should
disable these suites.
Thanks,
Faseela
Hi Faseela,
As discussed
we have the below JIRA on SFC that needs to be
addressed by SFC team.
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621:
SFC:Not able to download and store image in
compute from opnfv
Please kindly
redirect to the concerned team.
Thanks,
Srinivas
+91-9243478719
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13699): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13699
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34120756/535209
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [jluhrsen@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
|
|
Hi SFC team,
During the TSC meeting today we discussed this issue as well as SFC in general. We decided to remove the SFC dependency and SFC tests from the NetVirt project. However, I would like to ask a broader question. Given that most of you are not full time on the project, do you folks want to remove SFC from being a managed project from Sodium? In that case you can turn it into a self managed project - and can be included if you desire using the lightweight self managed process. Alternatively as a self managed project you can also remove it from Sodium altogether. You do not have to do the SRs if you are a self managed project, but if support is unlikely to happen, then it will be cleaner to not have SFC in the release in the first place.
In either case, in case you want to move SFC to self managed, we will need to move fast as the release is already due. Please let us know right away.
Thanks, Abhijit
Hello sfc team, We have this failure in netvirt SFC csit for quite sometime now. https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621 Can anyone look into this? If there is no active involvement, please let us know whether we should disable these suites. Thanks, Faseela Hi Faseela, As discussed we have the below JIRA on SFC that needs to be addressed by SFC team. https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621: SFC:Not able to download and store image in compute from opnfv Please kindly redirect to the concerned team. Thanks, Srinivas +91-9243478719
|
|
|
