Dear Kudo-san, I agree with your proposal. Best regards, -- Kouji Tanaka <k-tanaka@...>

Dear all, I agree to this idea. Best regards, Taiki Kondo (2013/06/25 10:32), m-kudo@... wrote:

+1 for adding Sarath san. T.Yamabe (2013/06/25 10:32), m-kudo@... wrote:

Kudo-san, <m-kudo@...> wrote: I agree to your proposal. Regards, -- Shigeru Yasuda

Dear All I agree to add him, too. Best Regards, T.Kawagishi

Dear all, I agree with it. m-kudo@... wrote:

Dear Committers, I would like to call for a vote of the approval of Mr. Sarath as a committer. He is very knowledgable about VTN because has been participating in the VTN development. As you recall,

Ed, One clarification. As VTN is an application and has some dependency on the base controller, we think VTN should be Offset 1. How do we coordinate these Offsets ? Thanks, Su-Hun Yun | Senior

:) Ed wrote:

Ed san, Sure, I just added 'OpenDaylight Virtual Tenant Network (VTN)' into the 'Participating Projects'. Best regards, -- M. Kudo

Kudo-san, Today is the M0 of the Simultaneous Release, the official opening of the release. You have been clear in your intent for VTN to join the Simultaneous Release, something I'm quite excited

Hi, Thank you for reading the documents! Yes, your understanding is quite right. VTN is a solution which isolate physical network to many virtual tenant network. You can create interfaces (virtual

I am a new to vtn, i already read NEC_VTN_Demo_0606.pdf and NEC_VTN_Implementation_0606.pdf. I have a feeling, VTN is a solution which isolate physical network to many virtual tenant networks,

Ed san, As I promised, I am sending a tentative release plan of the VTN project. We are willing to discuss the collaboration with the Dove project. Depending on the progress of the discussion, the