topics for integration meeting tomorrow (12/11/2019)?


JamO Luhrsen
 

Please write back if you have any agenda item for the meeting
window we have tomorrow 9pm PST. If not much, we will cancel.

Thanks,
JamO


Luis Gomez
 

No agenda item but FYI it is very possible we will have to disable JVM monitoring by default in all jobs. Reason being is new decanter version we are using to fix issues in master is not stable in the cluster jobs (member delayed startup, sometimes the boot process is not completed, etc). I am investigating some workarounds but so far no luck :(

BR/Luis

On Dec 10, 2019, at 2:56 PM, JamO Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote:

Please write back if you have any agenda item for the meeting
window we have tomorrow 9pm PST. If not much, we will cancel.

Thanks,
JamO
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13864): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13864
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/68007144/1217165
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub [ecelgp@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Daniel de la Rosa
 

I'd like to review the possibility of picking up a build for neon sr3 as well as the code freeze for service releases

thanks

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:56 PM JamO Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote:
Please write back if you have any agenda item for the meeting
window we have tomorrow 9pm PST. If not much, we will cancel.

Thanks,
JamO
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13864): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13864
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/68007144/1964961
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub  [ddelarosa@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e: ddelarosa@...
m:  +1 408 7728120


JamO Luhrsen
 

I just realized I cannot attend the 9pm meeting tomorrow.

Daniel, do you want to try to carve some time out tomorrow earlier in
the day to discuss the release topics. Seems that it's our only topic
at this point anyway.


JamO

On 12/10/19 5:07 PM, Daniel De La Rosa wrote:

I'd like to review the possibility of picking up a build for neon sr3 as well as the code freeze for service releases

thanks

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:56 PM JamO Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote:
Please write back if you have any agenda item for the meeting
window we have tomorrow 9pm PST. If not much, we will cancel.

Thanks,
JamO
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13864): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13864
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/68007144/1964961
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub  [ddelarosa@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e: ddelarosa@...
m:  +1 408 7728120


Daniel de la Rosa
 

Sure, that works for me. I’ll look for a time slot 

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:22 PM Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote:
I just realized I cannot attend the 9pm meeting tomorrow.

Daniel, do you want to try to carve some time out tomorrow earlier in
the day to discuss the release topics. Seems that it's our only topic
at this point anyway.



JamO

On 12/10/19 5:07 PM, Daniel De La Rosa wrote:
I'd like to review the possibility of picking up a build for neon sr3 as well as the code freeze for service releases

thanks

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:56 PM JamO Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote:
Please write back if you have any agenda item for the meeting
window we have tomorrow 9pm PST. If not much, we will cancel.

Thanks,
JamO
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13864): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13864
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/68007144/1964961
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub  [ddelarosa@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e: ddelarosa@...
m:  +1 408 7728120

--
Daniel de la Rosa
Customer Support Manager
Lumina Networks Inc.
e: ddelarosa@...
m:  +1 408 7728120


Robert Varga
 

On 11/12/2019 00:44, Luis Gomez wrote:
Reason being is new decanter version we are using to fix issues in master is not stable in the cluster jobs (member delayed startup, sometimes the boot process is not completed, etc). I am investigating some workarounds but so far no luck :(
Hmm... we do have the odlparent-6.0.3 lot coming up, which upgrades
karaf from 4.2.2 to 4.2.6, if that's any help.

How does latest decanter work on stable/neon? (that already has
karaf-4.2.6).

Regards,
Robert


Luis Gomez
 

The decanter situation is what I said in the other mail:

- Old decanter version 1.0.X: works well in neon and sodium but not in master so we have to skip magnesium and any future release for now.
- Updated decanter version 1.X: works in all branches but cluster start is impacted so we have to skip all cluster tests.
- Latest decanter version 2.X: does not work in any branch, it could be some configuration/ES integration problem, I guess we will need to spend some cycles here to make it work.

BR/Luis

On Dec 11, 2019, at 12:09 PM, Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 11/12/2019 00:44, Luis Gomez wrote:
Reason being is new decanter version we are using to fix issues in master is not stable in the cluster jobs (member delayed startup, sometimes the boot process is not completed, etc). I am investigating some workarounds but so far no luck :(
Hmm... we do have the odlparent-6.0.3 lot coming up, which upgrades
karaf from 4.2.2 to 4.2.6, if that's any help.

How does latest decanter work on stable/neon? (that already has
karaf-4.2.6).

Regards,
Robert


Luis Gomez
 

BTW for the first issue (old version not working in Magnesium) I suspect it is JDK 11 problem.


BR/Luis


On Dec 11, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Luis Gomez via Lists.Opendaylight.Org <ecelgp=gmail.com@...> wrote:

The decanter situation is what I said in the other mail:

- Old decanter version 1.0.X: works well in neon and sodium but not in master so we have to skip magnesium and any future release for now.
- Updated decanter version 1.X: works in all branches but cluster start is impacted so we have to skip all cluster tests.
- Latest decanter version 2.X: does not work in any branch, it could be some configuration/ES integration problem, I guess we will need to spend some cycles here to make it work.

BR/Luis

On Dec 11, 2019, at 12:09 PM, Robert Varga <nite@...> wrote:

On 11/12/2019 00:44, Luis Gomez wrote:
Reason being is new decanter version we are using to fix issues in master is not stable in the cluster jobs (member delayed startup, sometimes the boot process is not completed, etc). I am investigating some workarounds but so far no luck :(

Hmm... we do have the odlparent-6.0.3 lot coming up, which upgrades
karaf from 4.2.2 to 4.2.6, if that's any help.

How does latest decanter work on stable/neon? (that already has
karaf-4.2.6).

Regards,
Robert


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13873): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13873
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/68007144/1217165
Group Owner: integration-dev+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub  [ecelgp@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Robert Varga
 

On 11/12/2019 22:50, Luis Gomez wrote:
BTW for the first issue (old version not working in Magnesium) I suspect
it is JDK 11 problem.

You can can see the ERRORs in this
log: https://logs.opendaylight.org/sandbox/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-2/openflowplugin-csit-1node-perf-bulkomatic-only-magnesium/5/odl_1/odl1_karaf.log.gz
Yeah:

Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Boot class path mechanism is not supported
at java.management/sun.management.RuntimeImpl.getBootClassPath(RuntimeImpl.java:99)
at org.elasticsearch.monitor.jvm.JvmInfo.<clinit>(JvmInfo.java:77)
... 54 more
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/9-relnote-issues-3704069.html
:

The boot class path has been mostly removed in this release. The java -Xbootclasspath and -Xbootclasspath/p options have been removed. The javac -bootclaspath option can only be used when compiling to JDK 8 or older. The system property sun.boot.class.path has been removed. Deployments that rely on overriding platform classes for testing purposes with -Xbootclasspath/p will need to changed to use the --patch-module option that is documented in JEP 261. The -Xbootclasspath/a option is unchanged.
I think this is a bug in ES, which fails to account for UOE being
legally thrown from RuntimeMXBean.getBootClassPath().

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56167397/elasticsearch-1-6-could-not-initialize-class-org-elasticsearch-monitor-jvm-jvmin,
too :)

Regards,
Robert