P4Plugin Proposal
|
ding.rui@...
Hi, everyone, I creat a new project proposal which is about P4 technology. Please review it. Thanks. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:P4_Plugin |
|
|
|
Colin Dixon
Thank you for the proposal. Is the intent for this to participate in the (short) Nitrogen release ending on 9/7/2017. See: If so, this is going to be a pretty whirlwind tour of getting a release done. API freeze including support for Karaf 4 will be no later than 7/14 and code freeze will be no later than 8/14. The alternative is to participate in the Oxygen release, which will target a 3/7/2018 release. --Colin On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:01 PM, <ding.rui@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
ding.rui@...
Thank you for your reply, we have discussed the release schedule of this project, considering the deadline of Nitrogen release, we decide to participate in the Oxygen release, but we want the project to be formally approved by the TSC as soon as possible. 原始邮件 发件人： ＜colin@...＞; 收件人：丁瑞10106591; 抄送人： ＜project-proposals@...＞; 日 期 ：2017年06月08日 22:18 主 题 ：Re: [Project-proposals] P4Plugin Proposal Thank you for the proposal. Is the intent for this to participate in the (short) Nitrogen release ending on 9/7/2017. See: If so, this is going to be a pretty whirlwind tour of getting a release done. API freeze including support for Karaf 4 will be no later than 7/14 and code freeze will be no later than 8/14. The alternative is to participate in the Oxygen release, which will target a 3/7/2018 release. --Colin On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:01 PM, ＜ding.rui@...＞ wrote:
|
|
|
|
Colin Dixon
Understood. The next regularly scheduled TSC meeting after the two-week public review period is 6/22, which is actually the Asia-friendly TSC call time too, which is probably good. Does that time work for you? It would be this: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2017&month=6&day=22&hour=3&min=30&sec=0&p1=771&p2=33&p3=248&p4=283&p5=263&p6=37 You can read through some advice on creation reviews here: --Colin On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:20 PM, <ding.rui@...> wrote:
|
|
|