ALTO 1. The ALTO project formally joins the OpenDaylight Carbon Simultaneous Release and agrees to the activities and timeline documented on the Carbon Release Plan page [1]. 2. Project offset: Offset

Dear TSC members, The ALTO project is trying to update the committer list and get prepared for the Carbon release. Currently there are four committers in the list but some have been inactive for more

Hi Alto-devs, I have been inactive in ODL development since over a year ago. Please remove me from the committer list. Thank you! Best, Xiao

Folks, Unfortunately I have not been able to actively contribute to this project, and I don¹t think that will change any time soon. So I would like to be removed from the list of committers. - Wendy R

Dear alto committers, would one of you be willing to merge https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45591/ ? we need you to do this because you are the last project remaining which is blocking https://

Hi K. Gao, J. Jensen Zhang, Y. Richard Yang, and ALTO Team, Please vote GO/NOGO on the spreadsheet below by filling out Column B next to your project name: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImt

For the ALTO release review Monday morning, I have the following analysis of their upstream CSIT for boron, using the most recent boron job result. please note that I do not know if all delivered feat

Do we have someone to update the documentation? -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [release] [ACTION] projects missing documentation for Boron Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:45:04 -0400 From: Col

ALTO Boron M5 Status 1. Please provide updates on any previously-incomplete items from prior milestone readouts. N/A 2. Has your project met code freeze, i.e., only bug fixes are allowed from now on?

FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [release] distribution still not good Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:57:56 -0400 From: Colin Dixon <colin@...> To: Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> CC: release@..

Hi ALTO, We are currently running into distribution size failures [1] where the Boron Common Karaf Distirbution is greater than 512MB. In order to decrease the size of the distribution, we believe the

I think it is a good idea. I will discuss with alto-dev group and try to add this feature into the release plan of OpenDaylight Carbon. @Kai: what do you think about? Best, Jensen

Hi alto devs, Your merge job started to fail recently [1]. Please address the issue before it hits the integration distribution. BR/Luis [1] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/Merge-Boron/jo

FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] committing to an outline of a Carbon release plan Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:36:55 -0400 From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@.

Hi all, One outcome of this IETF is that ALTO introduces the footprint and capability interface (fci) map, to support the CDNi use case. I feel that this is an important use case and hence may I reque

When using maven to resolve the dependencies of Application Layer Traffic Optimization in eclipse oomph after its installation through its installer I'm getting errors of tool-1.7.0.jar not found. I'm

Jensen, can you take a look at this? You can download tsdr and use dependency:tree to see what jetty version we/they are using. Ours is 8.1.19. Haven't been able to see theirs at the moment. --------

Hi ALTO Team, There are plans to upgrade ietf-inet-types@2010-09-24 and ietf-yang-types@2010-09-24 (RFC 6021) to ietf-inet-types-2013-07-15 and ietf-yang-types@2013-07-15 (RFC 6991) in the Boron relea

Jensen, Xiao and other folks, Please see the e-mail and prepare for migrations ahead of time. Thanks! -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [release] considering documentation migration to

Vratko, The current patch might do now, at least for Boron. Currently we can work around it but in the long run we may still need to enable reactive routing. Actually we don't care much about ARP pack