+1

On 12/21/2017 10:42 AM, George Zhao wrote:

+1



*From:*tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare
*Sent:* Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:28 AM
*To:* Luis Gomez
*Cc:* Stephen Kitt; tsc@...; project-proposals@...; dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...
*Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal



+1



On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@... <mailto:ecelgp@...>> wrote:

+1



On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@... <mailto:skitt@...>> wrote:



+1

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500
Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>> wrote:


+1

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
<abhijitkoss@... <mailto:abhijitkoss@...>> wrote:


While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the
long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email
back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that
people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's
TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on
vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as
it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and
overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC
TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.

Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki.
opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
<http://opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology>

Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html

TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1
(disapprove)

Thanks,
Abhijit

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao
<George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>> wrote:


I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We
just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.

George
*发件人：*huan.linying@... <mailto:huan.linying@...>
*收件人：*George Zhao,
*抄
送：*duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>,vivek.v.srivastava@...
<mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>,
shague@... <mailto:shague@...>,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...
<mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>,tsc@
lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>,project-proposals@...
<mailto:project-proposals@...>,
*时间：*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主题：*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at
06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume
the review as GNT project.

Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these
new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss
the next APAC meeting.


原始邮件
*发件人：* <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>>;
*收件人：* <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>;
<vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>; <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>;
<dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>; *抄送人：*
<tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>; <project-proposals@...
aylight.org <http://aylight.org>>; *日期：*2017年12月21日11:43
*主题：**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*


_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc


I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we
know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?

Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to
present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However
this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs to be sure we
have quorum.

thanks
George
*发件人：*段凯元
*收件人：*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
*抄送：*tsc,project-proposals,
*时间：*2017-12-20 18:58:25
*主题：*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]
Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

Hi, Ao Ho, all


Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?


Kaiyuan



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*收件人：*Vivek Srivastava V
<vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>,Sam Hague <
shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama <dayavan
ti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:ti.gopal.kamath@...>> *抄送: *An Ho
<An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,project-proposals <project-propos
als@... <mailto:als@...>>,tsc <tsc@...
<mailto:tsc@...>>
*发送时间：*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题：*Re: [Project-proposals]
[OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT

Hi, Vivek, All


Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the
monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices,
including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two
projects have no overlap.


BR,

Kaiyuan


----邮件原文----
*发件人：*Vivek Srivastava V <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>
*收件人：*Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>

,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>

*抄送: *colin <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>,An Ho
<An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,tsc
<tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>

,project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>

*发送时间：*2017-11-16 00:05:51
*主题：*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec
reationreviewfor GNT



Hi Sam, All,



I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is
no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly
on monitoring and analytics, and it does not intend to perform
any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application
services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm
this.

With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.



Regards,

Vivek

*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@... <mailto:shague@...>]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
*To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V
*Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
*Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the
creationreviewfor GNT



Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were
some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would
be good to wait until they confirm that.



On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:

Hi, everyone



Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no
more question?



Thanks and BR,

Kaiyuan







----邮件原文----
*发件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*收件人：*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>

,Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>

*抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>>
*发送时间：*2017-11-09 08:43:51
*主**题：*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea
tionreviewfor GNT



Hi, An Ho and everyone



I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT
project.



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>
*收件人：*Xingjun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,Sam Hague
<shague@... <mailto:shague@...>

,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>

*抄送: *project-proposals
<project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>

,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>

*发送时间：*2017-11-03 01:31:37
*主**题：*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea
tionreview for GNT



As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the
hopes of getting additional feedback from folks.



Best Regards,

An Ho





*From:* Xingjun Chu
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM
*To:* An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>; Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>;
段凯元< duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc <
tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



Thanks An.



To GNT team,

I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.

A few comments . If the project only provides an unified view of
the topology and track the changes of the topology across
different vendor devices, it is going to be very complementary
to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the
topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted
topology.

But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network
of this project is based on the implementation of neutron,
features can also be extended if ODL users have other logical
network models. “,

Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering
what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3
services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with
FaaS goal in some degree.

