This group is locked. No changes can be made to the group while it is locked.
Re: [alto] Interop test
Y. Richard Yang
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Wendy Roome <w.roome@...> wrote:
This makes sense. We can specify the validation condition for the interop:
- For network map, the only unspecified value then is the "vtag" field, and the interop specifies the assert, which is based on consistency between data and IRD.
- For cost map, the only unspecified is the exact "dependent-vtags", and your validation makes sense.
This is a reasonable validation. An issue is that RFC7285 specifies only that "An ALTO server MUST support at least one of the following modes: numerical and ordinal." I believe that RFC7285 chose to not specify the consistency between the two modes. Hence, this is beyond compliance, right? Hence, I feel that separating RFC7285-conforming and beyond can be helpful.