Re: Project proposal of GNT


Kaiyuan Duan
 

The Yang model currently is defined by ourselves, some attribute fields refer to the standard definition of IETF.

 

----邮件原文----
发件人:Robert Varga  <nite@...>
收件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,project-proposals  <project-proposals@...>
抄 送: (无)
发送时间:2017-08-21 16:10:22
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT


On 08/08/17 11:54, 段凯元 wrote:

> Hi, everyone

Hello,



> We are still discussing with Colin about the TTP project(integrate or
> not), thus currently, we only create the project proposal about
> GNT(General Network Topology). Please review it. Thanks!

> Here is the link: 

> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology

Thanks. One immediate question: when you mention 'we have defined a new
YANG model which provides the abstraction of different kinds of
southbound resources', is this model based on the IETF network topology
work, or is it something completely separate?

Regards,
Robert


Subject:Re: [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT

On 08/08/17 11:54, 段凯元 wrote:

> Hi, everyone

Hello,



> We are still discussing with Colin about the TTP project(integrate or
> not), thus currently, we only create the project proposal about
> GNT(General Network Topology). Please review it. Thanks!

> Here is the link: 

> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology

Thanks. One immediate question: when you mention 'we have defined a new
YANG model which provides the abstraction of different kinds of
southbound resources', is this model based on the IETF network topology
work, or is it something completely separate?

Regards,
Robert


Join project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org to automatically receive all group messages.