Thanks
Xingjun

“



*From:* An Ho
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM
*To:* Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>; Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>> *Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc <
tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



+Adding FAAS Mailing List



It would be great to see some cross project discussion and
collaboration in this area, especially if there may exist some
potential overlap.



Best Regards,

An Ho





*From:* tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...>
[mailto:tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...> daylight.org <http://daylight.org>
<tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...>>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
*To:* 段凯元
*Cc:* project-proposals; tsc
*Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the
creation review for GNT



Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They
seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion
about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.



Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?



[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS



On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:

Hi, everyone



What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the
next step?





Thanks,

Kaiyuan



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*Colin Dixon <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>
*收件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*抄送: *tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>>,"杨红伟"
<yanghongwei@... <mailto:yanghongwei@...>

,dongwenying <dongwenying@... <mailto:dongwenying@...>>,"沈肖" <

shenxiao@... <mailto:shenxiao@...>>
*发送时间：*2017-09-07 22:56:30
*主**题：*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/
view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology



Previous discussion can be found here:

https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html



I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we
can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the
result there.



Please ask any more questions you have.



Thanks,

--Colin





On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:


Hi, everyone



I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT
through email.



Please feel free to ask any questions！And I have already cc all
committers.





Kaiyuan


_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals




_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals











_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals


_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc




_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc





_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

+1

 

*From:*tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare
*Sent:* Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:28 AM
*To:* Luis Gomez
*Cc:* Stephen Kitt; tsc@...; project-proposals@...; dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...
*Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] Vote for the creation review for GNT project proposal

 

+1

 

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Luis Gomez <ecelgp@... <mailto:ecelgp@...>> wrote:

+1

 

On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@... <mailto:skitt@...>> wrote:

 

+1

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500
Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>> wrote:


+1

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
<abhijitkoss@... <mailto:abhijitkoss@...>> wrote:


While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the
long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email
back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that
people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's
TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on
vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as
it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and
overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC
TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.

Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki.
opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology
<http://opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology>

Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html

TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1
(disapprove)

Thanks,
Abhijit

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao
<George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>> wrote:


I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We
just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.

George
*发件人：*huan.linying@... <mailto:huan.linying@...>
*收件人：*George Zhao,
*抄
送：*duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>,vivek.v.srivastava@...
<mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>,
shague@... <mailto:shague@...>,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...
<mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>,tsc@
lists.opendaylight.org <http://lists.opendaylight.org>,project-proposals@...
<mailto:project-proposals@...>,
*时间：*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主题：*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at
06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume
the review as GNT project.

Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these
new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss
the next APAC meeting.


原始邮件
*发件人：* <George.Y.Zhao@... <mailto:George.Y.Zhao@...>>;
*收件人：* <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>;
<vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>; <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>;
<dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>; *抄送人：*
<tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>; <project-proposals@...
aylight.org <http://aylight.org>>; *日期：*2017年12月21日11:43
*主题：**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*


_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc


I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we
know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?

Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to
present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However
this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs  to be sure we
have quorum.

thanks
George
*发件人：*段凯元
*收件人：*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
*抄送：*tsc,project-proposals,
*时间：*2017-12-20 18:58:25
*主题：*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]
Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

Hi, Ao Ho, all


Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?


Kaiyuan



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*收件人：*Vivek Srivastava V
<vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>,Sam Hague  <
shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama  <dayavan
ti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:ti.gopal.kamath@...>> *抄送: *An Ho
<An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,project-proposals  <project-propos
als@... <mailto:als@...>>,tsc  <tsc@...
<mailto:tsc@...>>
*发送时间：*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题：*Re: [Project-proposals]
[OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT

Hi, Vivek, All


Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the
monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices,
including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two
projects have no overlap.


