Hello all,
The master branch is locked for Phosphorus code freeze and branch cutting ("stable/phosphorus") and master branch will be promoted to next (Sulphur). Once the version bump and the release activities are complete, I will notify the status here.
Regards, Anil Belur
|
|
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:01 AM Anil Belur < abelur@...> wrote: Hello all,
The master branch is locked for Phosphorus code freeze and branch cutting ("stable/phosphorus") and master branch will be promoted to next (Sulphur). Once the version bump and the release activities are complete, I will notify the status here.
Regards, Anil Belur
Hello all,
The version bump is complete, the master branch is promoted to the next release (Sulfer) and the "stable/phosphorous" branch is created. The master branch is unlocked and is open for development, while the "stable/phosphorous" branch remains locked until the phosphorous release.
New Jenkins jobs for the phosphorous stream will be added once the CR [1.] is merged.
Regards, Anil Belur
|
|

Daniel de la Rosa
Thanks Anil. Robert, please correct me if I'm wrong, but we have to wait for [1] to be fixed before we can pick a RC
Anil, i think next release code name should be Sulfur
Thanks
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 7:30 PM Anil Belur < abelur@...> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:01 AM Anil Belur < abelur@...> wrote: Hello all,
The master branch is locked for Phosphorus code freeze and branch cutting ("stable/phosphorus") and master branch will be promoted to next (Sulphur). Once the version bump and the release activities are complete, I will notify the status here.
Regards, Anil Belur
Hello all,
The version bump is complete, the master branch is promoted to the next release (Sulfer) and the "stable/phosphorous" branch is created. The master branch is unlocked and is open for development, while the "stable/phosphorous" branch remains locked until the phosphorous release.
New Jenkins jobs for the phosphorous stream will be added once the CR [1.] is merged.
Regards, Anil Belur
|
|
Thanks Anil. Robert, please correct me if I'm wrong, but we have to wait for [1] to be fixed before we can pick a RC
Anil, i think next release code name should be Sulfur
Yes, We need Luis or someone from the integration team to merge 97467, then we can pick up the subsequent AR build.
|
|

Daniel de la Rosa
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 2:45 AM Anil Belur < abelur@...> wrote:
Thanks Anil. Robert, please correct me if I'm wrong, but we have to wait for [1] to be fixed before we can pick a RC
Anil, i think next release code name should be Sulfur
Yes, We need Luis or someone from the integration team to merge 97467, then we can pick up the subsequent AR build.
97467 is merged, so i guess i can pick AR #211, Integration #167. There are some CSIT failures
so i guess we have to just evaluate that. @Anil Belur can you produce the spreadsheet for phosphorus? i dont have privileges to come up with a new one
thanks
|
|
On 22/09/2021 06:14, Daniel de la Rosa wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 2:45 AM Anil Belur <abelur@... <mailto:abelur@...>> wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:29 PM Daniel de la Rosa <ddelarosa0707@... <mailto:ddelarosa0707@...>> wrote: Thanks Anil. Robert, please correct me if I'm wrong, but we have to wait for [1] to be fixed before we can pick a RC [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/97467 <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/97467> Anil, i think next release code name should be Sulfur <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur> Yes, We need Luis or someone from the integration team to merge 97467, then we can pick up the subsequent AR build. 97467 is merged, so i guess i can pick AR #211, Integration #167. There are some CSIT failures https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/167/csit_failed_tests.txt.gz <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/167/csit_failed_tests.txt.gz> so i guess we have to just evaluate that. @Anil Belur <mailto:abelur@...> can you produce the spreadsheet for phosphorus? i dont have privileges to come up with a new one I have retriggered the job, as the OVSDB/OFP test cases failed with: Waiting to initialize infrastructure... WARN: Failed to initialize stack. Reason: Resource CREATE failed: Forbidden: resources.vm_1_group.resources[0].resources.instance: Quota exceeded for ram: Requested 8192, but already used 999424 of 1000000 ram (HTTP 403) (Request-ID: req-5e8808dd-c609-418c-83e7-a0078a080051) i.e. instance limits, again :( Bye, Robert
|
|

Daniel de la Rosa
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:17 AM Robert Varga < nite@...> wrote: On 22/09/2021 06:14, Daniel de la Rosa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 2:45 AM Anil Belur <abelur@...
> <mailto:abelur@...>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:29 PM Daniel de la Rosa
> <ddelarosa0707@... <mailto:ddelarosa0707@...>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Anil. Robert, please correct me if I'm wrong, but we
> have to wait for [1] to be fixed before we can pick a RC
>
> [1]
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/97467
> <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/test/+/97467>
>
> Anil, i think next release code name should be Sulfur
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur>
>
> Yes, We need Luis or someone from the integration team to merge
> 97467, then we can pick up the subsequent AR build.
>
>
> 97467 is merged, so i guess i can pick AR #211, Integration #167. There
> are some CSIT failures
>
> https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/167/csit_failed_tests.txt.gz
> <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/integration-distribution-test-phosphorus/167/csit_failed_tests.txt.gz>
>
> so i guess we have to just evaluate that. @Anil Belur
> <mailto:abelur@...> can you produce the spreadsheet for
> phosphorus? i dont have privileges to come up with a new one
I have retriggered the job, as the OVSDB/OFP test cases failed with:
> Waiting to initialize infrastructure...
> WARN: Failed to initialize stack. Reason: Resource CREATE failed: Forbidden: resources.vm_1_group.resources[0].resources.instance: Quota exceeded for ram: Requested 8192, but already used 999424 of 1000000 ram (HTTP 403) (Request-ID: req-5e8808dd-c609-418c-83e7-a0078a080051)
i.e. instance limits, again :(
Phosphorus AR#212 integration #169 has only one test case failed
so looks to me like a good RC candidate
Bye,
Robert
|
|