Dear Anil, I received the following mail fromproject-proposals-bounces@... saying that, my mail is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held:

Dear Anil & Team, I am coming back to check on this thread since, Boron release is around the corner next month and if there is a possibility for us to propose our Microwave Project and its code

Hi Vishwanath, Thanks for letting us know. Just want to clarify that approval of the project does not really mean that it will be part of the current official release. For the project those are

Dear Anil, My Apologies for not getting back to you on time on this thread since I have been travelling. We will have to pass this project proposal this time around, since we have already been

Dear Anil, 9th June should be possible and we will address the concerns below as well. I am looping my colleague Manoj Nair as well who will be supporting this project proposition.

Hi Vishwanath, Thanks for the project proposal. Two weeks of review time for your project proposal ends around 9th June. Will you be able to present the project proposal to tsc during the 9th june TSC

I would suggest to use a different name - there is already a project called Centinel: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Centinel:Main Centennial and Centinel have similar spelling/pronounciation and

Hi Vishwanath, Could you please add email address for each committer, if you have their Linux ID, it will be very helpful to list that as well. Thanks, George

This serves as the beginning of the two-week public comment period to archive the Defense4All project. Full details of the reasons for archiving it can be found on the archive proposal

This serves as the beginning of the two-week public comment period to archive the Defense4All project. Full details of the reasons for archiving it can be found on the archive proposal

This serves as the beginning of the two-week public comment period to archive the Affinity project. Full details of the reasons for archiving it can be found on the archive proposal

Dear OpenDaylight Team, We would like to propose a new project for OpenDaylight: Boron Offset 2 titled "Centennial". Centennial is an ONF MWTG (Microwave Transport Group) initiative which

Thank you for this. A quick skim of the proposal shows that your repo name is "Transport PCE", but it really needs to be all one word, all lowercase, so I'd suggest transportpce or

Dear all, Please find here under a link towards the description of a new ODL project focusing on path computing for OTN/WDM networks with still having in mind moving to fully converged path

On 19/04/16 02:20, Colin Dixon wrote: Sure. A.

Would you be ready to present this Thursday at 10a pacific? Normally it only takes 10-20 minutes to go over the generic approach, scope, etc. --Colin

​+1 good idea.​ -- Thanks Anil

Yes, we want to join the Boron Release and offset 1. Justin

And did you also want to join the Boron Release [0] and if so, at what offset [1]? --Colin [0] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Boron_Release_Plan [1]

We're already doing the review of the MPLS-TP service project, which you can see here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-April/005025.html I'll start one for the MPLS-TP solution