Re: rough agenda for L3 meeting
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Thanks mate! Yes, we do care about the routerID and saw it in the port create message too, so thanks for confirming.
We are leveraging our existing virtual router code from helium with some enhancements, more inline w associating a router with a VRF, but it wouldn't be hard to extend that to multiple routers, but you have to draw a line in the first integration somewhere :)
This is one of those OFP things where we have implemented similar functionality, so when I come up for air I'll publish same and we can compare approaches.
Thank you very much again!
Do you have any indication why we aren't doing the neutron API as a pass through as it was originally described? Ie security group, router CRUD? Ports should have UUID references to their neutron objects and not the objects themselves as described in the API documentation?
On Apr 15, 2015 6:35 AM, "Flavio Fernandes" <ffernand@...> wrote: