|
Re: [controller-dev] [releng] Distribution creation job
Luis,
I thought that this was being handled by having in the integration cfg the jobs it depended on so it could run integration jobs like every other
project does (see example of controller).
I would
Luis,
I thought that this was being handled by having in the integration cfg the jobs it depended on so it could run integration jobs like every other
project does (see example of controller).
I would
|
By
Edward Warnicke <hagbard@...>
·
#441
·
|
|
Re: [yangtools-dev] [releng] Distribution creation job
Hello,
I am not sure I follow what exactly is the plan here. Is there going to be a centralized 'this is what integration looks like' job? Furthermore how does this interact
Hello,
I am not sure I follow what exactly is the plan here. Is there going to be a centralized 'this is what integration looks like' job? Furthermore how does this interact
|
By
Robert Varga <nite@...>
·
#440
·
|
|
[releng] Distribution creation job
Hi all,
I am pushing following patches to releng repo:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/15689/ - yangtools
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/15691/ -
Hi all,
I am pushing following patches to releng repo:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/15689/ - yangtools
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/15691/ -
|
By
Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
·
#439
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Vendor Extensions for openflowplugin
Hi Shuva,
please have a look
Hi Shuva,
please have a look
|
By
Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - Pantheon Technologies SRO@Cisco) <mirehak@...>
·
#438
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Vendor Extensions for openflowplugin
Hi Shuva,
basically there is a couple of wiki pages regarding vendor extensions:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Backlog:Extensibility
- mainly part Dependencies and
Hi Shuva,
basically there is a couple of wiki pages regarding vendor extensions:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Backlog:Extensibility
- mainly part Dependencies and
|
By
Michal Polkorab
·
#437
·
|
|
Vendor Extensions for openflowplugin
Hi all,
Is there a way to implement vendor extensions without doing intrusive changes to the openflowplugin? If yes, what is the template regarding it
Thanks
Shuva
Hi all,
Is there a way to implement vendor extensions without doing intrusive changes to the openflowplugin? If yes, what is the template regarding it
Thanks
Shuva
|
By
Shuva Kar <shuva.jyoti.kar@...>
·
#436
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
Thanks Anil
By
abhishek jain <ashujain9727@...>
·
#435
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
As per my understanding base edition also supports of13, because openflowplugin project is also part of the base edition. Others please correct me if i am wrong.
Ideally virtualization edition
As per my understanding base edition also supports of13, because openflowplugin project is also part of the base edition. Others please correct me if i am wrong.
Ideally virtualization edition
|
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#434
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
Hi Anil
Thanks
The Hydrogen virtualization release supports OF1.3 and hydrogen base does not.
However the issue what I'm facing with hydrogen virtualization using OF1.3 is that it it doesn't install
Hi Anil
Thanks
The Hydrogen virtualization release supports OF1.3 and hydrogen base does not.
However the issue what I'm facing with hydrogen virtualization using OF1.3 is that it it doesn't install
|
By
abhishek jain <ashujain9727@...>
·
#433
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
Yes, it does, but for that you will have to start the controller using ./run.sh -of13 flag. It will enable openflowplugin project that supports openflow 1.3 protocol.
Thanks
Anil
--
Thanks
Anil
Yes, it does, but for that you will have to start the controller using ./run.sh -of13 flag. It will enable openflowplugin project that supports openflow 1.3 protocol.
Thanks
Anil
--
Thanks
Anil
|
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#432
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
Hi Anil
Thanks.I'll try the above suggestion.
One final question.
Does the opendaylight hyrdogen release supports OF1.3?
Hi Anil
Thanks.I'll try the above suggestion.
One final question.
Does the opendaylight hyrdogen release supports OF1.3?
|
By
abhishek jain <ashujain9727@...>
·
#431
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
I believe you can use YangUI tool in dlux gui to directly push the flow to the data store and that will eventually get install on switch.
Hopefully following link can help
I believe you can use YangUI tool in dlux gui to directly push the flow to the data store and that will eventually get install on switch.
Hopefully following link can help
|
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#429
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
Hi Anil
One more quiry.Is there any method to set flows from Helium Opendaylight Controller through GUI as in Hydrogen.
Hi Anil
One more quiry.Is there any method to set flows from Helium Opendaylight Controller through GUI as in Hydrogen.
|
By
abhishek jain <ashujain9727@...>
·
#430
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
Hi Anil,
Thank you for answering my question.
The problem was a missing "setOrder" to the OutputAction.
Thanks,
Yair
Hi Anil,
Thank you for answering my question.
The problem was a missing "setOrder" to the OutputAction.
Thanks,
Yair
|
By
Yair Zinger <yair.zinger@...>
·
#428
·
|
|
Re: [controller-dev] Output to port flow action using Helium
Hi Yair,
Yes i believe this is the correct format of URI for node connector, assuming that OUTPUT_ENTIRE_PACKET enum is something that is defined in your application code. If it does, then can you
Hi Yair,
Yes i believe this is the correct format of URI for node connector, assuming that OUTPUT_ENTIRE_PACKET enum is something that is defined in your application code. If it does, then can you
|
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#426
·
|
|
Output to port flow action using Helium
Hi,
We started using Helium SR and we're having trouble with setting flows output to port actions.
In Hydrogen we used OutputAction and setOutputNodeConnector using "openflow:switchId:portId" URI, for
Hi,
We started using Helium SR and we're having trouble with setting flows output to port actions.
In Hydrogen we used OutputAction and setOutputNodeConnector using "openflow:switchId:portId" URI, for
|
By
Yair Zinger <yair.zinger@...>
·
#427
·
|
|
Re: Change in openflowjava[master]: Migrate OFFrameDecoder to LengthFieldBasedDecoder v2
Thanks.
Otherwise, the stock netty LengthFieldBasedDecoder also contains a couple of checks for corrupted frames which are missing in the OFFrameDecoder.
These can catch if someone feeds ODL a frame
Thanks.
Otherwise, the stock netty LengthFieldBasedDecoder also contains a couple of checks for corrupted frames which are missing in the OFFrameDecoder.
These can catch if someone feeds ODL a frame
|
By
Anton Ivanov
·
#424
·
|
|
Re: Change in openflowjava[master]: Migrate OFFrameDecoder to LengthFieldBasedDecoder v2
Yes, I see. The problem is in controller features: No feature named 'odl-mdsal-common' with version '1.2.0-SNAPSHOT' available
Those have been probably updated. I will try to investigate what happened
Yes, I see. The problem is in controller features: No feature named 'odl-mdsal-common' with version '1.2.0-SNAPSHOT' available
Those have been probably updated. I will try to investigate what happened
|
By
Michal Polkorab
·
#423
·
|
|
Re: Change in openflowjava[master]: Migrate OFFrameDecoder to LengthFieldBasedDecoder v2
Removing jenkings-releng/Adding openflowjava-dev.
OK.
I will double check the error/exception handling code in LengthFieldBasedDecoder vs OFFrameDecoder.
With the zero copy in place they are now
Removing jenkings-releng/Adding openflowjava-dev.
OK.
I will double check the error/exception handling code in LengthFieldBasedDecoder vs OFFrameDecoder.
With the zero copy in place they are now
|
By
Anton Ivanov
·
#425
·
|
|
Re: ATTENTION: Tagging Helium SR1.1 security release (2014-12-22)
Hi Michal,
Looks good on my end. Thanks!
Thanh
On 2 January 2015 at 16:34, Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - Pantheon Technologies SRO at Cisco) <mirehak@...> wrote:
Hi Michal,
Looks good on my end. Thanks!
Thanh
On 2 January 2015 at 16:34, Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - Pantheon Technologies SRO at Cisco) <mirehak@...> wrote:
|
By
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...>
·
#422
·
|