I was looking at https://github.com/romix/java-concurrent-hash-trie-map/tree/master/src/main/java/com/romix/scala/collection/concurrent - looks like there's a lot more than was there now. and that

nite@nitebug : ~/odl/yangtools/third-party/triemap on $ find . -name \*.java | wc -l 51 nite@nitebug : ~/odl/yangtools/third-party/triemap on $ find . -name \*.java | xargs wc -l | tail -n 1 4691

an entire formal new ODL project for these... 5 classes strikes me as .. curious. I noticed that you have, apparently in vain, attempted to contribute to upstream

Thanks An. To GNT team, I just quickly read through the GNT proposal. A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology

+Adding FAAS Mailing List It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap. Best Regards, An Ho

Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed. Also would GNT use the TTP

Hello everyone, I would like to propose a new project, TrieMap, as detailed in https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Triemap. This would be an Oxygen-timeframe spin-off from YANG

Hi, everyone What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the next step? Thanks, Kaiyuan

Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology Previous discussion can be found

Hi, everyone I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT through email. Please feel free to ask any questions！And I have already cc all committers. Kaiyuan

I'll just send an e-mail to the TSC mailing list opening the creation review, and we'll let people ask questions and you can answer them. If the coversation has mostly died down in a week, I'll ask

Hi, Colin Really? We really prefer to do the review in the next two weeks rather than waiting for the 4th Thursday. What's the process of the creation review through email? Kaiyuan

OK. We can also do it over e-mail if you'd like to try to get it done sooner than next month. --Colin

Hi, everyone Thanks for you help. We decide to do the creation review at the forth Thursday next month. Kaiyuan

Ideally it should be done once TSC officially approves the project after creation review. -- Thanks Anil

Got it, one more question: Should we submit the code for IPR review before the creation review?

TSC meeting schedule is here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Meeting_Schedule_and_Logistics. Normally TSC meeting starts at 1:00AM UTC+8 and APAC meeting starts at 11:30 AM

Thanks for clearing this up! However, is there a list of the timezone for each meeting? We hope to choose one in Sep.

Hi Kaiyuan, The creation review could be done in a TSC weekly meeting, which is held in every Thursday. And every forth Thurday meeting in a month will in APAC timezone. 08/23 is the next APAC

Anil is including the 2 week review period for people to go over your proposal which would be over by August 31 meeting. On the other hand the TSC meeting of August 23 is in a timezone favorable to