----邮件原文----
发件人：Xingjun Chu  <Xingjun.Chu@...>
收件人：An Ho  <An.Ho@...>,Sam Hague  <shague@...>,"段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄　送:    project-proposals  <project-proposals@...>,tsc <tsc@...>
发送时间：2017-09-19    23:36:27
主题：RE: [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creationreview for GNT

      

Thanks    An. 

 

To    GNT team,

I    just quickly read through the GNT proposal.

 A    few comments .  If the project only provides an unified view of the    topology and track the changes of the topology across different vendor    devices, it is going to be very complementary  to FaaS since FaaS is more    focus on the abstraction of the topology and provides logical network services    over the abstracted topology.

But    In the scope, it also states “At present, the logical    network of this project is based on the implementation of neutron, features    can also be extended  if ODL users have other logical network models. “,    

Sounds GNT also provides services on top of the topo and    wondering what services it provides, if it provides Neutron like L2/L3    services as the quote above implies, then that seems overlaps with FaaS goal    in some degree.

Thanks
Xingjun

“

 

From: An Ho    
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 4:59    PM
To: Sam Hague <shague@...>; 段凯元    <duankaiyuan@...>; Xingjun Chu    <Xingjun.Chu@...>
Cc: project-proposals    <project-proposals@...>; tsc    <tsc@...>
Subject: RE:    [OpenDaylight TSC] [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for    GNT

 

+Adding    FAAS Mailing List

 

It    would be great to see some cross project discussion and collaboration in this    area, especially if there may exist some potential overlap.

 

Best    Regards,

An    Ho

 

 

From: tsc-bounces@...    [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]    On Behalf Of Sam Hague
Sent: Monday,    September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
To: 段凯元
Cc:    project-proposals; tsc
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC]    [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT

 

Was there any discussions on how GNT compares to FaaS [1]?    They seem similar in scope and seems like we had a similar discussion about    scope overlap when FaaS was proposed.

 

Also would GNT use the TTP project or something  similar?

 

[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:FaaS

 

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:25 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:

Hi, everyone

 

What is the result of your vote for the proposal and what's the next    step?

 

 

Thanks,

Kaiyuan

 

----邮件原文----
发件人：Colin Dixon  <colin@...>
收件人："段凯元" <duankaiyuan@...>
抄　送: tsc  <tsc@...>,project-proposals  <project-proposals@...>,"杨红伟" <yanghongwei@...>,dongwenying  <dongwenying@...>,"沈肖" <shenxiao@...>
发送时间：2017-09-07      22:56:30
主题：Re: [Project-proposals] Start the creation review for GNT

 

Here is the proposal: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:General_Network_Topology

 

Previous discussion can be found here:

https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2017-August/thread.html

 

I'll plan to close discussion here on September 13th, so      that we can try to vote by the September 14th TSC meeting and record the      result there.

 

Please ask any more questions you have.

 

Thanks,

--Colin

 

 

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, 段凯元 <duankaiyuan@...> wrote:

Hi, everyone

 

I think we are ready, let's start the creation review for GNT through      email. 

 

Please feel free to ask any questions！And I have already cc all      committers.

 

 

Kaiyuan

_______________________________________________
project-proposals      mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals

 

_______________________________________________
project-proposals    mailing list
project-proposals@...
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals