This group is locked. No changes can be made to the group while it is locked.
Date
1 - 2 of 2
[integration-dev] SFC job failures
Abhijit Kumbhare
OK - I am mistaken as I thought SFC had not added their release plan for Sodium. But it appears they have: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-210. They state for the release plan: No new features are planned to be added in Sodium but SFC plans to be part of the release. So they are not out. But adding SFC & Jaime - in case their plans have changed. If not they likely need to fix the issues that Jaya brought up. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:30 PM Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote:
|
|
Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
Hello
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It looks that the opnfv.org server is cutting the download of the test image [1]. Can we store that image somewhere closer to opendaylight.org? As for Jaya, the download works for me so openfv.org must be throttling opendaylight.org in some way. Otherwise, the last succesful run of that job was #260 on 31st of July, and it seemed to start failing for a different reason. So we will probably need to look further after that. BR Jaime. [1] https://artifacts.opnfv.org/sfc/images/sfc_nsh_fraser.qcow2 -----Original Message-----
From: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> To: Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...>, SFC <sfc-dev@...> , Jaime Caamano <JCaamano@...> Cc: Jaya Priyadarshini <jaya.priyadarshini@...>, integration- dev@... <integration-dev@...>, netvirt-dev@... <netvirt-dev@...> Subject: Re: [integration-dev] SFC job failures Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:20:03 -0700 OK - I am mistaken as I thought SFC had not added their release plan for Sodium. But it appears they have: https://jira.opendaylight.org/bro wse/TSC-210. They state for the release plan: No new features are planned to be added in Sodium but SFC plans to be part of the release. So they are not out. But adding SFC & Jaime - in case their plans have changed. If not they likely need to fix the issues that Jaya brought up. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:30 PM Luis Gomez <ecelgp@...> wrote: Is this true? if so we have to remove SFC depency in netvirt + remove |
|