BR,

Kaiyuan


----邮件原文----
*发件人：*Vivek Srivastava V  <vivek.v.srivastava@... <mailto:vivek.v.srivastava@...>>
*收件人：*Sam Hague  <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>,"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>  

,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@... <mailto:dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>>  

*抄送: *colin  <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>,An Ho
<An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,tsc
<tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>  

,project-proposals <project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>  

*发送时间：*2017-11-16 00:05:51
*主题：*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec
reationreviewfor GNT



Hi Sam, All,



I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is
no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly
on monitoring and analytics,   and it does not intend to perform
any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application
services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm
this.

With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.



Regards,

Vivek

*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@... <mailto:shague@...>]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
*To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal  Kamath;  Vivek Srivastava V
*Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
*Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the
creationreviewfor GNT



Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were
some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would
be good to wait until they confirm that.



On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:

Hi, everyone



   Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no
more question?



Thanks and BR,

Kaiyuan







----邮件原文----
*发件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*收件人：*An Ho  <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>,Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>  

,Sam Hague  <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>  

*抄送: *tsc  <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>>
*发送时间：*2017-11-09 08:43:51
*主**题：*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea
tionreviewfor GNT



Hi, An Ho and everyone



   I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT
project.



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*An Ho  <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>
*收件人：*Xingjun Chu  <Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>>,Sam Hague
<shague@... <mailto:shague@...>  

,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>  

*抄送: *project-proposals
<project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>  

,tsc <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>  

*发送时间：*2017-11-03 01:31:37
*主**题：*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea
tionreview for GNT



As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the
hopes of getting additional feedback  from folks.



Best Regards,

An Ho





*From:* Xingjun Chu
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM
*To:* An Ho <An.Ho@... <mailto:An.Ho@...>>; Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>;
段凯元< duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>  
*Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc <
tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



Thanks An.



To GNT team,

I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.

A few comments .  If the project only provides an unified view of
the topology and track the changes of the topology across
different vendor devices, it is going  to be very   complementary
to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the
topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted
topology.

But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network
of this project is based on the implementation of neutron,
features can also be extended   if ODL users have other logical
network models. “,

Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering
what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3
services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with
FaaS goal in some degree.

Thanks
Xingjun

“



*From:* An Ho
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM
*To:* Sam Hague <shague@... <mailto:shague@...>>; 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>; Xingjun   Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@... <mailto:Xingjun.Chu@...>> *Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>>; tsc <
tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



+Adding FAAS Mailing List



It would be great to see some cross project discussion and
collaboration in this area, especially  if there may exist some
potential overlap.



Best Regards,

An Ho





*From:* tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...>
[mailto:tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...> daylight.org <http://daylight.org>
<tsc-bounces@... <mailto:tsc-bounces@...>>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
*To:* 段凯元
*Cc:* project-proposals; tsc
*Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the
creation review for GNT



Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They
seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion
about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.



Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?



[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS



On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:

Hi, everyone



What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the
next step?





Thanks,

Kaiyuan



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*Colin Dixon  <colin@... <mailto:colin@...>>
*收件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>>
*抄送: *tsc  <tsc@... <mailto:tsc@...>>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@... <mailto:t-proposals@...>>,"杨红伟"
<yanghongwei@... <mailto:yanghongwei@...>  

,dongwenying  <dongwenying@... <mailto:dongwenying@...>>,"沈肖" <

shenxiao@... <mailto:shenxiao@...>>  
*发送时间：*2017-09-07 22:56:30
*主**题：*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/
view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology



Previous discussion can be found here:

https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html



I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we
can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the
result there.



Please ask any more questions you have.



Thanks,

--Colin





On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@... <mailto:duankaiyuan@...>> wrote:


Hi, everyone



I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT
through email.



Please feel free to ask any questions！And I have already cc all
committers.





Kaiyuan


_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals




_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals











_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@... <mailto:project-proposals@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals


_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

 


_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@... <mailto:TSC@...>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

 



_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@...> wrote:

+1

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:35:54 -0500
Sam Hague <shague@...> wrote:

+1

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
<abhijitkoss@...> wrote:

While the elections proceed, apologies on behalf of the TSC for the
long delay for not having this considered sooner after the email
back and forth. The proposal has been around for a long time - that
people may have lost the context to have it for the vote in today's
TSC meeting (or the next as since some of the TSC may be out on
vacations). Hence I think it will be better to vote over email as
it will give folks a chance to go thru the proposal again and
overall will be faster than waiting for the next appropriate APAC
TSC meeting. I will just take the liberty to initiate the vote.

