Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creationreview for GNT project proposal
Thanks all! We will soon start the set-up work with helpdesk.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----邮件原文---- 发件人:Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> 收件人:Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> 抄 送: "project-proposals@..." <project-proposals@...>,"tsc@..." <tsc@...>,"dayavanti.gopal.kamath@..." <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>,Stephen Kitt <skitt@...> 发送时间:2017-12-22 03:54:21 主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creationreview for GNT project proposal
That's 8 votes out of 13 - so that carries. Rest of the folks can continue to vote for the sake of posterity.
Congratulations GNT project! Please work with the helpdesk to get the project set up (repo, assigning committer rights, etc.). Also your project wiki page will need to be done - not sure whether helpdesk creates a skeleton project wiki for you to fill in the details - or whether you do it yourself. Anyway - you can ask this to helpdesk when you are requesting your project to be set up.
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal

Lori Jakab
+1
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote: +1
On 12/21/2017 10:42 AM, George Zhao wrote:
+1
*From:*tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare *Sent:* Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:28 AM *To:* Luis Gomez *Cc:* Stephen Kitt; tsc@...; project-proposals@...; dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@... <mailto:ecelgp@...>> wrote:
+1
On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@... <mailto:skitt@...>> wrote:
+1
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500 Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>> wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@... <mailto:abhijitkoss@...>> wrote:
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki. opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology <http://opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology>
Previous discussion can be found here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1 (disapprove)
Thanks, Abhijit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George *发件人:*huan.linying@... <mailto:huan.linying@...> *收件人:*George Zhao, *抄 送:*duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>,vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>, shague@... <mailto:shague@...>,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>,tsc@ lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>,project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>, *时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主题:*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件 *发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>>; *收件人:* <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>; <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>; <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>; *抄送人:* <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>; <project-proposals@... aylight.org <http://aylight.org>>; *日期:*2017年12月21日11:43 *主题:**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks George *发件人:*段凯元 *收件人:*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama, *抄送:*tsc,project-proposals, *时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25 *主题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>,Sam Hague < shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan ti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:ti.gopal.kamath@...>> *抄送: *An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,project-proposals <project-propos als@... <mailto:als@...>>,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>> *收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>
,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>
*抄送: *colin <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>,An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>
,project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>
*发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51 *主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec reationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@... <mailto:shague@...>] *Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM *To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V *Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals *Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>
,Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>
*抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>> *发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea tionreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>> *收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>
,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*抄送: *project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>
*发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37 *主**题:*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea tionreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* Xingjun Chu *Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM *To:* An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>; Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; 段凯元< duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc < tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks Xingjun
“
*From:* An Ho *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM *To:* Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>; Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc < tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...> [mailto:tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...> daylight.org <http://daylight.org> <tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...>>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM *To:* 段凯元 *Cc:* project-proposals; tsc *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:
Hi, everyone
What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the next step?
Thanks,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>> *收件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>>,"杨红伟" <yanghongwei@... <mailto:yanghongwei@...>
,dongwenying <dongwenying@... <mailto:dongwenying@...>>,"沈肖" <
shenxiao@... <mailto:shenxiao@...>> *发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/ view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the result there.
Please ask any more questions you have.
Thanks,
--Colin
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT through email.
Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all committers.
Kaiyuan
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
That's 8 votes out of 13 - so that carries. Rest of the folks can continue to vote for the sake of posterity.
Congratulations GNT project! Please work with the helpdesk to get the project set up (repo, assigning committer rights, etc.). Also your project wiki page will need to be done - not sure whether helpdesk creates a skeleton project wiki for you to fill in the details - or whether you do it yourself. Anyway - you can ask this to helpdesk when you are requesting your project to be set up.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote: +1
On 12/21/2017 10:42 AM, George Zhao wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> *From:*tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:28 AM
> *To:* Luis Gomez
> *Cc:* Stephen Kitt; tsc@...; project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org; dayavanti.gopal.kamath@ericsson.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@... <mailto:ecelgp@...>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@... <mailto:skitt@...>> wrote:
>
>
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500
> Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> <abhijitkoss@... <mailto:abhijitkoss@...>> wrote:
>
>
> While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the
> long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email
> back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that
> people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's
> TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on
> vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as
> it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and
> overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC
> TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
>
> Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki.
> opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
> <http://opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology>
>
> Previous discussion can be found here:
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
> 2017-August/thread.html
>
> TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1
> (disapprove)
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijit
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao
> <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com>> wrote:
>
>
> I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We
> just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
>
> George
> *发件人:*huan.linying@... <mailto:huan.linying@....cn>
> *收件人:*George Zhao,
> *抄
> 送:*duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>,vivek.v.srivastava@...
> <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com>,
> shague@... <mailto:shague@...>,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@ericsson.com
> <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>,tsc@
> lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>,project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org
> <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>,
> *时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主题:*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
> [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
>
> I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at
> 06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume
> the review as GNT project.
>
> Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these
> new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss
> the next APAC meeting.
>
>
> 原始邮件
> *发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com>>;
> *收件人:* <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>>;
> <vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com>>; <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>;
> <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@ericsson.com <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>; *抄送人:*
> <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>>; <project-proposals@...
> aylight.org <http://aylight.org>>; *日期:*2017年12月21日11:43
> *主题:**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
> [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@... <mailto:TSC@lists.opendaylight.org>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
>
> I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we
> know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
>
> Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to
> present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However
> this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we
> have quorum.
>
> thanks
> George
> *发件人:*段凯元
> *收件人:*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
> *抄送:*tsc,project-proposals,
> *时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25
> *主题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]
> Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
>
> Hi, Ao Ho, all
>
>
> Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
>
>
> Kaiyuan
>
>
>
> ----邮件原文----
> *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>>
> *收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V
> <vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com>>,Sam Hague <
> shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan
> ti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:ti.gopal.kamath@ericsson.com>> *抄送: *An Ho
> <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,project-proposals <project-propos
> als@... <mailto:als@lists.opendaylight.org>>,tsc <tsc@...
> <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>>
> *发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re: [Project-proposals]
> [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
>
> Hi, Vivek, All
>
>
> Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the
> monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices,
> including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two
> projects have no overlap.
>
>
> BR,
>
> Kaiyuan
>
>
> ----邮件原文----
> *发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com>>
> *收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,"段凯元"
> <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>
>
> ,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@ericsson.com <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>
>
> *抄送: *colin <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>,An Ho
> <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,tsc
> <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>
>
> ,project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>>
>
> *发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51
> *主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec
> reationreviewfor GNT
>
>
>
> Hi Sam, All,
>
>
>
> I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is
> no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly
> on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform
> any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application
> services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm
> this.
>
> With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vivek
>
> *From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@... <mailto:shague@...>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
> *To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
> *Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
> *Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the
> creationreviewfor GNT
>
>
>
> Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were
> some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would
> be good to wait until they confirm that.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元
> <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone
>
>
>
> Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no
> more question?
>
>
>
> Thanks and BR,
>
> Kaiyuan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----邮件原文----
> *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>>
> *收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xingjun Chu
> <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>
>
> ,Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>
>
> *抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>>,project-proposals
> <projec t-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:t-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>>
> *发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51
> *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea
> tionreviewfor GNT
>
>
>
> Hi, An Ho and everyone
>
>
>
> I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT
> project.
>
>
>
> ----邮件原文----
> *发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>
> *收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,Sam Hague
> <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>
>
> ,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>>
>
> *抄送: *project-proposals
> <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
>
> ,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>>
>
> *发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37
> *主**题:*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea
> tionreview for GNT
>
>
>
> As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the
> hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> An Ho
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Xingjun Chu
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM
> *To:* An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>; Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>;
> 段凯元< duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>>
> *Cc:* project-proposals
> <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>>; tsc <
> tsc@... <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
> [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
>
>
>
> Thanks An.
>
>
>
> To GNT team,
>
> I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
>
> A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of
> the topology and track the changes of the topology across
> different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary
> to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the
> topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted
> topology.
>
> But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network
> of this project is based on the implementation of neutron,
> features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical
> network models. “,
>
> Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering
> what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3
> services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with
> FaaS goal in some degree.
