Hello all, As promised (on the weekly meeting a while ago and in an email yesterday): Since many have / are struggling with setting up the environment for ODL -- DevStack testing / development I have

FYI, for those like me who were wondering why QoS is part of root set. Implementation decision for usability. Begin forwarded message:

Sorry, we had the hangout today. And we could not record because it was not a Hangout On Air (stupid Google and their awful, awful UI interfaces). The end result was we're focusing on the final pieces

Hi Kyle, Is it schedule on Friday 10am PST? Thank You, Punal Patel

Hi folks Thanks for your reply. Good to know that you guys don't have that issue, and i also check ovsdb jenkins build job, it is successful too. So i am wondering those issues may cause by my

Sorry for chiming in late. I'd love to join, but I can only stay until 10am PST (because I'd like to listen in on the ODP TSC meeting). thanks, Pino Pino de Candia, Midokura.com (+34) 633 387 885

Hi Kyle, thanks for organizing this. It works for me! Rossella

Kyle- As of right now, I'm not going to be able to make it until 10am PST Thursday, but I can make 9 am PST on Friday... Ryan "Kyle Mestery (kmestery)" ---12/04/2013 03:01:36 PM---Folks: I want to

Kyle, Works for me. -Madhu

Count me in ! Looking fwd to it already.

Folks: I want to setup a Google Hangout to go over the following agenda in detail: 1. Bring new folks up to speed on the Neutron work happening. 2. Begin talking about how we do L3 in ODL for

Hi Huang, Can you please share with us the error that you during building the project ? Our local builds and Jenkins, etc are not complaining and am wondering why you should see

Hey Denghui, Thanks for the patch, can you push it to gerrit? I would be interested to know which error you are seeing that requires these additional dependencies. I’ve tried several compiles with

Hi Madhu Last few days, i follow very closely to ovsdb maven related work, i saw Hugo had two commits related this area, Introduce a root pom in the top of the project. Fixup the pom files to

Just a final note, if the intention for next release is to have a better harmonization among virtualization apps, I think option 1) goes more on the right direction.

Hi Suchi, Its my fault that I had not participated in the previous discussions on Affinity + VTN in the virtualization edition & would like to understand it better. It would

Anil, Seems like we are converging on keeping this a ODL side configuration & am perfectly fine with that. I kind of sensed this from Kyle on the IRC as well (though he hasnt

Anees, Lori, Yes. I had the same conflicting thought within me when I proposed this & hence kept both the options open. We can infact keep this an ODL specific configuration if it is understood that

IMHO VTN,Dove,Affinity are the virtualization solution on top of ODL platform and openstack should be agnostic of these virtualization solution. ODL should be a southbound for openstack rather then

On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Hideyuki Tai <h-tai@...> wrote: Agreed… I was just calling attention to the fact that while I think Madhu has made an elegant proposal for the Neutron side of this