|
Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] TWS - call for topics
Hi Kieth:
Another topic to put on the list is for the user stories that have been started by Red Hat. Dave Neary can help you make contact with the right people for that.
Thanks!
Phil
--
Phil
Hi Kieth:
Another topic to put on the list is for the user stories that have been started by Red Hat. Dave Neary can help you make contact with the right people for that.
Thanks!
Phil
--
Phil
|
By
Phil Robb
·
#1755
·
|
|
TWS - call for topics
We are sans agenda for the TWS.
There were a lot of interesting topics at the Summit, so I would *think* there’d be a lot of follow on topics. I’ll try and add the relevant –dev lists to my
We are sans agenda for the TWS.
There were a lot of interesting topics at the Summit, so I would *think* there’d be a lot of follow on topics. I’ll try and add the relevant –dev lists to my
|
By
alagalah <alagalah@...>
·
#1754
·
|
|
Migration of OVS ML2 to ODL ML2 for Neutron
Hi,
I had conversations last week with a number of you about this topic, and
just wanted to strike while the iron was hot to get it on the Be
planning cycle (if any work needs doing).
When someone
Hi,
I had conversations last week with a number of you about this topic, and
just wanted to strike while the iron was hot to get it on the Be
planning cycle (if any work needs doing).
When someone
|
By
Dave Neary <dneary@...>
·
#1753
·
|
|
Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup
Hi Michal,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. The ODL_LOCAL_IP helped define interfaces as we needed.
Thanks
Badri
Hi Michal,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. The ODL_LOCAL_IP helped define interfaces as we needed.
Thanks
Badri
|
By
Badrinath_Viswanatha@...
·
#1752
·
|
|
Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup
Hi,
The local_ip attribute inside ovs configuration indicate the endpoint of vxlan tunnel on specific node. As you can see here [1] value of this attribute is save inside $ODL_LOCAL_IP which is by
Hi,
The local_ip attribute inside ovs configuration indicate the endpoint of vxlan tunnel on specific node. As you can see here [1] value of this attribute is save inside $ODL_LOCAL_IP which is by
|
By
Michał Skalski <michal@...>
·
#1751
·
|
|
Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup
Resending Ravi’s mail with watermark removed.
Hi Vishal,
(Resending the mail by removing “Internal use” tag)
We forgot to mention a
Resending Ravi’s mail with watermark removed.
Hi Vishal,
(Resending the mail by removing “Internal use” tag)
We forgot to mention a
|
By
Venkataraghavan Chetput
·
#1750
·
|
|
Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Hi Vishal,
(Resending the mail by removing “Internal use” tag)
We forgot to mention a detail in our
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Hi Vishal,
(Resending the mail by removing “Internal use” tag)
We forgot to mention a detail in our
|
By
Ravi Shankar S
·
#1749
·
|
|
Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Hi Vishal,
We forgot to mention a detail in our multi-node setup i.e., the overlay used is VxLan
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Hi Vishal,
We forgot to mention a detail in our multi-node setup i.e., the overlay used is VxLan
|
By
Ravi Shankar S
·
#1748
·
|
|
Re: DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup
Hi Badri,
Try this: `ODL_PROVIDER_MAPPINGS=physnet1:eth1`
Regards,
Vishal.
Sent: 29 July 2015 11:29
To: openstack@...; ovsdb-dev@...
Cc:
Hi Badri,
Try this: `ODL_PROVIDER_MAPPINGS=physnet1:eth1`
Regards,
Vishal.
Sent: 29 July 2015 11:29
To: openstack@...; ovsdb-dev@...
Cc:
|
By
Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...>
·
#1747
·
|
|
DevStack-opendaylight on a multi-node setup
Hi All,
We are trying to setup a multi-node devstack setup with opendaylight ML2 plugin.
The local.conf, we use with devstack does not have an option to specify the tenant physical
Hi All,
We are trying to setup a multi-node devstack setup with opendaylight ML2 plugin.
The local.conf, we use with devstack does not have an option to specify the tenant physical
|
By
Badrinath_Viswanatha@...
·
#1746
·
|
|
No meeting today - 7/28/15
Hi all,
no meeting for today with many at the Summit.
Thanks, Sam
Hi all,
no meeting for today with many at the Summit.
Thanks, Sam
|
By
Sam Hague
·
#1745
·
|
|
Re: Jenkins Build failing due to timeout.
It seems to be fixed. The connectivity issue is resolved
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/ovsdb-verify-master/1003/
Thanks
Aswin
It seems to be fixed. The connectivity issue is resolved
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/ovsdb-verify-master/1003/
Thanks
Aswin
|
By
Suryanarayanan, Aswin <aswin.suryanarayanan@...>
·
#1744
·
|
|
Jenkins Build failing due to timeout.
Hi, I see that Jenkins build is failing since git clone times out. Anybody else facing a similar issue? Is there a connectivity issue?
Hi, I see that Jenkins build is failing since git clone times out. Anybody else facing a similar issue? Is there a connectivity issue?
|
By
Suryanarayanan, Aswin <aswin.suryanarayanan@...>
·
#1743
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?
It will be better if time is friendly for EU and China and India, please forward WebEx link to maillist when it is available.
It will be better if time is friendly for EU and China and India, please forward WebEx link to maillist when it is available.
|
By
Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>
·
#1740
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?
Friday Morning would be really greatJ
We can definitely join from BLR/India.
Friday Morning would be really greatJ
We can definitely join from BLR/India.
|
By
Manohar SL <manohar.sl@...>
·
#1742
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?
Sounds good - but I have a scheduling request to Phil or whoever arranging the schedule. We have a clustering session continued at 2:15 pm on Thursday. Also Ed is hosting a session solving the same or
Sounds good - but I have a scheduling request to Phil or whoever arranging the schedule. We have a clustering session continued at 2:15 pm on Thursday. Also Ed is hosting a session solving the same or
|
By
Abhijit Kumbhare
·
#1739
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?
Hi, Guys
I noticed I was drafted as leader for this discussionhttps://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Be_Dev_Forum#OF_Pipeline_Conflict_resolution, but unfortunately I can’t make it because I
Hi, Guys
I noticed I was drafted as leader for this discussionhttps://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Be_Dev_Forum#OF_Pipeline_Conflict_resolution, but unfortunately I can’t make it because I
|
By
Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>
·
#1738
·
|
|
Re: [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?
Brady, for the case we don’t use GBP, we also need to use Openstack, we need to have VNF manager for SF deployment. If we use Openstack Neutron to create subnet and port and VxLAN tunnel, OVSDB
Brady, for the case we don’t use GBP, we also need to use Openstack, we need to have VNF manager for SF deployment. If we use Openstack Neutron to create subnet and port and VxLAN tunnel, OVSDB
|
By
Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.yang@...>
·
#1737
·
|
|
Re: [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?
Yi,
Pity you can't make it. What is very cool is that between just Ed, Tony and I in separate conversations, all of those options, plus a couple more wrinkles on it to support h/w switches, have been
Yi,
Pity you can't make it. What is very cool is that between just Ed, Tony and I in separate conversations, all of those options, plus a couple more wrinkles on it to support h/w switches, have been
|
By
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
·
#1741
·
|
|
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] How can we fix multiple masters issue better for openflowplugin?
Again... I don't believe 'merging' flows with an 'arbiter' is the right solution... these problems are a symptom of choosing the 'arbiter' approach and go away when you make different choices
about
Again... I don't believe 'merging' flows with an 'arbiter' is the right solution... these problems are a symptom of choosing the 'arbiter' approach and go away when you make different choices
about
|
By
Edward Warnicke <hagbard@...>
·
#1736
·
|