Re: [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev] openflow performance regression

Tony Tkacik

The patch

is not even in the code-path of throughput testing, since change was to clustered datastore

And for throughput testing suite is using dropallpacketsrpc on

Which  is based on RPCs and Notifications only.




From: openflowjava-dev-bounces@... [mailto:openflowjava-dev-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Luis Gomez
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 5:01 PM
To: Luhrsen, Jamo
Cc: openflowplugin-dev@...; integration-dev@...; openflowjava-dev@...; Mathieu Lemay
Subject: Re: [openflowjava-dev] [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev] openflow performance regression


Hi Jamo. The patch that reduced the performance is:



You could not see this clearly in the CI because projects that have branched to stable/lithium like controller or yangtools are not triggering any test in CI.






On May 6, 2015, at 7:07 AM, Luhrsen, Jamo <james.luhrsen@...> wrote:


I notified openflowplugin-dev about this yesterday.  I was assuming this might have
been the patch [1]  that reduced the performance, as it was what looked like the
patch that triggered the first test that saw the drop.  But, that was not a commit
from Robert, so now I’m not sure.

also, please see the Lithium re-design performance plots [2], just to be able to



On May 6, 2015, at 6:15 AM, Colin Dixon <colin@...<mailto:colin@...>> wrote:

I just heard that from Tony. Sorry for that.


On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Mathieu Lemay <mlemay@...<mailto:mlemay@...>> wrote:
Yes I think Robert sent out an e-mail on re-enabling notifications...


On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Colin Dixon <colin@...<mailto:colin@...>> wrote:

Sometime around 19 hours ago it looks like our performance went off a cliff from ~100k flows per second to ~20k flows per second...


dev mailing list


Mathieu Lemay
President & CEO
Inocybe Technologies

integration-dev mailing list

integration-dev mailing list


Join { to automatically receive all group messages.