toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks for reinitiating this George - this had fallen thru the cracks for a long time. And appreciate the patience the proposed committers/contributors Hongwei Yang, Wenying Dong & Xiao Shen - as well as the person championing the project Huan Linying.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...>
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
主 题：答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since
the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
TSC mailing list
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
收件人：段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
主 题：Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
收件人：Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@....org>,tsc <firstname.lastname@example.org>
主题：Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
发件人：Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
收件人：Sam Hague <email@example.com>,"段凯元" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,tsc <email@example.com>,project-proposals <firstname.lastname@example.org>
主题：RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics,
and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal
Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM,
段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
收件人：An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,Sam Hague <email@example.com>
抄 送: tsc <tsc@....org>,project-proposals <firstname.lastname@example.org>
主题：Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
发件人：An Ho <An.Ho@...>
收件人：Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,Sam Hague <email@example.com>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@....org>,tsc <firstname.lastname@example.org>
主题：RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very
complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended
if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS ? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
project-proposals mailing list