>
> Thanks
> Xingjun
>
> “
>
>
>
> *From:* An Ho
> *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM
> *To:* Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; 段凯元
> <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>>; Xingjun Chu
> <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>> *Cc:* project-proposals
> <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>>; tsc <
> tsc@... <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
> [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
>
>
>
> +Adding FAAS Mailing List
>
>
>
> It would be great to see some cross project discussion and
> collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some
> potential overlap.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> An Ho
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org>
> [mailto:tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...> daylight.org <http://daylight.org>
> <tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org>>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague
> *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
> *To:* 段凯元
> *Cc:* project-proposals; tsc
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the
> creation review for GNT
>
>
>
> Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They
> seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion
> about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
>
>
>
> Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
>
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元
> <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone
>
>
>
> What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the
> next step?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kaiyuan
>
>
>
> ----邮件原文----
> *发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>
> *收件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>>
> *抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>>,project-proposals
> <projec t-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:t-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>>,"杨红伟"
> <yanghongwei@... <mailto:yanghongwei@chinamobile.com>
>
> ,dongwenying <dongwenying@... <mailto:dongwenying@chinamobile.com>>,"沈肖" <
>
> shenxiao@... <mailto:shenxiao@chinamobile.com>>
> *发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30
> *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
>
>
>
> Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/
> view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
>
>
>
> Previous discussion can be found here:
>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
> 2017-August/thread.html
>
>
>
> I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we
> can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the
> result there.
>
>
>
> Please ask any more questions you have.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Colin
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元
> <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, everyone
>
>
>
> I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT
> through email.
>
>
>
> Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all
> committers.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kaiyuan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> project-proposals mailing list
> project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> project-proposals mailing list
> project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> project-proposals mailing list
> project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@... <mailto:TSC@lists.opendaylight.org>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@... <mailto:TSC@lists.opendaylight.org>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> TSC@... <mailto:TSC@lists.opendaylight.org>
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...>
+1
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 12/21/2017 10:42 AM, George Zhao wrote: +1
*From:*tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare *Sent:* Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:28 AM *To:* Luis Gomez *Cc:* Stephen Kitt; tsc@...; project-proposals@...; dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@... <mailto:ecelgp@...>> wrote:
+1
On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@... <mailto:skitt@...>> wrote:
+1
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500 Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>> wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@... <mailto:abhijitkoss@...>> wrote:
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki. opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology <http://opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology>
Previous discussion can be found here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1 (disapprove)
Thanks, Abhijit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George *发件人:*huan.linying@... <mailto:huan.linying@...> *收件人:*George Zhao, *抄 送:*duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>,vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>, shague@... <mailto:shague@...>,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>,tsc@ lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>,project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>, *时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主题:*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件 *发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>>; *收件人:* <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>; <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>; <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>; *抄送人:* <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>; <project-proposals@... aylight.org <http://aylight.org>>; *日期:*2017年12月21日11:43 *主题:**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks George *发件人:*段凯元 *收件人:*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama, *抄送:*tsc,project-proposals, *时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25 *主题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>,Sam Hague < shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan ti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:ti.gopal.kamath@...>> *抄送: *An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,project-proposals <project-propos als@... <mailto:als@...>>,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>> *收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>
,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>
*抄送: *colin <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>,An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>
,project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>
*发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51 *主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec reationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@... <mailto:shague@...>] *Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM *To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V *Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals *Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>
,Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>
*抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>> *发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea tionreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>> *收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>
,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*抄送: *project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>
*发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37 *主**题:*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea tionreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* Xingjun Chu *Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM *To:* An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>; Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; 段凯元< duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc < tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks Xingjun
“
*From:* An Ho *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM *To:* Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>; Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc < tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...> [mailto:tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...> daylight.org <http://daylight.org> <tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...>>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM *To:* 段凯元 *Cc:* project-proposals; tsc *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:
Hi, everyone
What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the next step?
Thanks,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>> *收件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> *抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>>,"杨红伟" <yanghongwei@... <mailto:yanghongwei@...>
,dongwenying <dongwenying@... <mailto:dongwenying@...>>,"沈肖" <
shenxiao@... <mailto:shenxiao@...>> *发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/ view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the result there.
Please ask any more questions you have.
Thanks,
--Colin
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT through email.
Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all committers.
