|
Re: [release] Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc
Hello Jaime,
yes, they will, but that will happen post-oxygen release, once
yangtools-2.0.2 comes down the pipeline.
Regards,
Robert
|
Hello Jaime,
yes, they will, but that will happen post-oxygen release, once
yangtools-2.0.2 comes down the pipeline.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga <nite@...>
·
#4387
·
|
|
Re: [release] Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc
Robert, this will also affect oxygen/fluorine right?
Fix in
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/68818/
BR
Jaime.
|
Robert, this will also affect oxygen/fluorine right?
Fix in
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/68818/
BR
Jaime.
|
By
Jaime CaamaƱo Ruiz
·
#4386
·
|
|
[release] Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc
Attention sfc-devs,
Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc in build
411. Attached is a snippet of the error message related to the
failure that we were able to automatically
|
Attention sfc-devs,
Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc in build
411. Attached is a snippet of the error message related to the
failure that we were able to automatically
|
By
Jenkins <jenkins-dontreply@...>
·
#4385
·
|
|
Re: netconf-testtool-0.3.0-20150320.211342-654-executable.jar
Michael,
Thanks for the heads-up. Phil told me about that a while ago. I'll do that tomorrow.
Regards,
Brady
|
Michael,
Thanks for the heads-up. Phil told me about that a while ago. I'll do that tomorrow.
Regards,
Brady
|
By
Brady Allen Johnson
·
#4384
·
|
|
Re: [release] Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/MDSAL-313 tracks this effort.
Regards,
Robert
|
https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/MDSAL-313 tracks this effort.
Regards,
Robert
|
By
Robert Varga <nite@...>
·
#4383
·
|
|
Re: [release] Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc
Hello Brady,
It is not, you are asserting exception on failure message strings. These
have changed to fix YANGTOOLS-798
(https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/68461/), I expect the same
thing will
|
Hello Brady,
It is not, you are asserting exception on failure message strings. These
have changed to fix YANGTOOLS-798
(https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/68461/), I expect the same
thing will
|
By
Robert Varga <nite@...>
·
#4382
·
|
|
Re: [release] Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc
I cant reproduce this locally with the latest Nitrogen artifacts today. I'd like to wait until tonight's build to see if this is a transient failure.
Regards,
Brady Johnson
bjohnson@...
|
I cant reproduce this locally with the latest Nitrogen artifacts today. I'd like to wait until tonight's build to see if this is a transient failure.
Regards,
Brady Johnson
bjohnson@...
|
By
Brady Johnson <bjohnson@...>
·
#4381
·
|
|
netconf-testtool-0.3.0-20150320.211342-654-executable.jar
Hello SFCians,
An OpenDaylight codebase license scan by LF Steve in Cc chokes (hard) on that netconf-testtool-0.3.0-20150320.211342-654-executable.jar you have in sfc/sfc-test (see e.g.
|
Hello SFCians,
An OpenDaylight codebase license scan by LF Steve in Cc chokes (hard) on that netconf-testtool-0.3.0-20150320.211342-654-executable.jar you have in sfc/sfc-test (see e.g.
|
By
Michael Vorburger <vorburger@...>
·
#4380
·
|
|
[release] Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc
Attention sfc-devs,
Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc in build
410. Attached is a snippet of the error message related to the
failure that we were able to automatically
|
Attention sfc-devs,
Autorelease nitrogen failed to build sfc-openflow-utils from sfc in build
410. Attached is a snippet of the error message related to the
failure that we were able to automatically
|
By
Jenkins <jenkins-dontreply@...>
·
#4379
·
|
|
Re: sfc csit failures in carbon sr3
same thing is needed for nitrogen sr2 as well.
|
same thing is needed for nitrogen sr2 as well.
|
By
Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...>
·
#4378
·
|
|
sfc csit failures in carbon sr3
SFC,
we still need someone to validate your CSIT failures for the carbon sr3
candidate are not a regression from sr2.
JamO
|
SFC,
we still need someone to validate your CSIT failures for the carbon sr3
candidate are not a regression from sr2.
