|
Re: sFlow collector
As far as i know, No, but if somebody want to contribution, i think project should be fine with that.
Anil
--
Thanks
Anil
As far as i know, No, but if somebody want to contribution, i think project should be fine with that.
Anil
--
Thanks
Anil
|
By
Anil Vishnoi
·
#1875
·
|
|
Re: hwvtep high level control flow
Hi Daya/Sam,
I have the few queries on the document.
1. There are 3 ways VXLAN can be established,
i. VXLAN between OVS switches controlled by openstack and ODL.
a.
Hi Daya/Sam,
I have the few queries on the document.
1. There are 3 ways VXLAN can be established,
i. VXLAN between OVS switches controlled by openstack and ODL.
a.
|
By
Ravi Shankar S
·
#1874
·
|
|
sFlow collector
Has any investigation been done to support sFlow collection from OVSDB?
Has any investigation been done to support sFlow collection from OVSDB?
|
By
alagalah <alagalah@...>
·
#1873
·
|
|
splitting out netvirt from ovsdb?
tl;dr
If you want OVSDB netvirt to be a stable feature in Beryllium, it will have to spin out as it's own project (proposed on or before 10/1/2015) and move to mature.
Long version:
Hey guys. I wanted
tl;dr
If you want OVSDB netvirt to be a stable feature in Beryllium, it will have to spin out as it's own project (proposed on or before 10/1/2015) and move to mature.
Long version:
Hey guys. I wanted
|
By
Colin Dixon <colin@...>
·
#1872
·
|
|
hwvtep high level control flow
hi,
here's a first draft of how the control flow to incorporate hwvtep into netvirt.
sam, unfortunately, out of force of habit i started in ppt, and when i copied it to google, it got pasted as a
hi,
here's a first draft of how the control flow to incorporate hwvtep into netvirt.
sam, unfortunately, out of force of habit i started in ppt, and when i copied it to google, it got pasted as a
|
By
daya k
·
#1871
·
|
|
Re: bfd implementation in OVS
thanks ravi and alex! ravi, alex has also confirmed that the pkts are vxlan encapsulated, outer IP would have to be the TEP IP, and inner IP is immaterial since the slow path at the receiver would
thanks ravi and alex! ravi, alex has also confirmed that the pkts are vxlan encapsulated, outer IP would have to be the TEP IP, and inner IP is immaterial since the slow path at the receiver would
|
By
daya k
·
#1869
·
|
|
Re: bfd implementation in OVS
Hi Daya,
BFD operates on top of any data protocol (network layer, link layer, tunnels(vxlan tunnel), etc.) being forwarded between two systems. BFD provides failure detection on
Hi Daya,
BFD operates on top of any data protocol (network layer, link layer, tunnels(vxlan tunnel), etc.) being forwarded between two systems. BFD provides failure detection on
|
By
Ravi Shankar S
·
#1868
·
|
|
Re: Questions about HWVTEP
hi sumit,
you are right about not being able to determine the subnet, so we are stuck with your idea of picking a tunnel, or approach 2 or 3 i mentioned below, or some hybrid.
if the IP is on a
hi sumit,
you are right about not being able to determine the subnet, so we are stuck with your idea of picking a tunnel, or approach 2 or 3 i mentioned below, or some hybrid.
if the IP is on a
|
By
daya k
·
#1867
·
|
|
Re: Questions about HWVTEP
Please see inline below:
--
Sumit Garg
Extreme Networks
sumit@...
+1 (919) 595-4971
From: daya kamath <daya_k@...>
Reply-To: daya kamath <daya_k@...>
Date: Monday, August 24, 2015 at 10:06 AM
To:
Please see inline below:
--
Sumit Garg
Extreme Networks
sumit@...
+1 (919) 595-4971
From: daya kamath <daya_k@...>
Reply-To: daya kamath <daya_k@...>
Date: Monday, August 24, 2015 at 10:06 AM
To:
|
By
Sumit Garg <sumit@...>
·
#1866
·
|
|
Re: [ovs-discuss] bfd implementation in OVS
You need to create a vlxan tunnel between the two host first,
and then enable bfd on the tunnel ports on both end,
yes, bfd pkt will be delivered as single hop,
UDP port,
please check the function
You need to create a vlxan tunnel between the two host first,
and then enable bfd on the tunnel ports on both end,
yes, bfd pkt will be delivered as single hop,
UDP port,
please check the function
|
By
Alex Wang <alexw@...>
·
#1870
·
|
|
Re: Upcoming removal of old OVSDB Jenkins silo
Yes everything is now in releng silo as Flavio pointed out, so it is fine to remove ovsdb silo.
Thanks,
Alexis
Yes everything is now in releng silo as Flavio pointed out, so it is fine to remove ovsdb silo.
Thanks,
Alexis
|
By
Alexis de Talhouet <adetalhouet@...>
·
#1865
·
|
|
Re: Upcoming removal of old OVSDB Jenkins silo
Yeah, we have moved out of the old silo [1] completely. All jobs for ovsdb are jjb based
and use the releng [2] silo now.
— flavio
[1]: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/ovsdb/
[2]:
Yeah, we have moved out of the old silo [1] completely. All jobs for ovsdb are jjb based
and use the releng [2] silo now.
— flavio
[1]: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/ovsdb/
[2]:
|
By
Flavio Fernandes <ffernand@...>
·
#1863
·
|
|
Re: Upcoming removal of old OVSDB Jenkins silo
Just that links in old Gerrits on the OpenStack side of things will
fail. But that's sort of expected with really old submissions anyway.
Even with our system logs don't stick around for more than 40
Just that links in old Gerrits on the OpenStack side of things will
fail. But that's sort of expected with really old submissions anyway.
Even with our system logs don't stick around for more than 40
|
By
Andrew Grimberg <agrimberg@...>
·
#1864
·
|
|
Re: Upcoming removal of old OVSDB Jenkins silo
Andrew,
what does this mean going forward?
Flavio, Alexis, Marcus,
everything has been moved over to jjb right? So we should be OK?
Thanks, Sam
Andrew,
what does this mean going forward?
Flavio, Alexis, Marcus,
everything has been moved over to jjb right? So we should be OK?
Thanks, Sam
|
By
Sam Hague
·
#1862
·
|
|
Upcoming removal of old OVSDB Jenkins silo
Greetings folks,
We have finally surpassed the 6 month log retention window that
OpenStack requires of their 3rd party CI systems. I figured I should
send out to the list that I plan on finally
Greetings folks,
We have finally surpassed the 6 month log retention window that
OpenStack requires of their 3rd party CI systems. I figured I should
send out to the list that I plan on finally
|
By
Andrew Grimberg <agrimberg@...>
·
#1861
·
|
|
bfd implementation in OVS
hi ,
i would like some clarification on the BFD implementation in OVS.
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/016515.html indicates the BFD is not multi-hop but sent through the
hi ,
i would like some clarification on the BFD implementation in OVS.
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/016515.html indicates the BFD is not multi-hop but sent through the
|
By
daya k
·
#1860
·
|
|
OVSDB meetings now at 10:00a PST
Hi all,
we moved the [OVSDB] meetings from 12:00p PST to 10:00a PST. This will start with tomorrow's meeting.
Thanks, Sam
[OVSDB]
Hi all,
we moved the [OVSDB] meetings from 12:00p PST to 10:00a PST. This will start with tomorrow's meeting.
Thanks, Sam
[OVSDB]
|
By
Sam Hague
·
#1859
·
|
|
Re: Questions about HWVTEP
my understanding is partly similar to that of sumit.
creation of the VTEPs themselves is mgmt action, and should be out of scope for this activity.
this value can be published in tunnel_ips field in
my understanding is partly similar to that of sumit.
creation of the VTEPs themselves is mgmt action, and should be out of scope for this activity.
this value can be published in tunnel_ips field in
|
By
daya k
·
#1858
·
|
|
Re: Questions about HWVTEP
Hi Vishal,
For question (1), as SAM mentioned hw-vtep netvirt provider should make sure that a barematel mac (ucast_mac_local) learnt on one device (running hardware_vtep) is added to
Hi Vishal,
For question (1), as SAM mentioned hw-vtep netvirt provider should make sure that a barematel mac (ucast_mac_local) learnt on one device (running hardware_vtep) is added to
|
By
Kenchappa, Ravindra <ravindra.kenchappa@...>
·
#1857
·
|
|
Re: Questions about HWVTEP
Hi,
Added inline comments
Regards,
Ravi
Hi,
Added inline comments
Regards,
Ravi
|
By
Ravi Shankar S
·
#1856
·
|