The good news is this is *after* the summit. --Colin

We kindly remind prospective teams of the latest date a project proposal can be sent to the project-proposals list and still have the required two week public comment period before its project creatio

The request is to archive Plugin2OC, as indicated in the original title of the email and the original link to the termination proposal wiki page: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Archive_Proposals/S

Thank you for your request. We will add the item to this week’s TSC Agenda. Best Regards, An Ho Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:48 AM To: tsc@...; project-proposals@...; plugin2oc-dev@... Subject: [Ope

Dear OpenDaylight Team, We would like to propose a new project for OpenDaylight: Boron Offset 2 titled "Centennial". Centennial is an ONF MWTG (Microwave Transport Group) initiative which emphasizes t

This serves as the beginning of the two-week public comment period to archive the Defense4All project. Full details of the reasons for archiving it can be found on the archive proposal here: https://w

This serves as the beginning of the two-week public comment period to archive the Defense4All project. Full details of the reasons for archiving it can be found on the archive proposal here: https://w

This serves as the beginning of the two-week public comment period to archive the Affinity project. Full details of the reasons for archiving it can be found on the archive proposal here: https://wiki

Dear all, Please find here under a link towards the description of a new ODL project focusing on path computing for OTN/WDM networks with still having in mind moving to fully converged path computatio

Good morning, We would like to propose a new project to extend ODL southbound functionality via JSON RPC 2.0. The project proposal has been posted on the ODL wiki: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/P

​+1 good idea.​ -- Thanks Anil

Hi, Thank you for agreeing with me, Weiqiang Cheng. I understand that MPLS-TP YANG models are in your scope. But I am guessing our MPLS-TP model is fundamentally different from MPLS-TP Solution team’s

Hi Colin， Because MPLS-TP solution project and MPLS-TP service project are very similar, I suggest TSC review the both projects at the same time. 10 am pacific is 1:00 am in Beijing that is a little b

Given that there is a PoC alread, I'm guessing that you will need to have an incoming code intellectual property review (IPR). Phil will help you with that if you send him a zip file or tarball with c

Hi, We create a new project proposal for MPLS-TP solution as following link: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:MPLS-TP-Solution Any comments or suggestion are welcomed. Best Regards

Forwarding to project proposals for posterity. The version on the TSC list can be found here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-March/004953.html --Colin ---------- Forwarded message -

Hi TSC, Koby Aizer & I would like to propose this project for the Boron release: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:EPC_OpenFlow_Extension I kindly ask you to schedule a creation rev

Sam, Question... in the scope... what constitutes 'network virtualization' in your mind? (trying to wrap my head around the scope :) ). Ed

Hi， I agree with Justin. It is better to have separate projects. One point I want to clarify is that the MPLS-TP YANG models for NBI is also in our scope. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng 发件人: 박세형 [mailto:labry@..

Hi, I’m cc’ing tsc mailing list to get a creation review. We carefully searched for a common ground to collaborate with China Mobile. But as far as I understand, it seems like our common ground is lim