Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: Colin Dixon [mailto:colin@...]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:32 AM
To: George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...>
Cc: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>; Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...>; Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...>; project-proposals@...; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <tcechval@...>
Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp
I think OVIL is more than fine. I'll kick off the discussion on the TSC list.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:14 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
OVIL actually SGTM.
From: Yang, Yi Y [mailto:yi.y.yang@...]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 5:49 PM
To: George Zhao; Ed Warnicke; Abhijit Kumbhare
Cc:
project-proposals@...; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Subject: RE: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp
Ed disagrees with name which contains plugin because it will make people confused about plugins inside
of vpp and this project. If we don’t look at OVIL as an acronym, I think it is a neutral name.
In summary, I think we still use ovil, please forget “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” if you have
some concerns, I can remove “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” from wiki page if you mind.
Yes, it is vpp specific project, so “Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer” is just to show its relationship
with Opendaylight and VPP J
OVIL is not that bad, OVP is a good name as well.
I think the question here is Anil’s original question that whether this project is specific for VPP,
if yes, then both OVIL or OVP are fine.
Maybe we can name it as “ed”
J
From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagbard@...]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 4:57 AM
To: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...>
Cc: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>; Colin Dixon <colin@...>;
project-proposals@...; Tomas Cechvala -X (tcechval - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <tcechval@...>
Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] A new project proposal vpp
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote:
OVIL sounds somewhat EVIL :)
Just curious: is "OpenDaylight VPP Interface Layer" too different from "VPP Plugin" proposed by Yi earlier? As a suggestion - if you want to avoid the evil sounding OVIL acronym,
yet want to hide the name VPP inside an acronym perhaps you could go with the name OVP (an acronym for "OpenDaylight VPP Plugin").
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...> wrote:
Yes, we have a new name OVIL (Opendaylight VPP Interface Layer) for it, Ed agreed with this name
J So I think you can start formal creation review thread on the TSC mailing list.
Because of name change, I drafted a new page for this,
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:OVIL, you can still use the old one
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Vpp for convenience.
From: Colin Dixon [mailto:colin@...]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:58 PM
To: Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...>
So, assuming the name is fixed, should we start a formal creation review thread on the TSC mailing list?
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...> wrote:
Yi,
honeycomb/vbd is named that way :)
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
|