Again for context here is the proposal: https://wiki.
opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology

Previous discussion can be found here:
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html

TSC members - please vote +1 (approve), 0 (no comments), -1
(disapprove)

Thanks,
Abhijit

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, George Zhao
<George.Y.Zhao@...> wrote:

I don't think we need two weeks given it has been over a month. We
just need TSC chair or acting chair to re-initiate vote process.

George
*发件人：*huan.linying@...
*收件人：*George Zhao,
*抄
送：*duankaiyuan@...,vivek.v.srivastava@...,
shague@...,dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...,tsc@
lists.opendaylight.org,project-proposals@...,
*时间：*2017-12-20 22:25:43 *主 题：*答复: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

I've started a mail thread for telemetry project propasal (
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Telemetry) at
06/11. Since the new TSC has been elected, I hope we can resume
the review as GNT project.

Do we need another 2 weeks for the new TSC member to review these
new project propasal? If we need the 2 weeks window, we will miss
the next APAC meeting.


原始邮件
*发件人：* <George.Y.Zhao@...>;
*收件人：* <duankaiyuan@...>;
<vivek.v.srivastava@...>; <shague@...>;
<dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>; *抄送人：*
<tsc@...>; <project-proposals@...
aylight.org>; *日 期 ：*2017年12月21日 11:43
*主 题 ：**Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals]Startthecreationreviewfor GNT*


_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc


I believe GNC project has asked for TSC review for a while, do we
know if there is an Asia time TSC next week?

Kaiyuan, if there will be an Asia time TSC, would you be able to
present the project, then you can request TSC to vote. However
this is Christmas time and you want to survey TSCs  to be sure we
have quorum.

thanks
George
*发件人：*段凯元
*收件人：*段凯元,Vivek Srivastava V,Sam Hague,Dayavanti Gopal Kama,
*抄 送：*tsc,project-proposals,
*时间：*2017-12-20 18:58:25
*主 题：*Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals]
Startthecreationreviewfor GNT

Hi, Ao Ho, all


Can we continue the creatione review for GNT?


Kaiyuan



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*收件人：*Vivek Srivastava V
<vivek.v.srivastava@...>,Sam Hague  <
shague@...>,Dayavanti Gopal Kama  <dayavan
ti.gopal.kamath@...> *抄 送: *An Ho
<An.Ho@...>,project-proposals  <project-propos
als@...>,tsc  <tsc@...>
*发送时间：*2017-12-01 09:26:08 *主题：*Re: [Project-proposals]
[OpenDaylight TSC] Startthecreati onreviewfor GNT

Hi, Vivek, All


Thanks, Vivek, you are right. The GNT project only focus on the
monitoring and analytics of the topo for all southbound devices,
including the overlay topo and underlay topo. I think the two
projects have no overlap.


BR,

Kaiyuan


----邮件原文----
*发件人：*Vivek Srivastava V  <vivek.v.srivastava@...>
*收件人：*Sam Hague  <shague@...>,"段凯元"
<duankaiyuan@...  

,Dayavanti Gopal Kamath <dayavanti.gopal.kamath@...>  

*抄 送: *colin  <colin@...>,An Ho
<An.Ho@...>,Xing jun Chu <Xingjun.Chu@...>,tsc
<tsc@...  

,project-proposals <project-proposals@...>  

*发送时间：*2017-11-16 00:05:51
*主题：*RE: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start thec
reationreviewfor GNT



Hi Sam, All,



I have checked GNT details again, and found that actually there is
no overlap with GENIUS. It appears that the focus of GNT is mainly
on monitoring and analytics,   and it does not intend to perform
any southbound rendering/data-plane programming for application
services (NetVirt/SCF), which GENIUS does. GNT team can confirm
this.