Kaiyuan
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote: While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Previous discussion can be found here:
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal

George Zhao
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:28 AM
To: Luis Gomez
Cc: Stephen Kitt; tsc@...; project-proposals@...; dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote:
On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@...> wrote:
+1
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500
Sam Hague <shague@...> wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
<abhijitkoss@...> wrote:
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the
long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email
back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that
people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's
TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on
vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as
it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and
overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC
TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki.
opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html
TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1
(disapprove)
Thanks,
Abhijit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao
<George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We
just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George
*发件人:*huan.linying@...
*收件人:*George Zhao,
*抄
送:*duankaiyuan@...,vivek.v.srivastava@...,
shague@...,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...,tsc@
lists.opendaylight.org,project-proposals@...,
*时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主
题:*答复:
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at
06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume
the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these
new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss
the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件
*发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@...>;
*收件人:* <duankaiyuan@...>;
<vivek.v.srivastava@...>; <shague@...>;
<dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>; *抄送人:*
<tsc@...>; <project-proposals@...
aylight.org>; *日
期
:*2017年12月21日
11:43
*主
题
:**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we
know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to
present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However
this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we
have quorum.
thanks
George
*发件人:*段凯元
*收件人:*段凯元,Vivek
Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
*抄
送:*tsc,project-proposals,
*时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25
*主
题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]
Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@...>
*收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V
<vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <
shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan
ti.gopal.kamath@...> *抄
送: *An Ho
<An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-propos
als@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
*发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re:
[Project-proposals]
[OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the
monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices,
including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two
projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
*收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@...
,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
*抄
送: *colin <colin@...>,An Ho
<An.Ho@...>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc
<tsc@...
,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51
*主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec
reationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is
no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly
on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform
any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application
services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm
this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
*To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
*Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
*Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the
creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were
some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would
be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no
more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@...>
*收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@...
,Sam Hague <shague@...>
*抄
送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51
*主**题:*Re:
[Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea
tionreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT
project.
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...>
*收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague
<shague@...
,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*抄
送: *project-proposals
<project-proposals@...
,tsc <tsc@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37
*主**题:*RE:
[OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea
tionreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the
hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* Xingjun Chu
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM
*To:* An Ho <An.Ho@...>; Sam Hague <shague@...>;
段凯元 <
duankaiyuan@...>
*Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@...>; tsc <
tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of
the topology and track the changes of the topology across
different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary
to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the
topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted
topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network
of this project is based on the implementation of neutron,
features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical
network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering
what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3
services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with
FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks
Xingjun
“
*From:* An Ho
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM
*To:* Sam Hague <shague@...>;
段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...>; Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@...> *Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@...>; tsc <
tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and
collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some
potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* tsc-bounces@...
[mailto:tsc-bounces@...
daylight.org
<tsc-bounces@...>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
*To:* 段凯元
*Cc:* project-proposals; tsc
*Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the
creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They
seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion
about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the
next step?
Thanks,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@...>
*收件人:*"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@...>
*抄
送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@...>,"杨红伟"
<yanghongwei@...
,dongwenying <dongwenying@...>,"沈肖"
<
shenxiao@...>
*发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30
*主**题:*Re:
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/
view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html
I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we
can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the
result there.
Please ask any more questions you have.
Thanks,
--Colin
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT
through email.
Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all
committers.
Kaiyuan
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:28 AM
To: Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
Cc: Stephen Kitt <skitt@...>; tsc@...; project-proposals@...; dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote:
On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@...> wrote:
+1
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500
Sam Hague <shague@...>
wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
<abhijitkoss@...> wrote:
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the
long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email
back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that
people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's
TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on
vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as
it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and
overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC
TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki.
opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html
TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1
(disapprove)
Thanks,
Abhijit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao
<George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We
just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George
*发件人:*huan.linying@...
*收件人:*George Zhao,
*抄
送:*duankaiyuan@...,vivek.v.srivastava@...,
shague@...,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...,tsc@
lists.opendaylight.org,project-proposals@...,
*时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主
题:*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight
TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at
06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume
the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these
new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss
the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件
*发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@...>;
*收件人:* <duankaiyuan@...>;
<vivek.v.srivastava@...>; <shague@...>;
<dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>; *抄送人:*
<tsc@...>; <project-proposals@...
aylight.org>; *日
期
:*2017年12月21日
11:43
*主
题
:**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we
know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to
present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However
this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we
have quorum.
thanks
George
*发件人:*段凯元
*收件人:*段凯元,Vivek
Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
*抄
送:*tsc,project-proposals,
*时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25
*主
题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]
Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V
<vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <
shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan
ti.gopal.kamath@...> *抄
送: *An Ho
<An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-propos
als@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
*发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re:
[Project-proposals]
[OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the
monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices,
including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two
projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
*收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@...
