Project Proposal : OF-CONFIG
meng.wei2@...
Hi all, We have posted a project proposal of OF-CONFIG. Proposal can be found at https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:OF-CONFIG Cheers, Wei Meng |
|
Ryan Moats <rmoats@...>
Wei Meng- |
|
meng.wei2@...
Hi Ryan Moats, A slip of the pen. Thanks for your review. Cheers, Wei Meng Ryan Moats <rmoats@...> 2015/07/06 06:08:42: > Wei Meng- > > Small nit in the OF-CONFIG project proposal: > > The first sentence of the section about the OF-Config engine has the > phrase "deploy xxx" - I assume that xxx should be replaced by something? > > Thanks, > Ryan Moats > > project-proposals-bounces@... wrote on 07/02/2015 > 09:40:32 PM: > > > From: meng.wei2@... > > To: project-proposals@... > > Date: 07/02/2015 09:43 PM > > Subject: [Project-proposals] Project Proposal : OF-CONFIG > > Sent by: project-proposals-bounces@... > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > We have posted a project proposal of OF-CONFIG. > > > > Proposal can be found at https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ > > Project_Proposals:OF-CONFIG > > > > > > Cheers, > > Wei Meng_______________________________________________ > > project-proposals mailing list > > project-proposals@... > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals |
|
Robert Varga
On 2015-07-03 04:40, meng.wei2@... wrote:
Hi all, Great project :) I will note that for Beryllium the NETCONF project is split out, so the dependency diagram is not completely accurate. The proposal does not touch on HA. Do you have any thoughts about how that would work? Thanks, Robert |
|
Tony Tkacik
Hi, Do you also plan to export OF-CONFIG topology? It would be nice use-case of overlay – underlay topology Since OF switches configured by OF-CONFIG are „supported/hosted“ On node in NETCONF topology.
Tony
From: project-proposals-bounces@...
[mailto:project-proposals-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Robert Varga
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:36 AM To: meng.wei2@...; project-proposals@... Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] Project Proposal : OF-CONFIG
On 2015-07-03 04:40, meng.wei2@... wrote: Hi all,
|
|
meng.wei2@...
Hi, Please see inline.
Robert Varga <nite@...> 2015/07/07 06:36:15: > Robert Varga <nite@...> > 2015/07/07 06:36 > > > > meng.wei2@..., project-proposals@..., > > > > > > Re: [Project-proposals] Project Proposal : OF-CONFIG > > On 2015-07-03 04:40, meng.wei2@... wrote: > Hi all, > > We have posted a project proposal of OF-CONFIG. > > Great project :) I will note that for Beryllium the NETCONF project > is split out, so the dependency diagram is not completely accurate. > > The proposal does not touch on HA. Do you have any thoughts about > how that would work? [Wei]Thanks. If netconf is split out as a separate project, the dependency diagram needs to be modified. As a SBI plug-in, OF-CONFIG itself does not provide HA service. There might be some ways to reach the aim. For example: One controller connects ofcs via OF-CONFIG, when Active-Standby switch happen, it will restore the switches control through the query operations between controller and switch. > > Thanks, > Robert |
|
meng.wei2@...
Hi Tony, Thanks for your review. Do you mean OF-CONFIG would obtain overlay–underlay topology information? IMO, OF-CONFIG itself cannot obtain underlay information because OF-CONFIG does not provide the connectivity information amang switches. In another way, if have to do so, it makes sense to consider the implementation of SNMP4SDN. Cheers, Wei Meng "Tony Tkacik -X (ttkacik - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <ttkacik@...> 2015/07/07 15:07:56: > Hi, > Do you also plan to export OF-CONFIG topology? > It would be nice use-case of overlay – underlay topology > Since OF switches configured by OF-CONFIG are „supported/hosted“ > On node in NETCONF topology. > > Tony > > From: project-proposals-bounces@... [mailto: > project-proposals-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Robert Varga > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:36 AM > To: meng.wei2@...; project-proposals@... > Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] Project Proposal : OF-CONFIG > > On 2015-07-03 04:40, meng.wei2@... wrote: > Hi all, > > We have posted a project proposal of OF-CONFIG. > > Great project :) I will note that for Beryllium the NETCONF project > is split out, so the dependency diagram is not completely accurate. > > The proposal does not touch on HA. Do you have any thoughts about > how that would work? > > Thanks, > Robert |
|