toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
It is out of question. Your suggestion is reasonable.
From: yang.r.yang@... [mailto:yang.r.yang@...]
On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 8:57 AM
Cc: alto-dev@...; Wendy Roome; Xiao SHI; Xin Wang (Tongji)
Subject: Re: [alto-dev] Fwd: [OpenDaylight TSC] Fwd: Re: New committers
It is great to have your contribution! I know that you have contributed an ALTO client when we conducted the previous interop in July. My feeling is that after we conduct a code review and you check in the client as a good part of ALTO/ODL,
it will be a good base for you to become a committer. How does this sound?
Wendy/Xin: what do you think?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Chenguohai <chenguohai@...> wrote:
I want to be committer and I shall do more on ALTO.
Dear Wendy, Xiao, Xin,
May I propose the following changes to committers:
1. Proposal: Add Kai, Shu, Jensen, as new committers.
Justification (copy from Kai's summary):
"Jensen has submitted a lot of commits on improving the code quality  by writing tests and fixing bugs and he is now a key member of the development team. Kai ans Shu have implemented most components of ALTO Lithium release [2, 3]. They are also the
actual project leaders of this project currently."
Vote (please vote +1, 0, -1). My vote is +1
2. Proposal: Add Guohai as a new committer after ALTO client check in:
Justification: Guohai has made substantial contribution to write an ALTO client. If we check in as part of the ALTO project, we should include Guohai (Robert) as a committer.
Robert: Do you want to do so?
Vote: Pending Guohai check in.
3. Proposal: Add Junzhuo as a new committer after new ALTO version check in.
Vote: Pending Junzhuo check in.
4. Remove Xiao from the committers, as Xiao no longer participates in the ALTO project.
Please share your opinions when you can.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Y. Richard Yang <yry@...>
Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [alto-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] Fwd: Re: New committers
To: Colin Dixon <colin@...>
Cc: Gao Kai <gaok12@...>, "alto-dev@..." <alto-dev@...>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Colin Dixon <colin@...> wrote:
There were 4 committers listed:
* Xiao Shi (Shixiao) (Yale University)
* Xin (Tony) Wang (Tonywang) (Tongji University)
* Y. Richard Yang (Yrichardyang) (Yale/Tongji University)
* Wendy Roome (Wdroome) (Bell Labs)
Those four people should have full committer rights in gerrit and should also be voting members of the project when it comes to adding new committers.
Along those lines, I have 3 requests:
1.) Remove Huaming Guo as an initial committer fomr the project proposal, since he wasn't one.
2.) If it's possible get the other current committers (Xiao, Xin, and Wendy) to vote on the newly proposed committers.
3.) Remove the new committers (Shu, Kai, Guohai, and Yichen) from the main page until they are voted on by the project committers and approved by the TSC.
The three requests make sense. Let us follow the procedure and get them done soon.
Let me know if that makes sense.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Y. Richard Yang <yry@...> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Colin Dixon <colin@...> wrote:
I think there is a misunderstanding here. When we listed the names on the preceding Web page, we thought those names would be contributors, i.e., they would participate in the project,
but without the ability to commit in the sense of git approval. Hence, I am the only git committer/approver. This also explains why we added Huaming without seeking the approval of TSC. Does this clarify?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Gao Kai <gaok12@...> wrote:
We have carried out a public vote for three new committers in ALTO project . Richard, the only committer of ALTO project at the moment, has voted +1 for all three candidates.
TSC mailing list
alto-dev mailing list
| Professor of Computer Science |