,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
*抄
送: *colin <colin@...>,An Ho
<An.Ho@...>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc
<tsc@...
,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51
*主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec
reationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is
no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly
on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform
any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application
services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm
this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
*To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
*Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
*Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the
creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were
some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would
be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no
more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@...
,Sam Hague <shague@...>
*抄
送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51
*主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals]
[OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea
tionreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT
project.
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...>
*收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague
<shague@...
,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*抄
送: *project-proposals
<project-proposals@...
,tsc <tsc@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37
*主**题:*RE: [OpenDaylight
TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea
tionreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the
hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* Xingjun Chu
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM
*To:* An Ho <An.Ho@...>; Sam Hague <shague@...>;
段凯元 <
duankaiyuan@...>
*Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@...>; tsc <
tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of
the topology and track the changes of the topology across
different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary
to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the
topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted
topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network
of this project is based on the implementation of neutron,
features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical
network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering
what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3
services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with
FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks
Xingjun
“
*From:* An Ho
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM
*To:* Sam Hague <shague@...>;
段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...>; Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@...> *Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@...>; tsc <
tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and
collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some
potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* tsc-bounces@...
[mailto:tsc-bounces@...
daylight.org
<tsc-bounces@...>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
*To:* 段凯元
*Cc:* project-proposals; tsc
*Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the
creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They
seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion
about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the
next step?
Thanks,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
*发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@...>
*收件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*抄
送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@...>,"杨红伟"
<yanghongwei@...
,dongwenying <dongwenying@...>,"沈肖"
<
shenxiao@...>
*发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30
*主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals]
Start the creation review for GNT
Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/
view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html
I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we
can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the
result there.
Please ask any more questions you have.
Thanks,
--Colin
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT
through email.
Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all
committers.
Kaiyuan
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Sure, we can add it to the agenda of next week’s APAC meeting. Looking forward to discussing then.
Best Regards,
An Ho
From:
段凯元 [mailto:duankaiyuan@...]
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 6:58 PM
To: 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...>; Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>; Sam Hague <shague@...>; Dayavanti
Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
Cc: An Ho <An.Ho@...>; project-proposals <project-proposals@...>; tsc <tsc@...>
Subject: Re:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
收件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
发送时间:2017-12-01 09:26:08
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
收件人:Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51
主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS.
It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
From:
Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
To:
段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava
V
Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they
confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM,
段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>
抄 送:
tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文----
发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>
收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄 送:
project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37
主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional
feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going
to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also
be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks
Xingjun
“
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area,
especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
From:
tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Sam Hague
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
To:
段凯元
Cc: project-proposals; tsc
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS
was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote: +1 On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt < skitt@...> wrote:
+1On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500Sam Hague <shague@...> wrote:+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote:
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki. opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1 (disapprove)
Thanks, Abhijit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George *发件人:*huan.linying@... *收件人:*George Zhao, *抄 送:*duankaiyuan@...,vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com, shague@...,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...,tsc@ lists.opendaylight.org,project-proposals@....org, *时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主 题:*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件 *发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@...>; *收件人:* <duankaiyuan@...>; <vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com>; <shague@...>; <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@ericsson.com>; *抄送人:* <tsc@...>; <project-proposals@... aylight.org>; *日 期 :*2017年12月21日 11:43 *主 题 :**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks George *发件人:*段凯元 *收件人:*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama, *抄 送:*tsc,project-proposals, *时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25 *主 题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com>,Sam Hague < shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan ti.gopal.kamath@...> *抄 送: *An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-propos als@...>,tsc <tsc@...> *发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@ericsson.com> *收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...
,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@ericsson.com>
*抄 送: *colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...
,project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
*发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51 *主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec reationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...] *Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM *To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V *Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals *Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...
,Sam Hague <shague@...>
*抄 送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org> *发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea tionreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...> *收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...
