You may want to create two wiki pages for the two proposals respectively, then refer them by links in the

Hi, Warnicke Thanks for your reply, I will first share our ideas and the details about the two proposals here: 1, Hardware TTP Our team have defined a standard TTP(Typed Table Pattern) pipeline

Hello Kaiyauan, I think it is worth drafting project proposals, at least to support the discussions of what is being proposed. Thanks, Robert

Good place to start. You might also cc discuss Ed

Hi, everyone Our team from China Mobile are preparing to create two new project proposals recently, But I am wondering is this the right way to send emails to this list if we want to have a

Thanks Colin.

I think OVIL is more than fine. I'll kick off the discussion on the TSC list. --Colin

OVIL actually SGTM.

Ed disagrees with name which contains plugin because it will make people confused about plugins inside of vpp and this project. If we don’t look at OVIL as an acronym, I think it is a neutral name.

OVIL is not that bad, OVP is a good name as well. I think the question here is Anil’s original question that whether this project is specific for VPP, if yes, then both OVIL or OVP are fine.

Maybe we can name it as “ed”J

Ed, I’ll remove work GBP from wiki page to reflect your concernJ

OVP is Windriver product name, I don’t think we can use it.

Ed, I’ll remove work GBP from wiki page to reflect your concernJ

Eccentric perhaps, but not Evil ;) Ed

Also not sure why we need "Opendaylight" in the project name? But i don't have a strong object as such, i would defer it to project if they really want to have it in project name. -- Thanks Anil

OVIL sounds somewhat EVIL :) Just curious: is "OpenDaylight VPP Interface Layer" too different from "VPP Plugin" proposed by Yi earlier? As a suggestion - if you want to avoid the evil sounding OVIL

That's a good point... Yi, how do you feel about Anil's suggestion? Ed

Just wondering, why do we want to reflect explictly who are going to be user of the project or not? i believe we never asked any projects to do anything like that before. -- Thanks Anil

One other matter... I think the GBP folks have made clear they are not intending to be users of this new project, so its probably good to have the proposal reflect that. Ed