project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: 答复: MPLS-TP solution project proposal

Hi Colin， Because MPLS-TP solution project and MPLS-TP service project are very similar, I suggest TSC review the both projects at the same time. 10 am pacific is 1:00 am in Beijing that is a

By Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@...> · #488 ·

Re: Rquesting An MPLS-TP Creation Review

Yes, indeed! I edited the proposal page as you've suggested. (your suggestion makes sense!) https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:MPLS-TP_Service Justin

By Justin · #489 ·

Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Request Creation Review for Cardinal - OpenDaylight Monitoring as a Service

Gaurav; Sounds good. We can collaborate on this one if you're interested. We use the jsmiparser for compiling MIBs, Enterprise MIBs included. Example usage

By Jesse White <jesse@...> · #487 ·

Re: MPLS-TP solution project proposal

When did you want to have a creation review for the MPLS-TP solution project? Are able to attend the TSC call at 10a pacific on Thursdays? Even this Thursday? If the time zone is really inconvenient,

By Colin Dixon · #484 ·

Re: Rquesting An MPLS-TP Creation Review

Actually, it looks like that creation review is going and nearly finished here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-April/005025.html --Colin

By Colin Dixon · #486 ·

Re: Rquesting An MPLS-TP Creation Review

Yes. We've already done that with the other MPLS-TP project. I think we can make that work. The only other thing is that we might try to have a special TSC meeting once per month going forward at a

By Colin Dixon · #485 ·

Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Request Creation Review for Cardinal - OpenDaylight Monitoring as a Service

Hi Jesse, Colin, Thanks for the inputs. Please find clarifications to the queries marked with tag //**Gaurav**//. Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Pande Tata Consultancy Services -----Jesse White

By Pande Gaurav <pande.gaurav@...> · #483 ·

Re: Rquesting An MPLS-TP Creation Review

Hi, To be honest, the time is very inconvenient for us (3 a.m. in the morning), but add to that some of our core members have language barriers when it comes to speaking and listening to English.

By Justin · #482 ·

[OpenDaylight TSC] maintaining cleaner committer lists

Forwarding to project proposals for posterity. The version on the TSC list can be found here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-March/004953.html --Colin ---------- Forwarded message

By Colin Dixon · #481 ·

Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Request Creation Review for Cardinal - OpenDaylight Monitoring as a Service

All; Thanks for looping us in Colin. From what I gather the Cardinal project is adding SNMP support to ODL, allowing the ODL controller to be monitored using existing NMSs. Lacking SNMP support we

By Jesse White <jesse@...> · #480 ·

Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Request Creation Review for Cardinal - OpenDaylight Monitoring as a Service

I wanted to take this opportunity to follow up with the creation review along two threads. First, I'm not sure if you're aware, but the OpenNMS guys (two of which are cc'ed) have been working on

By Colin Dixon · #478 ·

Re: EPC OpenFlow Extension project proposal

Thanks! --Colin

By Colin Dixon · #477 ·

Re: EPC OpenFlow Extension project proposal

Hi Colin, Koby will be the presenter in today’s TSC meeting. Thanks, Ravit.

By Peretz, Ravit <ravit.peretz@...> · #476 ·

Re: EPC OpenFlow Extension project proposal

I'm assuming you'll be ready to present today starting in a little bit less than an hour? Ideally, the presentation would be something like 10 minutes with 5-10 minutes of conversation/questions

By Colin Dixon · #475 ·

Re: Rquesting An MPLS-TP Creation Review

Would you be available to do the creation review on 4/14 at that time then? If attending at that time is too difficult, we are also experimenting with doing creation reviews over e-mail in those

By Colin Dixon · #479 ·

New Project Proposal JSON RPC 2.0 Extension

Good morning, We would like to propose a new project to extend ODL southbound functionality via JSON RPC 2.0. The project proposal has been posted on the ODL wiki:

By Anton Ivanov · #474 ·

Re: Rquesting An MPLS-TP Creation Review

Hi Colin, Thank you for your offer. However, I am on a business trip right now and will not be able to do the creation review on 4/7 10a pacific time. I've attached some YANG files in my other

By Justin · #473 ·

Re: Rquesting An MPLS-TP Creation Review

Sorry for delaying so long, this project proposal has been public since 3/16, so you are entitled to a creation review at any time. We normally do them on during the TSC call on Thursdays. More

By Colin Dixon · #472 ·

Re: [ovsdb-dev] Ovsdb Netvirt Project Split Proposal

Without treading too far into waters that we should discuss on the TSC call this week, the project mentions Neutron (although admittedly not in the scope), as an example of a northbound API for

By Colin Dixon · #471 ·

Re: [ovsdb-dev] Ovsdb Netvirt Project Split Proposal

Joel, Based on my experience with you, I am sure you are not dense. This proposal is a spin out of the existing NetVirt functionality from the existing OVSDB Project. As such, we did not believe that

By Andre Fredette <afredette@...> · #470 ·

341 - 360 of 829

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms