Re: A new project proposal vpp
Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>
Ed disagrees with name which contains plugin because it will make people confused about plugins inside of vpp and this project. If we don’t look at OVIL as an acronym, I think it is a neutral name.
In summary, I think we still use ovil, please forget “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” if you have some concerns, I can remove “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” from wiki page if you mind.
Yes, it is vpp specific project, so “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” is just to show its relationship with Opendaylight and VPP J
From: George Zhao [mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 7:49 AM
To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>; Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...>; Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...>
Cc: project-proposals@...; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <tcechval@...>
Subject: RE: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp
OVIL is not that bad, OVP is a good name as well.
I think the question here is Anil’s original question that whether this project is specific for VPP, if yes, then both OVIL or OVP are fine.
On Behalf Of Yang, Yi Y
Maybe we can name it as “ed” J
From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagbard@...]
Eccentric perhaps, but not Evil ;)
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote: