1. Messages
  2. A new project proposal vpp

Re: A new project proposal vpp

Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>
 

Ed disagrees with name which contains plugin because it will make people confused about plugins inside of vpp and this project. If we don’t look at OVIL as an acronym, I think it is a neutral name.

 

In summary, I think we still use ovil, please forget “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” if you have some concerns, I can remove “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” from wiki page if you mind.

 

Yes, it is vpp specific project, so “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” is just to show its relationship with Opendaylight and VPP J

 

From: George Zhao [mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 7:49 AM
To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>; Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...>; Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...>
Cc: project-proposals@...; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <tcechval@...>
Subject: RE: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp

 

OVIL is not that bad, OVP is a good name as well.

 

I think the question here is Anil’s original question that whether this project is specific for VPP, if yes, then both OVIL or OVP are fine.

 

From: project-proposals-bounces@... [mailto:project-proposals-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Yang, Yi Y
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Ed Warnicke; Abhijit Kumbhare
Cc: project-proposals@...; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp

 

Maybe we can name it as “ed” J

 

From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagbard@...]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 4:57 AM
To: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...>
Cc: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>; Colin Dixon <colin@...>; project-proposals@...; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <tcechval@...>
Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp

 

Eccentric perhaps, but not Evil ;)

 

Ed

 

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote:

OVIL sounds somewhat EVIL :)

 

Just curious: is "OpenDaylight VPP Interface Layer" too different from "VPP Plugin" proposed by Yi earlier? As a suggestion - if you want to avoid the evil sounding OVIL acronym, yet want to hide the name VPP inside an acronym perhaps you could go with the name OVP (an acronym for "OpenDaylight VPP Plugin").

 

 

 

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...> wrote:

Yes, we have a new name OVIL (Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer) for it, Ed agreed with this name J So I think you can start formal creation review thread on the TSC mailing list.

 

Because of name change, I drafted a new page for this, https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:OVIL, you can still use the old one https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Vpp for convenience.

 

From: Colin Dixon [mailto:colin@...]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:58 PM
To: Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...>


Cc: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>; Robert Varga <nite@...>; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <tcechval@...>; project-proposals@...
Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp

 

So, assuming the name is fixed, should we start a formal creation review thread on the TSC mailing list?

 

--Colin

 

 

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...> wrote:

Yi,

 

honeycomb/vbd is named that way :)

 

Ed

 
Join {project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org to automatically receive all group messages.