JamO
|
By
Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@...>
·
#4377
·
|
|
SFC code frozen for Oxygen release
Hello,
The SFC code is now frozen for the Oxygen release. Refer to the M4 milestone report [0] for details.
That means from now on, the only changes allowed will be for BUG (JIRA) fixes. If you need
|
Hello,
The SFC code is now frozen for the Oxygen release. Refer to the M4 milestone report [0] for details.
That means from now on, the only changes allowed will be for BUG (JIRA) fixes. If you need
|
By
Brady Allen Johnson
·
#4376
·
|
|
Re: ODL sfc demo setup with Openstack-Neutron and Tacker
Hi,
Another person asked me yesterday too and the Pike option worked for him and I also tried yesterday and it worked, besides it is working in CI. That's why I suspect the problem is on your side and
|
Hi,
Another person asked me yesterday too and the Pike option worked for him and I also tried yesterday and it worked, besides it is working in CI. That's why I suspect the problem is on your side and
|
By
Manuel Buil
·
#4375
·
|
|
Re: ODL sfc demo setup with Openstack-Neutron and Tacker
Hi Manuel,
I have tried with Openstack Pike Release, Here also i am facing similar issue in the ansible task : [ansible-hardening : Add or remove packages based on STIG requirements]
This task is
|
Hi Manuel,
I have tried with Openstack Pike Release, Here also i am facing similar issue in the ansible task : [ansible-hardening : Add or remove packages based on STIG requirements]
This task is
|
By
Phaneendra Manda <mphaneendra@...>
·
#4374
·
|
|
Re: ODL sfc demo setup with Openstack-Neutron and Tacker
Hi,
Could you try the: #### OpeStack Pike release #### --> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/sfc/Deploy+OPNFV+SFC+scenarios?
I deployed Pike this morning successfully following those instructions.
|
Hi,
Could you try the: #### OpeStack Pike release #### --> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/sfc/Deploy+OPNFV+SFC+scenarios?
I deployed Pike this morning successfully following those instructions.
|
By
Manuel Buil
·
#4373
·
|
|
Re: ODL sfc demo setup with Openstack-Neutron and Tacker
Hi Manuel,
I have got higher capacity hardware and installing the mini flavor. I have run the installation script multiple times, but the setup always fails at the below task.
Please help to solve
|
Hi Manuel,
I have got higher capacity hardware and installing the mini flavor. I have run the installation script multiple times, but the setup always fails at the below task.
Please help to solve
|
By
Phaneendra Manda <mphaneendra@...>
·
#4372
·
|
|
Meeting Minutes for weekly ODL SFC meeting
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-sfc/2018/january_31__2018/opendaylight-sfc-january_31__2018.2018-01-31-17.07.html
Regards,
Brady
|
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-sfc/2018/january_31__2018/opendaylight-sfc-january_31__2018.2018-01-31-17.07.html
Regards,
Brady
|
By
Brady Allen Johnson
·
#4371
·
|
|
Re: Need Help in setting up ODL-SFC
Hello Tim,
I still have no experience with Apex, so I cannot help Harsh. Maybe you know what is going on?
Regards,
Manuel
|
Hello Tim,
I still have no experience with Apex, so I cannot help Harsh. Maybe you know what is going on?
Regards,
Manuel
|
By
Manuel Buil
·
#4370
·
|
|
Need Help in setting up ODL-SFC
Hi,
Using http://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-euphrates/submodules/apex/docs/release/installation/index.html#apex-installation I was successful in installing an Apex installation of OpenStack (Ocata
|
Hi,
Using http://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-euphrates/submodules/apex/docs/release/installation/index.html#apex-installation I was successful in installing an Apex installation of OpenStack (Ocata
|
By
HARSH AGARWAL <cs15btech11019@...>
·
#4369
·
|
|
Re: [integration-dev] sfc csit failure
Awesome, that's great to hear!
Cheers,
Thanh
|
Awesome, that's great to hear!
Cheers,
Thanh
|
By
Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@...>
·
#4368
·
|