,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*抄 送: *project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org
,tsc <tsc@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37 *主**题:*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea tionreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* Xingjun Chu *Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM *To:* An Ho <An.Ho@...>; Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元 < duankaiyuan@...> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>; tsc < tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks Xingjun
“
*From:* An Ho *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM *To:* Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...>; Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>; tsc < tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:tsc-bounces@... daylight.org <tsc-bounces@lists.opendaylight.org>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM *To:* 段凯元 *Cc:* project-proposals; tsc *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the next step?
Thanks,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@...> *收件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *抄 送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>,"杨红伟" <yanghongwei@...
,dongwenying <dongwenying@...>,"沈肖" <
shenxiao@...> *发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/ view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the result there.
Please ask any more questions you have.
Thanks,
--Colin
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT through email.
Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all committers.
Kaiyuan
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________TSC mailing listTSC@...https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt < skitt@...> wrote:
+1On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500Sam Hague <shague@...> wrote:+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote:
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki. opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1 (disapprove)
Thanks, Abhijit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George *发件人:*huan.linying@... *收件人:*George Zhao, *抄 送:*duankaiyuan@...,vivek.v.srivastava@..., shague@...,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...,tsc@ lists.opendaylight.org,project-proposals@..., *时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主 题:*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件 *发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@...>; *收件人:* <duankaiyuan@...>; <vivek.v.srivastava@...>; <shague@...>; <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>; *抄送人:* <tsc@...>; <project-proposals@... aylight.org>; *日 期 :*2017年12月21日 11:43 *主 题 :**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks George *发件人:*段凯元 *收件人:*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama, *抄 送:*tsc,project-proposals, *时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25 *主 题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague < shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan ti.gopal.kamath@...> *抄 送: *An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-propos als@...>,tsc <tsc@...> *发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...> *收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...
,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
*抄 送: *colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...
,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51 *主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec reationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...] *Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM *To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V *Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals *Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...
,Sam Hague <shague@...>
*抄 送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@...> *发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea tionreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...> *收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...
,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*抄 送: *project-proposals <project-proposals@...
,tsc <tsc@...>
*发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37 *主**题:*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea tionreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* Xingjun Chu *Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM *To:* An Ho <An.Ho@...>; Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元 < duankaiyuan@...> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@...>; tsc < tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks Xingjun
“
*From:* An Ho *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM *To:* Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...>; Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@...>; tsc < tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@... daylight.org <tsc-bounces@...>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM *To:* 段凯元 *Cc:* project-proposals; tsc *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the next step?
Thanks,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@...> *收件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *抄 送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@...>,"杨红伟" <yanghongwei@...
,dongwenying <dongwenying@...>,"沈肖" <
shenxiao@...> *发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/ view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the result there.
Please ask any more questions you have.
Thanks,
--Colin
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT through email.
Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all committers.
Kaiyuan
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
_______________________________________________TSC mailing listTSC@...https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
+1 On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500 Sam Hague <shague@...> wrote: +1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote:
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki. opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1 (disapprove)
Thanks, Abhijit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George *发件人:*huan.linying@... *收件人:*George Zhao, *抄 送:*duankaiyuan@...,vivek.v.srivastava@..., shague@...,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...,tsc@ lists.opendaylight.org,project-proposals@..., *时间:*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主 题:*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal ( https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件 *发件人:* <George.Y.Zhao@...>; *收件人:* <duankaiyuan@...>; <vivek.v.srivastava@...>; <shague@...>; <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>; *抄送人:* <tsc@...>; <project-proposals@... aylight.org>; *日 期 :*2017年12月21日 11:43 *主 题 :**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks George *发件人:*段凯元 *收件人:*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama, *抄 送:*tsc,project-proposals, *时间:*2017-12-20 18:58:25 *主 题:*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *收件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague < shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan ti.gopal.kamath@...> *抄 送: *An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-propos als@...>,tsc <tsc@...> *发送时间:*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...> *收件人:*Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...
,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...> *抄 送: *colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...
,project-proposals <project-proposals@...> *发送时间:*2017-11-16 00:05:51 *主题:*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec reationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...] *Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM *To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V *Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals *Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *收件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...
,Sam Hague <shague@...> *抄 送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@...> *发送时间:*2017-11-09 08:43:51 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea tionreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*An Ho <An.Ho@...> *收件人:*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...
