z.archive.ovsdb-dev@lists.opendaylight.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

This group is locked. No changes can be made to the group while it is locked.

Messages

Between

and

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] TWS - call for topics

Hi Kieth: Another topic to put on the list is for the user stories that have been started by Red Hat. Dave Neary can help you make contact with the right people for that. Thanks! Phil -- Phil

By Phil Robb · #1755 ·

TWS - call for topics

We are sans agenda for the TWS. There were a lot of interesting topics at the Summit, so I would *think* there’d be a lot of follow on topics. I’ll try and add the relevant –dev lists to my

By alagalah <alagalah@...> · #1754 ·

Migration of OVS ML2 to ODL ML2 for Neutron

Hi, I had conversations last week with a number of you about this topic, and just wanted to strike while the iron was hot to get it on the Be planning cycle (if any work needs doing). When someone

By Dave Neary <dneary@...> · #1753 ·

Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup

Hi Michal, Thanks for the detailed explanation. The ODL_LOCAL_IP helped define interfaces as we needed. Thanks Badri

By Badrinath_Viswanatha@... · #1752 ·

Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup

Hi, The local_ip attribute inside ovs configuration indicate the endpoint of vxlan tunnel on specific node. As you can see here [1] value of this attribute is save inside $ODL_LOCAL_IP which is by

By Michał Skalski <michal@...> · #1751 ·

Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup

Resending Ravi’s mail with watermark removed. Hi Vishal, (Resending the mail by removing “Internal use” tag) We forgot to mention a

By Venkataraghavan Chetput · #1750 ·

Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup

Dell - Internal Use - Confidential Hi Vishal, (Resending the mail by removing “Internal use” tag) We forgot to mention a detail in our

By Ravi Shankar S · #1749 ·

Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup

Dell - Internal Use - Confidential Hi Vishal, We forgot to mention a detail in our multi-node setup i.e., the overlay used is VxLan

By Ravi Shankar S · #1748 ·

Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup

Hi Badri, Try this: `ODL_PROVIDER_MAPPINGS=physnet1:eth1` Regards, Vishal. Sent: 29 July 2015 11:29 To: openstack@...; ovsdb-dev@... Cc:

By Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...> · #1747 ·

DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup

Hi All, We are trying to setup a multi-node devstack setup with opendaylight ML2 plugin. The local.conf, we use with devstack does not have an option to specify the tenant physical

By Badrinath_Viswanatha@... · #1746 ·

No meeting today - 7/28/15

Hi all, no meeting for today with many at the Summit. Thanks, Sam

By Sam Hague · #1745 ·

Re: Jenkins Build failing due to timeout.

It seems to be fixed. The connectivity issue is resolved https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/ovsdb-verify-master/1003/ Thanks Aswin

By Suryanarayanan, Aswin <aswin.suryanarayanan@...> · #1744 ·

Jenkins Build failing due to timeout.

Hi, I see that Jenkins build is failing since git clone times out. Anybody else facing a similar issue? Is there a connectivity issue?

By Suryanarayanan, Aswin <aswin.suryanarayanan@...> · #1743 ·

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?

It will be better if time is friendly for EU and China and India, please forward WebEx link to maillist when it is available.

By Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...> · #1740 ·

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?

Friday Morning would be really greatJ We can definitely join from BLR/India.

By Manohar SL <manohar.sl@...> · #1742 ·

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?

Sounds good - but I have a scheduling request to Phil or whoever arranging the schedule. We have a clustering session continued at 2:15 pm on Thursday. Also Ed is hosting a session solving the same or

By Abhijit Kumbhare · #1739 ·

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?

Hi, Guys I noticed I was drafted as leader for this discussionhttps://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Be_Dev_Forum#OF_Pipeline_Conflict_resolution, but unfortunately I can’t make it because I

By Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...> · #1738 ·

Re: [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?

Brady, for the case we don’t use GBP, we also need to use Openstack, we need to have VNF manager for SF deployment. If we use Openstack Neutron to create subnet and port and VxLAN tunnel, OVSDB

By Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...> · #1737 ·

Re: [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?

Yi, Pity you can't make it. What is very cool is that between just Ed, Tony and I in separate conversations, all of those options, plus a couple more wrinkles on it to support h/w switches, have been

By Keith Burns <alagalah@...> · #1741 ·

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?

Again... I don't believe 'merging' flows with an 'arbiter' is the right solution... these problems are a symptom of choosing the 'arbiter' approach and go away when you make different choices about

By Edward Warnicke <hagbard@...> · #1736 ·

3101 - 3120 of 4855

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms