Just wondering, why do we want to reflect explictly who are going to be user of the project or not? i believe we never asked any projects to do anything like that before.

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...> wrote:

One other matter... I think the GBP folks have made clear they are not intending to be users of this new project, so its probably good to have the proposal reflect that.

Ed

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...> wrote:

Yes, we have a new name OVIL (Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer) for it, Ed agreed with this name J So I think you can start formal creation review thread on the TSC mailing list.

 

Because of name change, I drafted a new page for this, https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:OVIL, you can still use the old one https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Vpp for convenience.

 

 

From: Colin Dixon [mailto:colin@...]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:58 PM
To: Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...>
Cc: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>; Robert Varga <nite@...>; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <tcechval@...>; project-proposals@...ylight.org
Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp

 

So, assuming the name is fixed, should we start a formal creation review thread on the TSC mailing list?

 

--Colin

 

_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...ylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals

--

Thanks

Anil