,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *抄 送: *project-proposals <project-proposals@...
,tsc <tsc@...> *发送时间:*2017-11-03 01:31:37 *主**题:*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea tionreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* Xingjun Chu *Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM *To:* An Ho <An.Ho@...>; Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元 < duankaiyuan@...> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@...>; tsc < tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks Xingjun
“
*From:* An Ho *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM *To:* Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...>; Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...> *Cc:* project-proposals <project-proposals@...>; tsc < tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
*From:* tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@... daylight.org <tsc-bounces@...>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM *To:* 段凯元 *Cc:* project-proposals; tsc *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the next step?
Thanks,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文---- *发件人:*Colin Dixon <colin@...> *收件人:*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> *抄 送: *tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <projec t-proposals@...>,"杨红伟" <yanghongwei@...
,dongwenying <dongwenying@...>,"沈肖" < shenxiao@...> *发送时间:*2017-09-07 22:56:30 *主**题:*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/ view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/ 2017-August/thread.html
I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the result there.
Please ask any more questions you have.
Thanks,
--Colin
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT through email.
Please feel free to ask any questions!And I have already cc all committers.
Kaiyuan
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ project-proposals mailing list project-proposals@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
_______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Thanks for reinitiating this George - this had fallen thru the cracks for a long time. And appreciate the patience the proposed committers/contributors Hongwei Yang, Wenying Dong & Xiao Shen - as well as the person championing the project Huan Linying.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George
收件人:George Zhao,
时间:2017-12-20 22:25:43
主 题:答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since
the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件
______________________________ _________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks
George
发件人:段凯元
收件人:段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
抄 送:tsc,project-proposals,
时间:2017-12-20 18:58:25
主 题:Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>
收件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@....org>,tsc <tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-12-01 09:26:08
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
收件人:Sam Hague <shague@redhat.com>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,tsc <tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>,project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51
主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics,
and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal
Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM,
段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>
收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,Sam Hague <shague@redhat.com>
抄 送: tsc <tsc@....org>,project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文----
发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>
收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,Sam Hague <shague@redhat.com>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@....org>,tsc <tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37
主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very
complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended
if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks
Xingjun
“
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote: While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Previous discussion can be found here:
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
|
|
Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal
While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.
Previous discussion can be found here:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George
收件人:George Zhao,
时间:2017-12-20 22:25:43
主 题:答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since
the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件
______________________________ _________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks
George
发件人:段凯元
收件人:段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
抄 送:tsc,project-proposals,
时间:2017-12-20 18:58:25
主 题:Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>
收件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@....org>,tsc <tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-12-01 09:26:08
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
收件人:Sam Hague <shague@redhat.com>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,tsc <tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>,project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51
主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics,
and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal
Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM,
段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@chinamobile.com>
收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,Sam Hague <shague@redhat.com>
抄 送: tsc <tsc@....org>,project-proposals <project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文----
发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>
收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@huawei.com>,Sam Hague <shague@redhat.com>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@....org>,tsc <tsc@lists.opendaylight.org>
发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37
主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very
complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended
if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks
Xingjun
“
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

George Zhao
I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.
George
发件人:huan.linying@...
收件人:George Zhao,
抄 送:duankaiyuan@...,vivek.v.srivastava@...,shague@...,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...,tsc@...,project-proposals@...,
时间:2017-12-20 22:25:43
主 题:答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since
the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project.
Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks
George
发件人:段凯元
收件人:段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
抄 送:tsc,project-proposals,
时间:2017-12-20 18:58:25
主 题:Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
收件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
发送时间:2017-12-01 09:26:08
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
收件人:Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51
主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics,
and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal
Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM,
段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>
抄 送: tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文----
发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>
收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37
主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very
complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended
if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks
Xingjun
“
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
From:
tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Sam Hague
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
To: 段凯元
Cc: project-proposals; tsc
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
|
|
Re: 答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at 06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume the review as GNT project. Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss the next APAC meeting.