With this understanding, from my side it would be a ‘go’ for GNT.



Regards,

Vivek

*From:* Sam Hague [mailto:shague@...]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:18 PM
*To:* 段凯元; Dayavanti Gopal  Kamath;  Vivek Srivastava V
*Cc:* colin; An Ho; Xingjun Chu; tsc; project-proposals
*Subject:* Re: Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the
creationreviewfor GNT



Including Daya and Vivek S on this thread. I believe there were
some questions regarding overlap with the Genius project. It would
be good to wait until they confirm that.



On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:07 AM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:

Hi, everyone



   Can we move forward to start a vote for the GNT project if no
more question?



Thanks and BR,

Kaiyuan







----邮件原文----
*发件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*收件人：*An Ho  <An.Ho@...>,Xingjun Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@...  

,Sam Hague  <shague@...>  

*抄 送: *tsc  <tsc@...>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@...>
*发送时间：*2017-11-09 08:43:51
*主**题：*Re: [Project-proposals] [OpenDaylight TSC] Start the crea
tionreviewfor GNT



Hi, An Ho and everyone



   I think we can move forward if no more discussion about the GNT
project.



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*An Ho  <An.Ho@...>
*收件人：*Xingjun Chu  <Xingjun.Chu@...>,Sam Hague
<shague@...  

,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>  

*抄 送: *project-proposals
<project-proposals@...  

,tsc <tsc@...>  

*发送时间：*2017-11-03 01:31:37
*主**题：*RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the crea
tionreview for GNT



As per the TSC call today, reviving this email thread with the
hopes of getting additional feedback  from folks.



Best Regards,

An Ho





*From:* Xingjun Chu
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:36 AM
*To:* An Ho <An.Ho@...>; Sam Hague <shague@...>;
段凯元 < duankaiyuan@...>  
*Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@...>; tsc <
tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



Thanks An.



To GNT team,

I just quickly read through the GNT proposal.

A few comments .  If the project only provides an unified view of
the topology and track the changes of the topology across
different vendor devices, it is going  to be very   complementary
to FaaS since FaaS is more focus on the abstraction of the
topology and provides logical network services over the abstracted
topology.

But In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical network
of this project is based on the implementation of neutron,
features can also be extended   if ODL users have other logical
network models. “,

Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and wondering
what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3
services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with
FaaS goal in some degree.

Thanks
Xingjun

“



*From:* An Ho
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59 PM
*To:* Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...>; Xingjun   Chu
<Xingjun.Chu@...> *Cc:* project-proposals
<project-proposals@...>; tsc <
tsc@...> *Subject:* RE: [OpenDaylight TSC]
[Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



+Adding FAAS Mailing List



It would be great to see some cross project discussion and
collaboration in this area, especially  if there may exist some
potential overlap.



Best Regards,

An Ho





*From:* tsc-bounces@...
[mailto:tsc-bounces@... daylight.org
<tsc-bounces@...>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
*To:* 段凯元
*Cc:* project-proposals; tsc
*Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the
creation review for GNT



Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]? They
seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion
about scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.



Also would GNT use the TTP project or something similar?



[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS



On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:

Hi, everyone



What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the
next step?





Thanks,

Kaiyuan



----邮件原文----
*发件人：*Colin Dixon  <colin@...>
*收件人：*"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
*抄 送: *tsc  <tsc@...>,project-proposals
<projec t-proposals@...>,"杨红伟"
<yanghongwei@...  

,dongwenying  <dongwenying@...>,"沈肖" <

shenxiao@...>  
*发送时间：*2017-09-07 22:56:30
*主**题：*Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT



Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/
view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology



Previous discussion can be found here:

https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/
2017-August/thread.html



I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so that we
can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the
result there.



Please ask any more questions you have.



Thanks,

--Colin





On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元
<duankaiyuan@...> wrote:


Hi, everyone



I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT
through email.



Please feel free to ask any questions！And I have already cc all
committers.





Kaiyuan


_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals




_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals











_______________________________________________
project-proposals mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals

_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
TSC@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc