[sfc-dev] [OpenDaylight Discuss] [lispflowmapping-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] App Coexistence / Multi Writer - CALL REQUEST Thu 9/3 7 AM PDT

Sam Hague shague at redhat.com
Mon Aug 31 14:02:49 UTC 2015


Count me in also.

Thanks ,Sam

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Andre Fredette <afredette at redhat.com>
wrote:

> I'm interested, and the time slot works for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Andre
>
>
> On 8/28/15 6:54 PM, Elzur, Uri wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> This subject of multi projects configuring the vSwitch is of extreme
> importance to the ODL community I believe. We’d like to rekindle this
> discussion and present few ideas of requirements for project coexistence
> and debate potential ways to address that
>
>
>
> Would like to suggest this time slot as it seems like a group of us have
> used it in the past few weeks.
>
>
>
> Pls reply if interested
>
>
>
> Thx
>
>
>
> Uri (“Oo-Ree”)
>
> C: 949-378-7568
>
>
>
> *From:* discuss-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org [
> mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org
> <discuss-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org>] *On Behalf Of *Edward Warnicke
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2015 8:04 AM
> *To:* Andre Fredette
> *Cc:* sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org;
> GroupBasedPolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org;
> lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org; discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [sfc-dev] [lispflowmapping-dev]
> [groupbasedpolicy-dev] Honeycomb, App Coexistence, Overlay Layer... do we
> need meetings/calls
>
>
>
> Not yet... I am trying to get a starter together for folks to play with :)
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Andre Fredette <afredette at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> Has a meeting been scheduled?
>
> Thanks
> Andre
>
>
>
> On 8/13/15 2:49 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
>
> I would prefer any day other than Thursday but I will adjust to the
> majority.
>
>
>
> BR/Luis
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare < <abhijitkoss at gmail.com>
> abhijitkoss at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> No from my side. Please pick a different slot :)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Edward Warnicke < <hagbard at gmail.com>
> hagbard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There was a desire discussed for a followup meeting next week... would the
> same time (Thu 7am PST) work for folks?
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Edward Warnicke < <hagbard at gmail.com>
> hagbard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The meeting recording link is here (many thanks to Phil Robb for getting
> it for us):
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fmeetings.webex.com%2Fcollabs%2Furl%2F4bVackqEv6dcSN6W6iqfxKjMlH1s9Qvsx-bDWO5KVJe00000&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFpnY86OplNtoXMnoNbe8LZ4gdjFw>
> https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/url/4bVackqEv6dcSN6W6iqfxKjMlH1s9Qvsx-bDWO5KVJe00000
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:04 AM, George Zhao < <George.Y.Zhao at huawei.com>
> George.Y.Zhao at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> The meeting has been recorded.
>
>
>
> *From:* <discuss-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org>
> discuss-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> <discuss-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org>
> discuss-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2015 7:42 AM
> *To:* Keith Burns
> *Cc:* <discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>discuss at lists.opendaylight.org;
> <sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org;
> <GroupBasedPolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> GroupBasedPolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org;
> <lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org; Prem sankar G
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [lispflowmapping-dev] [sfc-dev]
> [groupbasedpolicy-dev] Honeycomb, App Coexistence, Overlay Layer... do we
> need meetings/calls
>
>
>
> Same here - as I had mentioned earlier I also have a conflict. Would like
> to check out the recording later.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Keith Burns < <alagalah at gmail.com>
> alagalah at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I won't be able to do it either. Opnfv mtgs.
>
> On Aug 12, 2015 11:49 PM, "Luis Gomez" < <ecelgp at gmail.com>
> ecelgp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I got last mininute overlapping stuff :(
>
>
>
> Would it be possible to record this call and share the link after?
>
>
>
> Thanks/Luis
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 10, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Edward Warnicke < <hagbard at gmail.com>
> hagbard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> The meeting for 7am on Thursday is set, you should be able to follow this
> link to it:
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/calendar/render#eventpage_6%7Ceid-b3VnYW1kZXU4bmhndmVuNHVoNWE1cG9pYzAgaDc5aGltYm9rcThhYXVyOWxlZDhvYzc5MGdAZw-1-0>
> https://www.google.com/calendar/render#eventpage_6%7Ceid-b3VnYW1kZXU4bmhndmVuNHVoNWE1cG9pYzAgaDc5aGltYm9rcThhYXVyOWxlZDhvYzc5MGdAZw-1-0
> -
>
>
>
> But just in case, here is the webex info:
>
>
>
> When it's time, start the meeting from here:
>
>
> <https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/meetings/join?uuid=MDHJCXR45WFFOUDWYX9FPOR0VK-9VIB>
> https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/meetings/join?uuid=MDHJCXR45WFFOUDWYX9FPOR0VK-9VIB
>
>
>
>
>
> Agenda
>
> This meeting does not have an agenda.
>
>
>
> Access Information
>
> Where: WebEx Online
>
> Meeting number: 198 700 967
>
> Meeting password: This meeting does not require a password.
>
> Host key: 262524 (Use this key in the meeting if you have made someone
> else the host and then want to reclaim the host role.)
>
>
>
> Audio Connection
>
> 1-855-244-8681 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada)
>
> 1-650-479-3207 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)
>
> Access code: 198 700 967
>
>
>
> Need more numbers or information?
>
> Check out toll-free calling restrictions:
>
> <https://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf>
> https://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Anil Vishnoi < <vishnoianil at gmail.com>
> vishnoianil at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ed,
>
>
>
> Please include me as well.  Thursday works better for me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Anil
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Florin Coras -X (fcoras - AAP3 INC at
> Cisco) < <fcoras at cisco.com>fcoras at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> +1 on Thursday
>
>
>
> Florin
>
>
>
> *From: *< <lispflowmapping-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org>
> lispflowmapping-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org> on behalf of "Vina
> Ermagan (vermagan)"
> *Date: *Friday, August 7, 2015 at 9:03 PM
> *To: *Edward Warnicke, Prem sankar G
> *Cc: *" <discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>discuss at lists.opendaylight.org", "
> <sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org", "
> <groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org", "
> <lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [lispflowmapping-dev] [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev]
> Honeycomb, App Coexistence, Overlay Layer... do we need meetings/calls
>
>
>
> +1 on Thursday
>
>
>
> Vina
>
>
>
> *From: *Edward Warnicke < <hagbard at gmail.com>hagbard at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, August 7, 2015 10:00 AM
> *To: *Prem sankar G < <prem.sankar.g at ericsson.com>
> prem.sankar.g at ericsson.com>
> *Cc: *" <discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>discuss at lists.opendaylight.org" <
> <discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>, "
> <sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org" <
> <sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>, "
> <groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org" <
> <groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>, "
> <lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org" <
> <lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [sfc-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] Honeycomb, App
> Coexistence, Overlay Layer... do we need meetings/calls
>
>
>
> How would folks feel about 7am PST Tue or Thursday of next week for a
> kickoff?
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prem sankar G <
> <prem.sankar.g at ericsson.com>prem.sankar.g at ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Ed,
>
> +1 and would be interested to participate in all of these topics.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Prem
>
>
>
> *From:* <groupbasedpolicy-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org>
> <groupbasedpolicy-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org>
> groupbasedpolicy-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> <groupbasedpolicy-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org>
> groupbasedpolicy-dev-bounces at lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward
> Warnicke
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2015 4:15 PM
> *To:* <discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>discuss at lists.opendaylight.org;
> <lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> lispflowmapping-dev at lists.opendaylight.org;
> <groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>
> groupbasedpolicy-dev at lists.opendaylight.org;
> <sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org>sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org
> *Subject:* [groupbasedpolicy-dev] Honeycomb, App Coexistence, Overlay
> Layer... do we need meetings/calls
>
>
>
> At the ODL Design Summit, we had a series of discussions around:
>
>
>
> - App Coexistence via layered/stacked pipelines
>
> - Growing a proper overlay topology layer that could meet the needs of
> various other layers (Policy, SFC, etc)
>
> - Honeycomb - building a distributed ODL agent out of ODL parts that could
> run on the local server
>
>
>
> I've had several folks reach out to me unicast wanting to get involved in
> one or more of these,
>
> and so I was curious if there was any interest or appetite for some kind
> of a regular meeting/call/IRC meeting about them so we can coordinate
> together.
>
>
>
> One of the interesting parts about all three of these is that they are
> less 'A new project with a new repo' and more 'Initiatives for projects to
> cross collaborate in interesting ways'.  There's work to be done, but its
> often cross project work.
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> <Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks
>
> Anil
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> <Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> <Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> <Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> <Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org>Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> sfc-dev mailing list
>
> sfc-dev at lists.opendaylight.org
>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/sfc-dev/attachments/20150831/1053fd6d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the sfc-dev mailing list