|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] StackedSegment SEGMENT_SIZE = 4096
Hi Mageshwaran,
SEGMENT_SIZE must be power of 2 in order to fit into max long (in case that message xid reaches 2^64). But that is just an implementation detail.
Queue segments are arrays and amount
Hi Mageshwaran,
SEGMENT_SIZE must be power of 2 in order to fit into max long (in case that message xid reaches 2^64). But that is just an implementation detail.
Queue segments are arrays and amount
|
By
Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <mirehak@...>
·
#761
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] StackedSegment SEGMENT_SIZE = 4096
+openflowjava
--
Thanks
Anil
+openflowjava
--
Thanks
Anil
|
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#760
·
|
|
Carbon M4 offset 1 status - openflowjava
Hello,
please see Openflow Protocol Library M4 status below.
Openflowjava:
1. Please provide updates on any previously-incomplete items from prior milestone readouts.
- None previously
Hello,
please see Openflow Protocol Library M4 status below.
Openflowjava:
1. Please provide updates on any previously-incomplete items from prior milestone readouts.
- None previously
|
By
Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <mirehak@...>
·
#759
·
|
|
Re: Barrier Message Timeout - 500ms - Rational behind the value
Hi Muthukrishnan,
there is no golden standard behind this value. Setting it to 100ms or even lower value will result into low latency system but this also decreases throughput of system.
If you have
Hi Muthukrishnan,
there is no golden standard behind this value. Setting it to 100ms or even lower value will result into low latency system but this also decreases throughput of system.
If you have
|
By
Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <mirehak@...>
·
#758
·
|
|
Barrier Message Timeout - 500ms - Rational behind the value
Dear Team ,
I have been working in Lithium and Boron Stable Version .
Lets take Boron , In openflowplugin.cfg default timer for barrier message is 500ms is there any
rational behind the same ? why
Dear Team ,
I have been working in Lithium and Boron Stable Version .
Lets take Boron , In openflowplugin.cfg default timer for barrier message is 500ms is there any
rational behind the same ? why
|
By
Muthukrishnan T
·
#757
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OF TLS support in Boron
Thanks Vishal,
It works with the new config files after changing TCP->TLS and removing the last line: <cipher-suites></cipher-suites>
I just updated TLS
Thanks Vishal,
It works with the new config files after changing TCP->TLS and removing the last line: <cipher-suites></cipher-suites>
I just updated TLS
|
By
Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
·
#756
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OF TLS support in Boron
Hi Luis,
Based off the patch, the file where you configure TLS is now different. The file location will be:
Hi Luis,
Based off the patch, the file where you configure TLS is now different. The file location will be:
|
By
Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...>
·
#755
·
|
|
Re: OF TLS support in Boron
Actually, I think these are the patches that changed the TLS configuration:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45758/
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45839
Can anyone please explain how
Actually, I think these are the patches that changed the TLS configuration:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45758/
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45839
Can anyone please explain how
|
By
Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
·
#754
·
|
|
Re: OF TLS support in Boron
I see something changed here:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46518/
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46519/
Can anyone explain how to configure TLS after these changes?
BR/Luis
I see something changed here:
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46518/
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46519/
Can anyone explain how to configure TLS after these changes?
BR/Luis
|
By
Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
·
#753
·
|
|
Re: OF TLS support in Boron
Yes - please open a bug. We can always increase or lower the priority later based on more investigations.
Yes - please open a bug. We can always increase or lower the priority later based on more investigations.
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#752
·
|
|
OF TLS support in Boron
FYI, I have just tried this instruction below on Boron and it does not work (it works in Beryllium). Does anybody know if something changed Beryllium -> Boron with regards to TLS support or should I
FYI, I have just tried this instruction below on Boron and it does not work (it works in Beryllium). Does anybody know if something changed Beryllium -> Boron with regards to TLS support or should I
|
By
Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>
·
#751
·
|
|
OpenDaylight packet distribution algorithm
Hi Everyone,
I was googling for a while but was not successful to find a solid answer for my question, and I would greatly appreciate your comments.
I was wondering to know what 'switch
Hi Everyone,
I was googling for a while but was not successful to find a solid answer for my question, and I would greatly appreciate your comments.
I was wondering to know what 'switch
|
By
Mohamad Darianian <mohamad.drnn@...>
·
#750
·
|
|
Re: bug 5173 - "deserialization failed" WARN messages
Hi Michal,
Thanks for your help on this. We have since tested the CSIT jobs with ODL distributions carrying the Bug 7071 fix and have not observed the “deserialization failed” WARN messages.
Hi Michal,
Thanks for your help on this. We have since tested the CSIT jobs with ODL distributions carrying the Bug 7071 fix and have not observed the “deserialization failed” WARN messages.
|
By
Bertrand Low <Bertrand.Low@...>
·
#749
·
|
|
OpenFlowJava M3 Status
Hello,
please see Openflow Protocol Library (Openflowjava) M3 status below:
Functionality Freeze:
1. Final list of externally consumable APIs defined: Yes
2. Are all your inter-project dependencies
Hello,
please see Openflow Protocol Library (Openflowjava) M3 status below:
Functionality Freeze:
1. Final list of externally consumable APIs defined: Yes
2. Are all your inter-project dependencies
|
By
Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <mirehak@...>
·
#748
·
|
|
Re: [ovsdb-dev] OVSDB scale
+netvirt-dev
Sure, I just created one:
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7591
+netvirt-dev
Sure, I just created one:
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7591
|
By
Sela, Guy <guy.sela@...>
·
#747
·
|
|
Re: [ovsdb-dev] OVSDB scale
Guy,
Could you raise a bug for Netvirt too?
OVSDB patch:https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/50643
Regards,
Vishal.
Guy,
Could you raise a bug for Netvirt too?
OVSDB patch:https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/50643
Regards,
Vishal.
|
By
Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...>
·
#746
·
|
|
Re: [ovsdb-dev] OVSDB scale
I willJ was just waiting for your confirmation.
I willJ was just waiting for your confirmation.
|
By
Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...>
·
#745
·
|
|
Re: [ovsdb-dev] OVSDB scale
Sound good to me Vishal. Anybody planning to push a patch for this ?
--
Thanks
Anil
Sound good to me Vishal. Anybody planning to push a patch for this ?
--
Thanks
Anil
|
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#744
·
|
|
Re: [ovsdb-dev] OVSDB scale
Hi Guy,
Yes, you’re right. I was under wrong impression that inactivity_probe is configured as other_config so will be covered with existing yang. Just confirmed, we *will* need yang changes in
Hi Guy,
Yes, you’re right. I was under wrong impression that inactivity_probe is configured as other_config so will be covered with existing yang. Just confirmed, we *will* need yang changes in
|
By
Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...>
·
#743
·
|
|
Re: [ovsdb-dev] OVSDB scale
I mean the API that OVSDB is exposing to its clients (In this case Netvirt).
It seems to me that OVSDB didn’t model the inactivity_probe in the YANG model itself.
After it will be modeled, OVSDB
I mean the API that OVSDB is exposing to its clients (In this case Netvirt).
It seems to me that OVSDB didn’t model the inactivity_probe in the YANG model itself.
After it will be modeled, OVSDB
|
By
Sela, Guy <guy.sela@...>
·
#742
·
|