Re: [vtn-dev] ODL - Neutron API enhancement to include the southbound driver info
Hideyuki Tai <h-tai@...>
Hi Ed,
Madhu’s proposal focus on the co-existing problem between southbound drivers for Neutron Interface. I explained about this problem in the following mail. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/discuss/2013-November/000910.html To solve this problem, I think Madhu’s proposal is good.
The co-existing problem between Affinity, VTN Manager, and simpleforwarding is a different problem. In the Virtualization Edition, more than one application exist, and they try to control the same network resources simultaneously. Because different applications have different policies on how to control network resources, it’s obvious that flow entries installed by different applications are inconsistent. To solve this problem, we need other solution.
Regards, Hideyuki Tai
From: Ed Warnicke (eaw) [mailto:eaw@...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 11:44 AM To: Tai, Hideyuki Cc: Madhu Venguopal; opendove-dev@...; vtn-dev@...; ovsdb-dev@...; Kyle Mestery (kmestery); <affinity-dev@...>; <discuss@...> Subject: Re: [ovsdb-dev] [vtn-dev] ODL - Neutron API enhancement to include the southbound driver info
So I see the value of this... But what about Affinity?
Ed
|
|