|
ALTO Boron M5 Status
ALTO Boron M5 Status
1. Please provide updates on any previously-incomplete items from prior milestone readouts.
N/A
2.
ALTO Boron M5 Status
1. Please provide updates on any previously-incomplete items from prior milestone readouts.
N/A
2.
|
By
Gao Kai <gaok12@...>
·
#402
·
|
|
Re: [release] distribution still not good
FYI
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [release] distribution still not good
FYI
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [release] distribution still not good
|
By
Gao Kai <gaok12@...>
·
#401
·
|
|
Re: Distribution Size Failures: ALTO
Gao Kai <gaok12@...> wrote:
It may be worth checking whether the version of Jetty bundled with
Karaf is suitable (8.1.15.v20140411 as of Karaf 3.0.6, available as the
"jetty" feature
Gao Kai <gaok12@...> wrote:
It may be worth checking whether the version of Jetty bundled with
Karaf is suitable (8.1.15.v20140411 as of Karaf 3.0.6, available as the
"jetty" feature
|
By
Stephen Kitt <skitt@...>
·
#400
·
|
|
Re: Distribution Size Failures: ALTO
Hello An Ho,
I replied to the thread in the release mailing list [1] about the issue. We found that tsdr alone uses two different Jetty versions,
Hello An Ho,
I replied to the thread in the release mailing list [1] about the issue. We found that tsdr alone uses two different Jetty versions,
|
By
Gao Kai <gaok12@...>
·
#399
·
|
|
Distribution Size Failures: ALTO
Hi ALTO,
We are currently running into distribution size failures [1] where the Boron Common Karaf Distirbution is greater than 512MB. In order to decrease the size of the distribution, we believe
Hi ALTO,
We are currently running into distribution size failures [1] where the Boron Common Karaf Distirbution is greater than 512MB. In order to decrease the size of the distribution, we believe
|
By
an.ho@huawei.com
·
#398
·
|
|
Re: [alto-design] alto-fcimap feature request
I agree, but to proceed we need to have someone investigate the related documents, especially how to gather the information. Also, do we
I agree, but to proceed we need to have someone investigate the related documents, especially how to gather the information. Also, do we
|
By
Gao Kai
·
#397
·
|
|
Re: [alto-design] alto-fcimap feature request
I think it is a good idea. I will discuss with alto-dev group and try to add this feature into the release plan of OpenDaylight Carbon.
@Kai: what do you think about?
Best,
Jensen
I think it is a good idea. I will discuss with alto-dev group and try to add this feature into the release plan of OpenDaylight Carbon.
@Kai: what do you think about?
Best,
Jensen
|
By
Jensen Zhang
·
#396
·
|
|
Re: Alto merge job failing
Okay. Thank you very much!
Jensen
Okay. Thank you very much!
Jensen
|
By
Jensen Zhang
·
#395
·
|
|
Re: Alto merge job failing
Looks like an Intermittent issue. I just ran a remerge and it passed.
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/alto-merge-boron/50/
In the future if you see a connection refused to Nexus it's
Looks like an Intermittent issue. I just ran a remerge and it passed.
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/alto-merge-boron/50/
In the future if you see a connection refused to Nexus it's
|
By
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...>
·
#394
·
|
|
Re: Alto merge job failing
Hi Thanh,
Thanks for your help. It is indeed a missing license header issue. I think this should fix it:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42716/
But when we try to merge this patch, the merge
Hi Thanh,
Thanks for your help. It is indeed a missing license header issue. I think this should fix it:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42716/
But when we try to merge this patch, the merge
|
By
Jensen Zhang
·
#393
·
|
|
Re: Alto merge job failing
Looks like a file is missing license headers. This should fix it:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/42870
Regards,
Thanh
Looks like a file is missing license headers. This should fix it:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/42870
Regards,
Thanh
|
By
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...>
·
#392
·
|
|
Alto merge job failing
Hi alto devs,
Your merge job started to fail recently [1]. Please address the issue before it hits the integration distribution.
BR/Luis
[1]
Hi alto devs,
Your merge job started to fail recently [1]. Please address the issue before it hits the integration distribution.
BR/Luis
[1]
|
By
Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
·
#391
·
|
|
Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] committing to an outline of a Carbon release plan
FYI
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] committing to an outline of a
FYI
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] committing to an outline of a
|
By
Gao Kai <gaok12@...>
·
#390
·
|
|
alto-fcimap feature request
Hi all,
One outcome of this IETF is that ALTO introduces the footprint and capability interface (fci) map, to support the CDNi use case. I feel that this is an important use case and hence may I
Hi all,
One outcome of this IETF is that ALTO introduces the footprint and capability interface (fci) map, to support the CDNi use case. I feel that this is an important use case and hence may I
|
By
Y. Richard Yang
·
#389
·
|
|
Getting errors in ALTO feature.
When using maven to resolve the dependencies of Application Layer Traffic Optimization in eclipse oomph after its installation through its installer I'm getting errors of tool-1.7.0.jar not found. I'm
When using maven to resolve the dependencies of Application Layer Traffic Optimization in eclipse oomph after its installation through its installer I'm getting errors of tool-1.7.0.jar not found. I'm
|
By
Asjad Sohail <asjadsohail@...>
·
#388
·
|
|
Re: [release] Distribution size issue
Jensen, can you take a look at this?
You can download tsdr and use dependency:tree to see what jetty version we/they are using.
Ours is 8.1.19. Haven't been able to see theirs at
Jensen, can you take a look at this?
You can download tsdr and use dependency:tree to see what jetty version we/they are using.
Ours is 8.1.19. Haven't been able to see theirs at
|
By
Gao Kai <gaok12@...>
·
#387
·
|
|
Re: [Action Needed] Upgrade ietf-{inet,yang}-types
An Ho,
Copy that.
Thanks!
Regards,
Kai
On 12/07/16 01:55, An Ho wrote:
An Ho,
Copy that.
Thanks!
Regards,
Kai
On 12/07/16 01:55, An Ho wrote:
|
By
Gao Kai <gaok12@...>
·
#386
·
|
|
[Action Needed] Upgrade ietf-{inet,yang}-types
Hi ALTO Team,
There are plans to upgrade ietf-inet-types@2010-09-24 and ietf-yang-types@2010-09-24 (RFC 6021) to ietf-inet-types-2013-07-15 and ietf-yang-types@2013-07-15 (RFC 6991) in the Boron
Hi ALTO Team,
There are plans to upgrade ietf-inet-types@2010-09-24 and ietf-yang-types@2010-09-24 (RFC 6021) to ietf-inet-types-2013-07-15 and ietf-yang-types@2013-07-15 (RFC 6991) in the Boron
|
By
an.ho@huawei.com
·
#385
·
|
|
Re: [release] considering documentation migration to ReStructuredText/Sphinx from AsciiDoc/Asciidoctor
Jensen, Xiao and other folks,
Please see the e-mail and prepare for migrations ahead of time.
Thanks!
-------- Forwarded Message
Jensen, Xiao and other folks,
Please see the e-mail and prepare for migrations ahead of time.
Thanks!
-------- Forwarded Message
|
By
Gao Kai <gaok12@...>
·
#384
·
|
|
Re: [release] Boron autorelease fails: alto, l2switch, blueprint
Thanh,
I've contacted the committers to accept the patch. It should be done within minutes. Sorry for the trouble.
Regards,
Kai
On
Thanh,
I've contacted the committers to accept the patch. It should be done within minutes. Sorry for the trouble.
Regards,
Kai
On
|
By
Gao Kai
·
#383
·
|