This group is locked. No changes can be made to the group while it is locked.
Date
1 - 8 of 8
CAPWAP Release Review
|
an.ho@huawei.com
Hi Mahesh Govind and CAPWAP Team,
This is the formal release review of the CAPWAP project over email. Please reply with links to the Release Review and Release Notes of the project as well as any additional comments regarding the project in Boron. TSC members, committers, and the OpenDaylight community are welcome to offer any questions, comments, or actions that the project should address. Best Regards, An Ho |
|
|
|
Abi
Hello An Ho, I had already updated the Boron tracking sheet which you have shared @ Release notes: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CAPWAP:Boron:Release_Notes Release review: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CAPWAP:Boron:Release_Review As of Boron, our focus was to add CAPWAP functionality (Protocol parsing, Various Message handling, Scalable infrastructure using Akka etc) into the project. It is far from perfect and the external interfaces remain unchanged. We expect major changes in the interfaces along with end to end working functionality in the upcoming release. Please do revert back in case you have additional queries. Regards, Abi On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:11 AM, An Ho <An.Ho@...> wrote: Hi Mahesh Govind and CAPWAP Team, |
|
|
|
Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...>
fyi, the CSIT jobs for capwap are not meeting system test expectations so all features
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
for capwap should be released as "experimental". Thanks, JamO On 09/07/2016 09:11 PM, Abi Varghese wrote:
Hello An Ho, |
|
|
|
Abi
Hello Jamo, I think setting an experimental status to CAPWAP is fine. Regards, Abi On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote: fyi, the CSIT jobs for capwap are not meeting system test expectations so all features |
|
|
|
Colin Dixon <colin@...>
First, I think An will tell you this, but I'll say it first, you should have your features follow the template like here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP_Plugin:Boron:Release_Review#Features Second, I see that you have copies of the docs on the wiki, which are also here: http://docs.opendaylight.org/en/stable-boron/user-guide/capwap-user-guide.html http://docs.opendaylight.org/en/stable-boron/developer-guide/capwap-developer-guide.html It might be good to just link to those. Cheers, --ColinOn Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Abi Varghese <abi.varghese@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Abi
Hello Colin, I have rectified the points you have mentioned in the release review page. Thanks, Abi On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Colin Dixon <colin@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Colin Dixon <colin@...>
Looks good. --ColinOn Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Abi Varghese <abi.varghese@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
an.ho@huawei.com
CAPWAP looks good to me given the experimental tags for all features. I have no further questions.
#info CAPWAP approved for Boron. Congratulations!
Best Regards, An Ho
From: Colin Dixon [mailto:colin@...]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 10:09 AM To: Abi Varghese Cc: Jamo Luhrsen; An Ho; capwap-dev@...; release@...; vu3mmg@...; Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Subject: Re: CAPWAP Release Review
Looks good. --Colin
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Abi Varghese <abi.varghese@...> wrote: Hello Colin,
Thanks,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Colin Dixon <colin@...> wrote: First, I think An will tell you this, but I'll say it first, you should have your features follow the template like here: Second, I see that you have copies of the docs on the wiki, which are also here: It might be good to just link to those.
Cheers, --Colin
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Abi Varghese <abi.varghese@...> wrote: Hello Jamo,
I think setting an experimental status to CAPWAP is fine.
Regards,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...> wrote: fyi, the CSIT jobs for capwap are not meeting system test expectations so all features Hello An Ho,
|
|
|