原始邮件 _______________________________________________ TSC mailing list TSC@... https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week? Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum. thanks George 发件人:段凯元 收件人:段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama, 抄 送:tsc,project-proposals, 时间:2017-12-20 18:58:25 主 题:Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----邮件原文---- 发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 收件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...> 抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...> 发送时间:2017-12-01 09:26:08 主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR, Kaiyuan ----邮件原文---- 发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...> 收件人:Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...> 抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...> 发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51 主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT Hi Sam, All, I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this. With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT. Regards, Vivek From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote: Hi, everyone Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question? Thanks and BR, Kaiyuan ----邮件原文---- 发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...> 抄 送: tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...> 发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51 主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT Hi, An Ho and everyone I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project. ----邮件原文---- 发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...> 收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...> 发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37 主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks. Best Regards, An Ho Thanks An. To GNT team, I just quickly read through the GNT proposal. A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology. But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “, Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree. Thanks Xingjun “ +Adding FAAS Mailing List It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap. Best Regards, An Ho From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Sam Hague Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM To: 段凯元 Cc: project-proposals; tsc Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed. Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

George Zhao
I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?
Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we have quorum.
thanks
George
发件人:段凯元
收件人:段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
抄 送:tsc,project-proposals,
时间:2017-12-20 18:58:25
主 题:Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
收件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
发送时间:2017-12-01 09:26:08
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
收件人:Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>
抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51
主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All,
I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics,
and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this.
With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.
Regards,
Vivek
From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal
Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM,
段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:
Hi, everyone
Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question?
Thanks and BR,
Kaiyuan
----邮件原文----
发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>
抄 送: tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>
发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51
主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT
Hi, An Ho and everyone
I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project.
----邮件原文----
发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>
收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37
主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT
As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.
Best Regards,
An Ho
Thanks An.
To GNT team,
I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.
A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very
complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology.
But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended
if ODL users have other logical network models. “,
Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree.
Thanks
Xingjun
“
+Adding FAAS Mailing List
It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.
Best Regards,
An Ho
From:
tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Sam Hague
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
To: 段凯元
Cc: project-proposals; tsc
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT
Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.
Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Ao Ho, all
Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?
Kaiyuan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----邮件原文---- 发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 收件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...> 抄 送: An Ho <An.Ho@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...> 发送时间:2017-12-01 09:26:08 主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR, Kaiyuan ----邮件原文---- 发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...> 收件人:Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...> 抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...> 发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51 主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All, I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this. With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT. Regards, Vivek From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote: Hi, everyone Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question? Thanks and BR, Kaiyuan ----邮件原文---- 发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...> 抄 送: tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...> 发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51 主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT Hi, An Ho and everyone I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project. ----邮件原文---- 发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...> 收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...> 发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37 主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks. Best Regards, An Ho Thanks An. To GNT team, I just quickly read through the GNT proposal. A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology. But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “, Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree. Thanks Xingjun “ +Adding FAAS Mailing List It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap. Best Regards, An Ho From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Sam Hague Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM To: 段凯元 Cc: project-proposals; tsc Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed. Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
|
|
Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi, Vivek, All
Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices, including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two projects have no overlap.
BR, Kaiyuan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----邮件原文---- 发件人:Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@...> 收件人:Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...> 抄 送: colin <colin@...>,An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...> 发送时间:2017-11-16 00:05:51 主题:RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thecreationreviewfor GNT
Hi Sam, All, I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm this. With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT. Regards, Vivek From: Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM To: 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V Cc: colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals Subject: Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would be good to wait until they confirm that. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote: Hi, everyone Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no more question? Thanks and BR, Kaiyuan ----邮件原文---- 发件人:"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 收件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...> 抄 送: tsc <tsc@...>,project-proposals <project-proposals@...> 发送时间:2017-11-09 08:43:51 主题:Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the creationreviewfor GNT Hi, An Ho and everyone I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT project. ----邮件原文---- 发件人:An Ho <An.Ho@...> 收件人:Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...> 抄 送: project-proposals <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...> 发送时间:2017-11-03 01:31:37 主题:RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the hopes of getting additional feedback from folks. Best Regards, An Ho Thanks An. To GNT team, I just quickly read through the GNT proposal. A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of the topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted topology. But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical network models. “, Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3 services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal in some degree. Thanks Xingjun “ +Adding FAAS Mailing List It would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap. Best Regards, An Ho From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Sam Hague Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM To: 段凯元 Cc: project-proposals; tsc Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed. Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?
|
|