Multiple tunnel_ips
Santosh
Hi All, I believe if hardware vtep publishes multiple tunnel ip , odl is assume to pick the first ip which would be used as ip address in the vxlan tunnel creation. Is this something which could configured ? Is this understanding holds true for boron or I am missing something here. Do let me know. Thanks Santosh |
|
Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...>
Hi Santosh,
Could you clarify the question? When you say vxlan tunnel creation, you mean from OVS/Compute to VTEP or VTEP to VTEP?
Regards, Vishal.
From: ovsdb-dev-bounces@... [mailto:ovsdb-dev-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Santosh Singh
Sent: 22 March 2017 11:33 To: ovsdb-dev@... Subject: [ovsdb-dev] Multiple tunnel_ips
Hi All, I believe if hardware vtep publishes multiple tunnel ip , odl is assume to pick the first ip which would be used as ip address in the vxlan tunnel creation.
Is this something which could configured ?
Is this understanding holds true for boron or I am missing something here.
Do let me know.
Thanks Santosh |
|
Santosh
Hi vishal, I am referring to both scenario. I.e. ovs/ compute to vtep and vtep to vtep. basically how tunnel endpoint ip would be selected in case of multiple tunnel ips is published to odl from vtep . Thanks Santosh. On 23-Mar-2017 8:52 am, "Vishal Thapar" <vishal.thapar@...> wrote:
|
|
Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...>
Adding netvit-dev as this is more of a netvirt question, plugin has nothing to do with how we setup tunnels.
Added Suneelu for inputs. I think when we get a Physical_Switch with multiple tunnel_ips we do setup multiple tunnels in ITM for it and not just the first one. Actual tunnel used depends on physical locator used when configuring a remote mac entry. I’ll have to look at code but Suneelu might be able to answer off top of his head.
Regards, Vishal.
From: Santosh Singh [mailto:santosh.chandan@...]
Sent: 23 March 2017 09:16 To: Vishal Thapar <vishal.thapar@...> Cc: ovsdb-dev@... Subject: RE: [ovsdb-dev] Multiple tunnel_ips
Hi vishal,
I am referring to both scenario. I.e. ovs/ compute to vtep and vtep to vtep.
basically how tunnel endpoint ip would be selected in case of multiple tunnel ips is published to odl from vtep .
Thanks Santosh.
On 23-Mar-2017 8:52 am, "Vishal Thapar" <vishal.thapar@...> wrote:
|
|
suneelu
Hi Santosh, If multiple tunnel ips are configured , which one to pick and use is undefined. Currently we are choosing the first tunnel ip from the mdsal tree and ignoring the second tunnel ip. Thanks, Suneelu
From: Vishal Thapar
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 9:56 AM To: Santosh Singh; K.V Suneelu Verma Cc: ovsdb-dev@...; odl netvirt dev Subject: RE: [ovsdb-dev] Multiple tunnel_ips
Adding netvit-dev as this is more of a netvirt question, plugin has nothing to do with how we setup tunnels.
Added Suneelu for inputs. I think when we get a Physical_Switch with multiple tunnel_ips we do setup multiple tunnels in ITM for it and not just the first one. Actual tunnel used depends on physical locator used when configuring a remote mac entry. I’ll have to look at code but Suneelu might be able to answer off top of his head.
Regards, Vishal.
From: Santosh Singh [mailto:santosh.chandan@...]
Hi vishal,
I am referring to both scenario. I.e. ovs/ compute to vtep and vtep to vtep.
basically how tunnel endpoint ip would be selected in case of multiple tunnel ips is published to odl from vtep .
Thanks Santosh.
On 23-Mar-2017 8:52 am, "Vishal Thapar" <vishal.thapar@...> wrote:
|
|
Santosh
Thanks suneelu and vishal for confirming. On 23-Mar-2017 3:01 pm, "K.V Suneelu Verma" <k.v.suneelu.verma@...> wrote:
|
|