integration-dev@lists.opendaylight.org | Regarding sfc removal for sodium onwards.

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Date Date 1 - 5 of 5

Regarding sfc removal for sodium onwards.

JayaPr #13721 Hi Jamo/Thanh, As Faseela says https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/releng/autorelease/+/84544/ Faseela K 10:47 AM ↩ Patch Set 1: The decision we had in TSC was to first stop running netvirt sfc csit jobs. Not to stop sfc builds right? I am still confused whether this change is supposed to be merged : Do we get this reverted and only do changes in netvirt/.yaml files to stop the csit jobs rather than removing this module completely. Regards Jaya
More All Messages By This Member
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...> #13724 I thought we decided to remove SFC as a managed project from the magnesium release and _maybe_ from the Sodium SR1 release? In any case yes removing it from autorelease removes SFC as a managed project. If the intention was only to remove the CSIT jobs then a patch be created for the CSIT job instead. Regards, Thanh toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Jaya Priyadarshini <jaya.priyadarshini@...> wrote: Hi Jamo/Thanh, As Faseela says https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/releng/autorelease/+/84544/ Faseela K 10:47 AM ↩ Patch Set 1: The decision we had in TSC was to first stop running netvirt sfc csit jobs. Not to stop sfc builds right? I am still confused whether this change is supposed to be merged : Do we get this reverted and only do changes in netvirt/.yaml files to stop the csit jobs rather than removing this module completely. Regards Jaya
More All Messages By This Member
Luis Gomez #13728 It is being long time we do not remove projects from AR/distribution, just remind the order is: - To remove: first distribution, second AR - To add: first AR, second distribution It is actually weird the patch verified because I remember we had something in place to prevent the wrong order. BR/Luis toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Sep 20, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Thanh ha <zxiiro@...> wrote: I thought we decided to remove SFC as a managed project from the magnesium release and _maybe_ from the Sodium SR1 release? In any case yes removing it from autorelease removes SFC as a managed project. If the intention was only to remove the CSIT jobs then a patch be created for the CSIT job instead. Regards, Thanh On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Jaya Priyadarshini <jaya.priyadarshini@...> wrote: Hi Jamo/Thanh, As Faseela says https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/releng/autorelease/+/84544/ Faseela K 10:47 AM ↩ Patch Set 1: The decision we had in TSC was to first stop running netvirt sfc csit jobs. Not to stop sfc builds right? I am still confused whether this change is supposed to be merged : Do we get this reverted and only do changes in netvirt/.yaml files to stop the csit jobs rather than removing this module completely. Regards Jaya -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13724): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13724 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34227521/1217165 Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@... Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [ecelgp@...] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More All Messages By This Member
Thanh ha <zxiiro@...> #13740 Right totally forgot about the order but you're right I do remember we had a job in place to catch that issue. Will have to revisit and see why we didn't catch it. Regards, Thanh toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 11:48, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote: It is being long time we do not remove projects from AR/distribution, just remind the order is: - To remove: first distribution, second AR - To add: first AR, second distribution It is actually weird the patch verified because I remember we had something in place to prevent the wrong order. BR/Luis On Sep 20, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Thanh ha <zxiiro@...> wrote: I thought we decided to remove SFC as a managed project from the magnesium release and _maybe_ from the Sodium SR1 release? In any case yes removing it from autorelease removes SFC as a managed project. If the intention was only to remove the CSIT jobs then a patch be created for the CSIT job instead. Regards, Thanh On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Jaya Priyadarshini <jaya.priyadarshini@...> wrote: Hi Jamo/Thanh, As Faseela says https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/releng/autorelease/+/84544/ Faseela K 10:47 AM ↩ Patch Set 1: The decision we had in TSC was to first stop running netvirt sfc csit jobs. Not to stop sfc builds right? I am still confused whether this change is supposed to be merged : Do we get this reverted and only do changes in netvirt/.yaml files to stop the csit jobs rather than removing this module completely. Regards Jaya -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13724): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13724 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34227521/1217165 Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@... Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [ecelgp@...] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More All Messages By This Member
Faseela K #13741 I just created a revert patch. @Luis : Did we conclude on the discussion about SFC? Robert had raised some concerns, and was saying we should be waiting till the respective checkpoint before doing the removal for Magnesium. And Jaya’s patch was on master, so I am really not sure whether it is taking care of removal in Sodium. Feel free to abandon my revert patch, if Jaya’s patch was good to go. Thanks, Faseela toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: Thanh Ha <zxiiro@...> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 11:17 PM To: Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> Cc: Jaya Priyadarshini <jaya.priyadarshini@...>; Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...>; netvirt-dev@...; integration-dev@...; Faseela K <faseela.k@...> Subject: Re: [integration-dev] Regarding sfc removal for sodium onwards. Right totally forgot about the order but you're right I do remember we had a job in place to catch that issue. Will have to revisit and see why we didn't catch it. Regards, Thanh On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 11:48, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote: It is being long time we do not remove projects from AR/distribution, just remind the order is: - To remove: first distribution, second AR - To add: first AR, second distribution It is actually weird the patch verified because I remember we had something in place to prevent the wrong order. BR/Luis On Sep 20, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Thanh ha <zxiiro@...> wrote: I thought we decided to remove SFC as a managed project from the magnesium release and _maybe_ from the Sodium SR1 release? In any case yes removing it from autorelease removes SFC as a managed project. If the intention was only to remove the CSIT jobs then a patch be created for the CSIT job instead. Regards, Thanh On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Jaya Priyadarshini <jaya.priyadarshini@...> wrote: Hi Jamo/Thanh, As Faseela says https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/releng/autorelease/+/84544/ Faseela K 10:47 AM ↩ Patch Set 1: The decision we had in TSC was to first stop running netvirt sfc csit jobs. Not to stop sfc builds right? I am still confused whether this change is supposed to be merged : Do we get this reverted and only do changes in netvirt/.yaml files to stop the csit jobs rather than removing this module completely. Regards Jaya -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13724): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13724 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34227521/1217165 Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@... Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [ecelgp@...] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More All Messages By This Member

1 - 5 of 5

1

Previous Topic Next Topic

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms