Hi Madhu, A couple of quick clarification on future changes - Soon after the RELEASE version, we would also have the subsequent SNAPSHOT version - I understand that release-plugin provides that discip

https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300 Ed

Hi Ryan and Anees: The attached file contains a list of filenames within your git repo that have been identified as *not* having a License/Copyright header. That is not to say that you *should* put a

Hi Devs, Apologies on the long email again. I cant think of any better way to communicate this kind of info. This email is also updated in wiki https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:

Just a final note, if the intention for next release is to have a better harmonization among virtualization apps, I think option 1) goes more on the right direction.

Ok, I'll schedule a meeting to decide resolution for next release.

So I see the value of this... But what about Affinity? Ed

Anees, I would say OpenStack already is somewhat aware of the details of the virtualization implementation, since you get to choose between VLAN, GRE, and VXLAN tunneling. So I agree with Madhu that a

As we've discussed at some length, Affinity is not in the same category of function as the virtualization implementations, and also doesn't implement the Neutron APIs, so I don't think the issue of mu

So from what I understand from this and other previous conversations, it looks like there are 2 trends for the Virtualization edition: 1) Run all apps together but try to use only one virtualization a

Hi Suchi, Good questions. I will not pretend to be an expert in this area as I have had little time to dig into these projects unfortunately. My reaction/response is therefore one of practicality. We

In addition to the basic metadata setting/getting, the affinity engine has a way to set forwarding rules for traffic redirection. This is the feature required for Radware. We have a couple of options

Hi Kyle, OpenDove, VTN & OVSDB devs, Since we all have integrations completed with the Neutron nb-apis and these southbound drivers (ovsdb, open-dove, vtn) cannot co-exist in the same virtualization e

Hi Madhu, I completely agree with your opinion. Regards, Hideyuki Tai

Hi all, Sorry to come back to this subject again but what is the final conclusion here? Do we really need to start/stop OSGi bundles in Virtualization edition or is it enough if we do not use 2 Virtua

Anees, I have to disagree with you on the need for the Affinity Service to touch the network. Yes, we do not need yet another virtualization implementation, but this is not about virtualization is abo

Resending with a link instead of an attachment ---- Anees, I have to disagree with you on the need for the Affinity Service to touch the network. Yes, we do not need yet another virtualization impleme

Unfortunately, I couldn't attend the last TSC call where the issue of conflicting services in the virtualization edition was discussed further. But in reading Dave's notes, it seems there was some exp

Hideyuki is exactly right -- we added southbound actions for one example affinity -- redirecting a path of flows through a function chain and set openflow priority = 3 to give it higher priority above

Hi all, Please let me confirm the specification of the interface between OpenDaylight Controller and the ML2 driver for OpenDaylight Controller. It seems to me that opendove assumes that fixed_ips att