Re: Proposal for Virtual Tenant Network
|
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
Yamabe-san,
Thank you very much for your project proposal, my comments are inline below.
On May 6, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Tomohisa YAMABE <t-yamabe@...> wrote:
Hello, I don't think that C/C++ should present any problem.
The Project Lifecycle: http://www.opendaylight.org/project-lifecycle-releases
calls for a minimum two week public comment period for project proposals (presuming you are seeking
to enter as an incubation project, rather than a bootstrap project). Once that period has passed a
creation review will be held, and presuming the TSC approves (which I would expect) development
resources (like git repos, etc) will be provided.
Because contributions of existing code need to go through IPR review prior to the creation review,
I would expect you would need to provide the code to the OpenDaylight staff for that process to conclude prior
to your creation review. You should email Phil Robb <probb@...> to arrange for those mechanics
sooner rather than later.
* Package name used in Java Yes, org.opendaylight.vtn sounds very reasonable as a vendor neutral package name.
It is generally a good practice for packages to be named org.opendaylight.<repo name>, and I would expect
your git repo to be named vtn given the project name :)
* Deep dive I believe that the hackfest is being moved out towards June 6-7… it would be awesome to do a deep dive
then :)
Ed
Regards, |
|
|