----邮件原文----
发件人："huan.linying" <huan.linying@...>
收件人：duankaiyuan <duankaiyuan@...>
抄　送: vishnoianil <vishnoianil@...>,"An.Ho" <An.Ho@...>,tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
发送时间：2017-08-23 10:50:44
主题：答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT

Hi Kaiyuan,

The creation review could be done  in a TSC weekly meeting, which is held in every Thursday. And every forth Thurday meeting in a month will in  APAC timezone. 08/23 is the next APAC meeting but a ceation review should be two weeks later after proposal  was submitted. So you can choose a later meeting. 

Thanks.

原始邮件

发件人： <duankaiyuan@...>;

收件人： <vishnoianil@...>; <An.Ho@...>;

抄送人： <tsc@...>; <project-proposals@...>;

日 期 ：2017年08月23日 09:09

主 题 ：Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT

Hi，

I am a little bit confused about the schedule, An said the meeting this month is 8/23(PST), why we can do the creation review at 8/31?

Kaiyuan

 

----邮件原文----
发件人：Anil Vishnoi  <vishnoianil@...>
收件人：An Ho  <An.Ho@...>
抄　送: "段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,"<tsc@...>" <tsc@...>,project-proposals  <project-proposals@.....org>
发送时间：2017-08-23 02:06:54
主题：Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT

Thanks An for the correction. 

So i believe the earliest possible date we can do the creation review is 08/31 (10 AM PST) or if you prefer the APAC timezone then its 09/27.

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:06 AM, An Ho <An.Ho@...> wrote:

TSC holds APAC meeting every fourth Thursday of every month, the next meeting is on 8/24 (8/23 in Pacific Time Zone).

 

Best Regards,

An Ho

 

From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Anil Vishnoi
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 12:08 AM
To: 段凯元
Cc: <tsc@...>; project-proposals
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT

 

Hi Duankauyuan,

 

Looks like GNT project proposal is ready for the creation review, so we can officially start the two week of review process for TSC to review the proposal.

 

I believe month end TSC meeting (08/30) is scheduled for Asia-friendly timezone, so it's prefect timing for your project creation review. Pleas let us know if this time works for you.

 

https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2017&month=8&day=30&hour=3&min=30&sec=0&p1=771&p2=33&p3=248&p4=283&p5=263&p6=37

 

 You can read through some advice on creation reviews here:

https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Main#Instructions_for_Submitting_Creation_Review

 

Thanks

Anil

 

 

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:06 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:

The Yang model currently is defined by ourselves, some attribute fields refer to the standard definition of IETF.

 

----邮件原文----
发件人：Robert Varga  <nite@...>
收件人："段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,project-proposals  <project-proposals@...>
抄　送: (无)
发送时间：2017-08-21 16:10:22
主题：Re: [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT

On 08/08/17 11:54, 段凯元 wrote:
> 
> Hi, everyone

Hello,

> 
> 
> We are still discussing with Colin about the TTP project(integrate or
> not), thus currently, we only create the project proposal about
> GNT(General Network Topology). Please review it. Thanks!
> 
> Here is the link: 
> 
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology

Thanks. One immediate question: when you mention 'we have defined a new
YANG model which provides the abstraction of different kinds of
southbound resources', is this model based on the IETF network topology
work, or is it something completely separate?

Regards,
Robert

Subject：Re: [Project-proposals] Project proposal of GNT

On 08/08/17 11:54, 段凯元 wrote:
> 
> Hi, everyone

Hello,

> 
> 
> We are still discussing with Colin about the TTP project(integrate or
> not), thus currently, we only create the project proposal about
> GNT(General Network Topology).. Please review it. Thanks!
> 
> Here is the link: 
> 
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology

Thanks. One immediate question: when you mention 'we have defined a new
YANG model which provides the abstraction of different kinds of
southbound resources', is this model based on the IETF network topology
work, or is it something completely separate?

Regards,
Robert

_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals

 

--

Thanks

Anil

--

Thanks

Anil