George, The issue should be fixed. Regards, Kai On 17/06/15 14:56, George Zhao wrote:

Thanks for the quick reply, Colin. We will send the error messages to Ed to figure out the issue. Thanks! Richard

No, can you work with Ed to figure out why they're failing? On Jun 17, 2015 1:02 AM, "Gao Kai" <godrickk@...> wrote:

Should the patches be merged even they failed on jenkins? On 17/06/15 05:20, Colin Dixon wrote:

Dear Colin, Sorry for the delay. Kai is working on it right now and will fix the issue soon. Thanks! Richard

Thanks, please do let me know it is done, if time permits, I will kick off a new build for you, otherwise, your patch will be picked up in tomorrow’s RC1 build. From: yang.r.yang@...

George, Luis, Sorry for the delay--we were having some email delays as we travel. Kai is fixing the patches right now and will respond shortly. Thanks! Richard --

ALTO committers, Please respond to Luis’s request. Thanks, George From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ecelgp@...] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 5:12 PM To: George Zhao Cc: release;

If you look here, you'll find two blocking bugs having to do with features files not being set up

Hello, You receive this email because your project hasn’t reported RC0 test status, please take time to do so. RC0 can be downloaded:

You can typically fix that by doing a git commit --amend instead of a normal git commit. That way your current work gets folded into the previous commit rather than created as a second one. --Colin

Sorry I forgot to reset the change-Id. I'll abandon 22316 and resubmit the patch to 20762 asap. --Kai On 12/06/15 04:21, Colin Dixon wrote:

It looks like you created two patches: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/22316/ depends on the existing one: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/20762/ If you want, I can flatten the two

I fixed that problem in patch set 6: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/20762/6 I also noted that in patch set 5 you again introduced the dependency on this

No worries. I just didn't want to miss anything. It appears as though you're most recent patch set didn't build because you defined the read-restconf label twice. In general, my suggestion is to make

George, Thanks for the note. Kai and I will work with Robert to merge it. Thanks! Richard _____________________________

That is how things should look like. Thanks for your work. I checked my bash history and figured out how things went wrong. I really appreciate your help and apologize for the

A few points: 1.) It seems like 20762 depends on 20475 (patch set 2). 2.) It seems like there are edits present in 21600 that aren't in the combination of 20762 and 20475—specifically removing the

20475 has been abandoned. Sorry for the mess. On 04/06/15 03:08, Colin Dixon wrote:

As far as I can tell there have been four submitted patches for ALTO