This group is locked. No changes can be made to the group while it is locked.
Re: Security Groups implementation
Suryanarayanan, Aswin <aswin.suryanarayanan@...>
Hi Vishal,
Yes we are working on the provider in the net-virt. Neutron part is done , but we have to port it to MD-SAL. Currently we are working with stateless use cases and trying to achieve openstack parity for that. As I understand 0VS 2.4 may support conn-track capabilities, we may have to wait for this to achieve the stateful use cases. Thanks, Aswin ---------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:12:42 +0000 From: Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...> To: "neutron-dev@..." <neutron-dev@...>, "ovsdb-dev@..." <ovsdb-dev@...> Subject: [ovsdb-dev] Security Groups implementation Message-ID: <060FBE8F9E4A26488766FF6E902B43430F6BCD52@...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, I was looking for some information on the SG implementation in ODL. My understanding is that the provider in net-virt is in progress while NeutronNorthbound part of it is complete. Is this correct? I was working with Amir on OVS Firewall during Icehouse/Juno before it got pushed back till conntrack support was available in OVS. My question is about the ODL implementation in-progress now, is it based off conntrack, or does it use one of the earlier approaches [TCP flags or Learn]? I didn't find anything in wiki outlining the design of SG implementation. Could anyone shed any light on these? Regards, Vishal. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/ovsdb-dev/attachments/20150709/f32c1400/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ |
|